Re: [PATCH] sound: max98090: Remove executable bit

[Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>]

On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 17:36 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:22:16AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 10:57 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > I've applied this but I'm fed up to the back teeth of having to hand
> > > edit trivial patches from you because you ignore the subject line styles
> > > of subsystems and make up your own.
> 
> > Your style rules just don't matter to me and
> > you can ignore the patches and fix it yourself.
> 
> > Or better, create a tool for others to use that
> > follow your silly style rules.
> 
> This is just like any other coding style thing - you should be creating
> patches that look like other patches for the affected, if there's things
> like obvious visual differences in what you're doing you're doing it
> wrong.

We've had this conversation before and I proposed
to you a simple solution.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/16/245
and I still more or less agree with Florian
https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/16/314

I'm not doing it wrong.  You have another demand
others don't.  I simply don't find it necessary to
cater to you.

If you want it to be agreed that there is a specific
form for subject headers that varies by maintainer tree,
change SubmittingPatches Paragraph 11.

> Automation doesn't work for things like this, there's a good solid
> reason why there's generally a human involved in patch; the other people
> who submit lots of cleanups generally manage to figure this out
> usefully, you might want to discuss techniques with them.

I suggest you use a git pre-commit hook to your
tree and use sed/perl to add a specific prefix
if it doesn't exist.
http://codeinthehole.com/writing/tips-for-using-a-git-pre-commit-hook/