From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, arjan@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de,
pjt@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alex.shi@intel.com
Subject: [patch v6 12/21] sched: add power aware scheduling in fork/exec/wake
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:34:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364654108-16307-13-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364654108-16307-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>
This patch add power aware scheduling in fork/exec/wake. It try to
select cpu from the busiest while still has utilization group. That's
will save power since it leaves more groups idle in system.
The trade off is adding a power aware statistics collection in group
seeking. But since the collection just happened in power scheduling
eligible condition, the worst case of hackbench testing just drops
about 2% with powersaving policy. No clear change for performance
policy.
The main function in this patch is get_cpu_for_power_policy(), that
will try to get a idlest cpu from the busiest while still has
utilization group, if the system is using power aware policy and
has such group.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 8ac021f..83b2c39 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3368,25 +3368,113 @@ static unsigned int max_rq_util(int cpu)
}
/*
- * sched_balance_self: balance the current task (running on cpu) in domains
+ * Try to collect the task running number and capacity of the group.
+ */
+static void get_sg_power_stats(struct sched_group *group,
+ struct sched_domain *sd, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_cpus(group))
+ sgs->group_util += max_rq_util(i);
+
+ sgs->group_weight = group->group_weight;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Is this domain full of utilization with the task?
+ */
+static int is_sd_full(struct sched_domain *sd,
+ struct task_struct *p, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
+{
+ struct sched_group *group;
+ struct sg_lb_stats sgs;
+ long sd_min_delta = LONG_MAX;
+ unsigned int putil;
+
+ if (p->se.load.weight == p->se.avg.load_avg_contrib)
+ /* p maybe a new forked task */
+ putil = FULL_UTIL;
+ else
+ putil = (u64)(p->se.avg.runnable_avg_sum << SCHED_POWER_SHIFT)
+ / (p->se.avg.runnable_avg_period + 1);
+
+ /* Try to collect the domain's utilization */
+ group = sd->groups;
+ do {
+ long g_delta;
+
+ memset(&sgs, 0, sizeof(sgs));
+ get_sg_power_stats(group, sd, &sgs);
+
+ g_delta = sgs.group_weight * FULL_UTIL - sgs.group_util;
+
+ if (g_delta > 0 && g_delta < sd_min_delta) {
+ sd_min_delta = g_delta;
+ sds->group_leader = group;
+ }
+
+ sds->sd_util += sgs.group_util;
+ } while (group = group->next, group != sd->groups);
+
+ if (sds->sd_util + putil < sd->span_weight * FULL_UTIL)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* can not hold one more task in this domain */
+ return 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Execute power policy if this domain is not full.
+ */
+static inline int get_sd_sched_balance_policy(struct sched_domain *sd,
+ int cpu, struct task_struct *p, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
+{
+ if (sched_balance_policy == SCHED_POLICY_PERFORMANCE)
+ return SCHED_POLICY_PERFORMANCE;
+
+ memset(sds, 0, sizeof(*sds));
+ if (is_sd_full(sd, p, sds))
+ return SCHED_POLICY_PERFORMANCE;
+ return sched_balance_policy;
+}
+
+/*
+ * If power policy is eligible for this domain, and it has task allowed cpu.
+ * we will select CPU from this domain.
+ */
+static int get_cpu_for_power_policy(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu,
+ struct task_struct *p, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
+{
+ int policy;
+ int new_cpu = -1;
+
+ policy = get_sd_sched_balance_policy(sd, cpu, p, sds);
+ if (policy != SCHED_POLICY_PERFORMANCE && sds->group_leader)
+ new_cpu = find_idlest_cpu(sds->group_leader, p, cpu);
+
+ return new_cpu;
+}
+
+/*
+ * select_task_rq_fair: balance the current task (running on cpu) in domains
* that have the 'flag' flag set. In practice, this is SD_BALANCE_FORK and
* SD_BALANCE_EXEC.
