[PATCH 1/1] net: Fix a typo in comment in ip_tunnels.h

[PATCH 1/1] net: Fix a typo in comment in ip_tunnels.h

[Boian Bonev]

Trivial typo fix

Signed-off-by: Boian Bonev <bbonev@ipacct.com>
---
I am new around and decided to start with something simple to test the process.

The fix applies both to net and net-next.

 include/net/ip_tunnels.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/net/ip_tunnels.h b/include/net/ip_tunnels.h
index 4b6f0b2..2b19fb6 100644
--- a/include/net/ip_tunnels.h
+++ b/include/net/ip_tunnels.h
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static inline u8 ip_tunnel_get_dsfield(const struct iphdr *iph,
 		return 0;
 }
 
-/* Propogate ECN bits out */
+/* Propagate ECN bits out */
 static inline u8 ip_tunnel_ecn_encap(u8 tos, const struct iphdr *iph,
 				     const struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-- 
1.7.9.5

Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: Fix a typo in comment in ip_tunnels.h

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Boian Bonev <bbonev@ipacct.com> wrote:
> Trivial typo fix

Patch looks okay.
Perhaps in future trivial@kernel.org is suitable better for such fixes.

> I am new around and decided to start with something simple to test the process.
> The fix applies both to net and net-next.

Good. May be you are also interesting to run / contribute to the
codespell tool [1].

[1] https://github.com/lucasdemarchi/codespell

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: Fix a typo in comment in ip_tunnels.h

[Boian Bonev]

Hi,

> Patch looks okay.
> Perhaps in future trivial@kernel.org is suitable better for such fixes.

Thanks for the hint for trivial@kernel.org

>> I am new around and decided to start with something simple to test the process.
>> The fix applies both to net and net-next.
>
> Good. May be you are also interesting to run / contribute to the
> codespell tool [1].

No, I am more interested in playing with code rather than running
spellchecker over source comments :)

I stumbled upon this one while converting some tunnel related patches
for 3.2.x to net-next and used the opportunity for test. Just now
writing a RFC email because I think that my changes require
discussion/approval prior to submitting patches. And not to leave you
curious what I am working on - https://github.com/bbonev/eoip

With best regards,
b.