mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] workqueue, use default pwq when fail to allocate node pwd
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 07:34:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130404143412.GH9425@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365041143-3088-5-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:05:36AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> When we fail to allocate the node pwq, we can use the default pwq
> for the node.
> 
> Thus we can avoid failure after allocated default pwq, and remove
> some code for failure path.

I don't know about this one.  The reason why we fall back to the
default one during CPU UP/DONW is because we don't want to interfere
with CPU hotplug which doesn't really have much to do with specific
workqueues and shouldn't fail even when things go pretty hairy -
e.g. if the user turned off the screen of his/her phone or a laptop is
thrown into the backpack with lid closed, CPU_DOWNs during suspend
better not fail from memory allocation.

apply_workqueue_attrs() is different.  We *want* to notify the issuer
that something went wrong affnd the action requested couldn't be
fulfilled in full.  We don't want to hide a failure.  It'll show up as
a silent performance degradation that nobody knows why it's happening.

So, nope, doesn't look like a good idea to me.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-04 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-04  2:05 [PATCH 1/7] workqueue: add __WQ_FREEZING and remove POOL_FREEZING Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04  2:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] workqueue: set __WQ_FREEZING only when freezable Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04  2:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] workqueue: rename rebind_workers() to associate_cpu_pool() Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04 14:15   ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-04  2:05 ` [PATCH 4/7] workqueue: simplify workqueue_cpu_up_callback(CPU_ONLINE) Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04  2:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] workqueue, use default pwq when fail to allocate node pwd Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04 14:34   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-04-04  2:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] workqueue: node-awared allocation for unbound pool Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04 14:38   ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-04  2:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] workqueue: avoid false negative WARN_ON() Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04 14:55   ` [PATCH] workqueue: avoid false negative WARN_ON() in destroy_workqueue() Tejun Heo
2013-04-05  7:39     ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04 14:12 ` [PATCH 1/7] workqueue: add __WQ_FREEZING and remove POOL_FREEZING Tejun Heo
2013-04-20 16:12   ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-21  1:29     ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-25  9:56       ` [PATCH] " Lai Jiangshan
2014-03-27 12:08         ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-03-27 14:48           ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-16 19:51         ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-16 23:58           ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-17 15:29             ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-16 20:50         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130404143412.GH9425@htj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®