From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
sbw@mit.edu, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC nohz_full v2 7/7] nohz_full: Force RCU's grace-period kthreads onto timekeeping CPU
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:10:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1372450222-19420-7-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372450222-19420-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Because RCU's quiescent-state-forcing mechanism is used to drive the
full-system-idle state machine, and because this mechanism is executed
by RCU's grace-period kthreads, this commit forces these kthreads to
run on the timekeeping CPU (tick_do_timer_cpu). To do otherwise would
mean that the RCU grace-period kthreads would force the system into
non-idle state every time they drove the state machine, which would
be just a bit on the futile side.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 1 +
kernel/rcutree.h | 1 +
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 06cfd75..ad9a5ec 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1286,6 +1286,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
struct rcu_data *rdp;
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
+ rcu_bind_gp_kthread();
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
rsp->gp_flags = 0; /* Clear all flags: New grace period. */
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index 7326a3c..1602c21 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -558,6 +558,7 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_exit(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, int irq);
static void rcu_sysidle_check_cpu(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool *isidle,
unsigned long *maxj);
static bool is_sysidle_rcu_state(struct rcu_state *rsp);
+static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void);
static void rcu_sysidle_report(struct rcu_state *rsp, int isidle,
unsigned long maxj);
static void rcu_sysidle_init_percpu_data(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp);
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index 9b60df5..4478cfd 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -2543,7 +2543,7 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_check_cpu(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool *isidle,
if (!*isidle || rdp->rsp != rcu_sysidle_state ||
cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu) || rdp->cpu == tick_do_timer_cpu)
return;
- /* WARN_ON_ONCE(smp_processor_id() != tick_do_timer_cpu); */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(smp_processor_id() != tick_do_timer_cpu);
/*
* Pick up current idle and NMI-nesting counters, check. We check
@@ -2577,6 +2577,20 @@ static bool is_sysidle_rcu_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
}
/*
+ * Bind the grace-period kthread for the sysidle flavor of RCU to the
+ * timekeeping CPU.
+ */
+static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void)
+{
+ int cpu = ACCESS_ONCE(tick_do_timer_cpu);
+
+ if (cpu < 0 || cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+ return;
+ if (raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu)
+ set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(cpu));
+}
+
+/*
* Return a delay in jiffies based on the number of CPUs, rcu_node
* leaf fanout, and jiffies tick rate. The idea is to allow larger
* systems more time to transition to full-idle state in order to
@@ -2744,6 +2758,10 @@ static bool is_sysidle_rcu_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
return false;
}
+static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void)
+{
+}
+
static void rcu_sysidle_report(struct rcu_state *rsp, int isidle,
unsigned long maxj)
{
--
1.8.1.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-28 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-28 20:09 [PATCH RFC nohz_full 0/7] v2 Provide infrastructure for full-system idle Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-28 20:10 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full v2 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-28 20:10 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full v2 2/7] nohz_full: Add rcu_dyntick data " Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 15:31 ` Josh Triplett
2013-07-01 15:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 18:16 ` Josh Triplett
2013-07-01 18:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 18:34 ` Josh Triplett
2013-07-01 19:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-02 5:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-07-02 5:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-28 20:10 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full v2 3/7] nohz_full: Add per-CPU idle-state tracking Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 15:33 ` Josh Triplett
2013-06-28 20:10 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full v2 4/7] nohz_full: Add full-system idle states and variables Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-28 20:10 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full v2 5/7] nohz_full: Add full-system-idle arguments to API Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-28 20:10 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full v2 6/7] nohz_full: Add full-system-idle state machine Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 16:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-01 18:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 20:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-01 16:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-01 18:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 21:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-01 22:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-28 20:10 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-07-01 15:19 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 0/7] v2 Provide infrastructure for full-system idle Andi Kleen
2013-07-01 16:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 16:19 ` Andi Kleen
2013-07-01 19:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 19:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-07-01 19:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 20:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-07-01 20:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1372450222-19420-7-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sbw@mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®