mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] workqueue: simplify workqueue_cpu_up_callback(CPU_ONLINE)
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:05:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365041143-3088-4-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365041143-3088-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

If we have 4096 CPUs, workqueue_cpu_up_callback() will travel too much CPUs,
to avoid it, we use for_each_cpu_worker_pool() for the cpu pools and
use for_each_unbound_pool() for unbound pools.

After it, for_each_pool() becomes unused, but we keep it for future
possible usage.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c |   53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index b4369de..a383eaf 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -354,6 +354,23 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
 		else
 
 /**
+ * for_each_unbound_pool - iterate through all unbound worker_pools in the system
+ * @pool: iteration cursor
+ * @bkt: bucket (of integer) used for iteration
+ *
+ * This must be called either with wq_pool_mutex held or sched RCU read
+ * locked.  If the pool needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the
+ * caller is responsible for guaranteeing that the pool stays online.
+ *
+ * The if/else clause exists only for the lockdep assertion and can be
+ * ignored.
+ */
+#define for_each_unbound_pool(pool, bkt)				\
+	hash_for_each(unbound_pool_hash, bkt, pool, hash_node)		\
+		if (({ assert_rcu_or_pool_mutex(); false; })) { }	\
+		else
+
+/**
  * for_each_pool_worker - iterate through all workers of a worker_pool
  * @worker: iteration cursor
  * @wi: integer used for iteration
@@ -4442,7 +4459,7 @@ static void associate_cpu_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
 	struct worker *worker;
 	int wi;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
 
 	/*
 	 * Restore CPU affinity of all workers.  As all idle workers should
@@ -4454,7 +4471,7 @@ static void associate_cpu_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
 	for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool)
 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task,
 				pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0))
-			return;
+			goto out_unlock;
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
@@ -4495,6 +4512,9 @@ static void associate_cpu_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
 
 	pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
 	spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
+
+out_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -4509,25 +4529,28 @@ static void associate_cpu_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
  */
 static void restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(struct worker_pool *pool, int cpu)
 {
-	static cpumask_t cpumask;
+	static cpumask_t cpumask; /* protected by wq_pool_mutex */
 	struct worker *worker;
 	int wi;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
 
 	/* is @cpu allowed for @pool? */
 	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, pool->attrs->cpumask))
-		return;
+		goto out_unlock;
 
 	/* is @cpu the only online CPU? */
 	cpumask_and(&cpumask, pool->attrs->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
 	if (cpumask_weight(&cpumask) != 1)
-		return;
+		goto out_unlock;
 
 	/* as we're called from CPU_ONLINE, the following shouldn't fail */
 	for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool)
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task,
 						  pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
+
+out_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -4541,7 +4564,7 @@ static int __cpuinit workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 	int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
 	struct worker_pool *pool;
 	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
-	int pi;
+	int bkt;
 
 	switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
 	case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
@@ -4555,19 +4578,13 @@ static int __cpuinit workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 
 	case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
 	case CPU_ONLINE:
-		mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+		for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu)
+			associate_cpu_pool(pool);
 
-		for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
-			mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
-
-			if (pool->cpu == cpu) {
-				associate_cpu_pool(pool);
-			} else if (pool->cpu < 0) {
-				restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(pool, cpu);
-			}
+		mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
-			mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
-		}
+		for_each_unbound_pool(pool, bkt)
+			restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(pool, cpu);
 
 		/* update NUMA affinity of unbound workqueues */
 		list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list)
-- 
1.7.7.6


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-04  2:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-04  2:05 [PATCH 1/7] workqueue: add __WQ_FREEZING and remove POOL_FREEZING Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04  2:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] workqueue: set __WQ_FREEZING only when freezable Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04  2:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] workqueue: rename rebind_workers() to associate_cpu_pool() Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04 14:15   ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-04  2:05 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2013-04-04  2:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] workqueue, use default pwq when fail to allocate node pwd Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04 14:34   ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-04  2:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] workqueue: node-awared allocation for unbound pool Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04 14:38   ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-04  2:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] workqueue: avoid false negative WARN_ON() Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04 14:55   ` [PATCH] workqueue: avoid false negative WARN_ON() in destroy_workqueue() Tejun Heo
2013-04-05  7:39     ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04 14:12 ` [PATCH 1/7] workqueue: add __WQ_FREEZING and remove POOL_FREEZING Tejun Heo
2013-04-20 16:12   ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-21  1:29     ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-25  9:56       ` [PATCH] " Lai Jiangshan
2014-03-27 12:08         ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-03-27 14:48           ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-16 19:51         ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-16 23:58           ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-17 15:29             ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-16 20:50         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1365041143-3088-4-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®