mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] checkpatch: add a rule to check devinitconst mistakes
@ 2013-04-21  3:33 Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2013-04-21  3:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: apw; +Cc: linux-kernel, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Check for const __devinitdata and non const __devinitconst

People get this regularly wrong and it breaks the LTO builds,
as it causes a section attribute conflict.

This doesn't catch all mistakes -- spreading over multiple lines,
getting const pointers wrong, but hopefully the common ones.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl |    9 +++++++++
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 4de4bc4..579f92d 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -2466,6 +2466,15 @@ sub process {
 			 "missing space after $1 definition\n" . $herecurr);
 		}
 
+# check for __devinitdata with const or const without __devintconst
+# XXX should scan multiple lines and handle misplaced consts for pointers
+		if ($line =~ /const/ && $line =~ /__(dev)?initdata/) {
+		    ERROR("DEVINITCONST", "const init definition must use __devinitconst");
+		}
+		if ($line =~ /__(dev)?initconst/ && $line !~ /\Wconst\W/) {
+		    ERROR("DEVINITCONST", "__devinitconst must have have const definition");
+		}
+
 # check for spacing round square brackets; allowed:
 #  1. with a type on the left -- int [] a;
 #  2. at the beginning of a line for slice initialisers -- [0...10] = 5,
-- 
1.7.7.6


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add a rule to check devinitconst mistakes
  2013-08-05 22:10 Andi Kleen
@ 2013-08-05 23:30 ` Joe Perches
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2013-08-05 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: apw, linux-kernel, Andi Kleen

On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 15:10 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Check for const __devinitdata and non const __devinitconst
> 
> People get this regularly wrong and it breaks the LTO builds,
> as it causes a section attribute conflict.
> 
> This doesn't catch all mistakes -- spreading over multiple lines,
> getting const pointers wrong, but hopefully the common ones.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 2ee9eb7..5d68d9c 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -2676,6 +2676,15 @@ sub process {
>  			}
>  		}
>  
> +# check for __devinitdata with const or const without __devintconst
> +# XXX should scan multiple lines and handle misplaced consts for pointers
> +		if ($line =~ /const/ && $line =~ /__(dev)?initdata/) {
> +		    ERROR("DEVINITCONST", "const init definition must use __devinitconst");
> +		}
> +		if ($line =~ /__(dev)?initconst/ && $line !~ /\Wconst\W/) {

There are no more uses of __devinitconst and
__devinitdata in the tree.

Shouldn't these be "\bconst\b", "\b__initdata\b"
and "\b__initconst\b"

I think also there'll be a few too many false
positives for function arguments.

It seems that every use of __initconst is of
the form

[static] const <type> [name] __initconst so

	if ($line =~ /\b__initconst\b/ &&
	    $line !~ /^\+\s*(?:static\b)?\s*const\s+$Type\s*(?:$Ident)?\s*__initconst\b/) {
		etc...
	}

should work reasonably well.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] checkpatch: add a rule to check devinitconst mistakes
@ 2013-08-05 22:10 Andi Kleen
  2013-08-05 23:30 ` Joe Perches
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2013-08-05 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: apw; +Cc: joe, linux-kernel, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Check for const __devinitdata and non const __devinitconst

People get this regularly wrong and it breaks the LTO builds,
as it causes a section attribute conflict.

This doesn't catch all mistakes -- spreading over multiple lines,
getting const pointers wrong, but hopefully the common ones.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 2ee9eb7..5d68d9c 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -2676,6 +2676,15 @@ sub process {
 			}
 		}
 
+# check for __devinitdata with const or const without __devintconst
+# XXX should scan multiple lines and handle misplaced consts for pointers
+		if ($line =~ /const/ && $line =~ /__(dev)?initdata/) {
+		    ERROR("DEVINITCONST", "const init definition must use __devinitconst");
+		}
+		if ($line =~ /__(dev)?initconst/ && $line !~ /\Wconst\W/) {
+		    ERROR("DEVINITCONST", "__devinitconst must have have const definition");
+		}
+
 # check for spacing round square brackets; allowed:
 #  1. with a type on the left -- int [] a;
 #  2. at the beginning of a line for slice initialisers -- [0...10] = 5,
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-08-05 23:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-04-21  3:33 [PATCH] checkpatch: add a rule to check devinitconst mistakes Andi Kleen
2013-08-05 22:10 Andi Kleen
2013-08-05 23:30 ` Joe Perches

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®