*
- * Balance, ie. select the least loaded group.
- *
* Returns the target CPU number, or the same CPU if no balancing is needed.
*
* preempt must be disabled.
*/
static int
-select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
+select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
{
struct sched_domain *tmp, *affine_sd = NULL, *sd = NULL;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
int prev_cpu = task_cpu(p);
int new_cpu = cpu;
int want_affine = 0;
- int sync = wake_flags & WF_SYNC;
+ int sync = flags & WF_SYNC;
+ struct sd_lb_stats sds;
if (p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
return prev_cpu;
@@ -3412,11 +3500,20 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
break;
}
- if (tmp->flags & sd_flag)
+ if (tmp->flags & sd_flag) {
sd = tmp;
+
+ new_cpu = get_cpu_for_power_policy(sd, cpu, p, &sds);
+ if (new_cpu != -1)
+ goto unlock;
+ }
}
if (affine_sd) {
+ new_cpu = get_cpu_for_power_policy(affine_sd, cpu, p, &sds);
+ if (new_cpu != -1)
+ goto unlock;
+
if (cpu != prev_cpu && wake_affine(affine_sd, p, sync))
prev_cpu = cpu;
--
1.7.12
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-30 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-30 14:34 [patch v6 0/21] sched: power aware scheduling Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:34 ` [patch v6 01/21] Revert "sched: Introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED dependency for load-tracking" Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:34 ` [patch v6 02/21] sched: set initial value of runnable avg for new forked task Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:34 ` [patch v6 03/21] sched: only count runnable avg on cfs_rq's nr_running Alex Shi
2013-04-02 14:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-03 1:02 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03 1:23 ` Paul Turner
2013-04-03 2:12 ` Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:34 ` [patch v6 04/21] sched: add sched balance policies in kernel Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:34 ` [patch v6 05/21] sched: add sysfs interface for sched_balance_policy selection Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:34 ` [patch v6 06/21] sched: log the cpu utilization at rq Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:34 ` [patch v6 07/21] sched: add new sg/sd_lb_stats fields for incoming fork/exec/wake balancing Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:34 ` [patch v6 08/21] sched: move sg/sd_lb_stats struct ahead Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:34 ` [patch v6 09/21] sched: scale_rt_power rename and meaning change Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:34 ` [patch v6 10/21] sched: get rq potential maximum utilization Alex Shi
2013-04-02 9:02 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-04-02 13:38 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03 2:15 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03 2:22 ` Paul Turner
2013-04-03 2:35 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03 8:07 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-02 14:38 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-03 1:11 ` Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:34 ` [patch v6 11/21] sched: detect wakeup burst with rq->avg_idle Alex Shi
2013-04-03 8:12 ` Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:34 ` Alex Shi [this message]
2013-04-01 9:50 ` [patch v6 12/21] sched: add power aware scheduling in fork/exec/wake Preeti U Murthy
2013-04-01 13:43 ` Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:35 ` [patch v6 13/21] sched: using avg_idle to detect bursty wakeup Alex Shi
2013-04-03 5:08 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-04-03 5:41 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03 8:10 ` Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:35 ` [patch v6 14/21] sched: packing transitory tasks in wakeup power balancing Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:35 ` [patch v6 15/21] sched: add power/performance balance allow flag Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:35 ` [patch v6 16/21] sched: pull all tasks from source group Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:35 ` [patch v6 17/21] sched: no balance for prefer_sibling in power scheduling Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:35 ` [patch v6 18/21] sched: add new members of sd_lb_stats Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:35 ` [patch v6 19/21] sched: power aware load balance Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:35 ` [patch v6 20/21] sched: lazy power balance Alex Shi
2013-03-30 14:35 ` [patch v6 21/21] sched: don't do power balance on share cpu power domain Alex Shi
2013-04-01 5:05 ` [patch v6 0/21] sched: power aware scheduling Michael Wang
2013-04-01 6:17 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-01 6:20 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-03 8:17 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-04 0:57 ` Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1364654108-16307-13-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®