From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, sbw@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC nohz_full v2 6/7] nohz_full: Add full-system-idle state machine
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:35:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130701163529.GO7246@somewhere.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372450222-19420-6-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:10:21PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> /*
> + * Unconditionally force exit from full system-idle state. This is
> + * invoked when a normal CPU exits idle, but must be called separately
> + * for the timekeeping CPU (tick_do_timer_cpu). The reason for this
> + * is that the timekeeping CPU is permitted to take scheduling-clock
> + * interrupts while the system is in system-idle state, and of course
> + * rcu_sysidle_exit() has no way of distinguishing a scheduling-clock
> + * interrupt from any other type of interrupt.
> + */
> +void rcu_sysidle_force_exit(void)
> +{
> + int oldstate = ACCESS_ONCE(full_sysidle_state);
> + int newoldstate;
> +
> + /*
> + * Each pass through the following loop attempts to exit full
> + * system-idle state. If contention proves to be a problem,
> + * a trylock-based contention tree could be used here.
> + */
> + while (oldstate > RCU_SYSIDLE_SHORT) {
> + newoldstate = cmpxchg(&full_sysidle_state,
> + oldstate, RCU_SYSIDLE_NOT);
> + if (oldstate == newoldstate &&
> + oldstate == RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL_NOTED) {
> + rcu_kick_nohz_cpu(tick_do_timer_cpu);
> + return; /* We cleared it, done! */
> + }
> + oldstate = newoldstate;
> + }
> + smp_mb(); /* Order initial oldstate fetch vs. later non-idle work. */
> +}
> +
> +/*
> * Invoked to note entry to irq or task transition from idle. Note that
> * usermode execution does -not- count as idle here! The caller must
> * have disabled interrupts.
> @@ -2474,6 +2506,214 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_exit(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, int irq)
> atomic_inc(&rdtp->dynticks_idle);
> smp_mb__after_atomic_inc();
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks_idle) & 0x1));
> +
> + /*
> + * If we are the timekeeping CPU, we are permitted to be non-idle
> + * during a system-idle state. This must be the case, because
> + * the timekeeping CPU has to take scheduling-clock interrupts
> + * during the time that the system is transitioning to full
> + * system-idle state. This means that the timekeeping CPU must
> + * invoke rcu_sysidle_force_exit() directly if it does anything
> + * more than take a scheduling-clock interrupt.
> + */
> + if (smp_processor_id() == tick_do_timer_cpu)
> + return;
> +
> + /* Update system-idle state: We are clearly no longer fully idle! */
> + rcu_sysidle_force_exit();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Check to see if the current CPU is idle. Note that usermode execution
> + * does not count as idle. The caller must have disabled interrupts.
> + */
> +static void rcu_sysidle_check_cpu(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool *isidle,
> + unsigned long *maxj)
> +{
> + int cur;
> + int curnmi;
> + unsigned long j;
> + struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = rdp->dynticks;
> +
> + /*
> + * If some other CPU has already reported non-idle, if this is
> + * not the flavor of RCU that tracks sysidle state, or if this
> + * is an offline or the timekeeping CPU, nothing to do.
> + */
> + if (!*isidle || rdp->rsp != rcu_sysidle_state ||
> + cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu) || rdp->cpu == tick_do_timer_cpu)
> + return;
> + /* WARN_ON_ONCE(smp_processor_id() != tick_do_timer_cpu); */
> +
> + /*
> + * Pick up current idle and NMI-nesting counters, check. We check
> + * for NMIs using RCU's main ->dynticks counter. This works because
> + * any time ->dynticks has its low bit set, ->dynticks_idle will
> + * too -- unless the only reason that ->dynticks's low bit is set
> + * is due to an NMI from idle. Which is exactly the case we need
> + * to account for.
> + */
> + cur = atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks_idle);
> + curnmi = atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks);
> + if ((cur & 0x1) || (curnmi & 0x1)) {
I think you wanted to ignore NMIs this time because they don't read walltime?
By the way they can still read jiffies, but unlike irq_enter(), nmi_enter()
don't catch up with missing jiffies update. So the behaviour doesn't change
compared to !NO_HZ_FULL.
> + *isidle = 0; /* We are not idle! */
> + return;
> + }
> + smp_mb(); /* Read counters before timestamps. */
> +
> + /* Pick up timestamps. */
> + j = ACCESS_ONCE(rdtp->dynticks_idle_jiffies);
> + /* If this CPU entered idle more recently, update maxj timestamp. */
> + if (ULONG_CMP_LT(*maxj, j))
> + *maxj = j;
So I'm a bit confused with the ordering so I'm probably going to ask a silly question.
What makes sure that we are not reading a stale value of rdtp->dynticks_idle
in the following scenario:
CPU 0 CPU 1
//CPU 1 idle
//rdtp(1)->dynticks_idle == 0
sysidle_check_cpu(CPU 1) {
rdtp(1)->dynticks_idle == 0
}
cmpxchg(full_sysidle_state,
...RCU_SYSIDLE_SHORT)
rcu_irq_exit() {
rdtp(1)->dynticks_idle = 1
smp_mb()
rcu_sysidle_force_exit() {
full_sysidle_state == RCU_SYSIDLE_SHORT
// no cmpxchg
smp_mb()
...
[1]
sysidle_check_cpu(CPU 1) {
rdtp(1)->dynticks_idle == 0
}
cmpxchg(RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL, ...)
[2]
sysidle_check_cpu(CPU 1) {
rdtp(1)->dynticks_idle == 0
}
cmpxchg(RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL_NOTED, ...)
I mean in [1] and [2] I can't see something in the ordering that guarantees that we see
the new value rdtp(1)->dynticks_idle == 1.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-01 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-28 20:09 [PATCH RFC nohz_full 0/7] v2 Provide infrastructure for full-system idle Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-28 20:10 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full v2 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-28 20:10 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full v2 2/7] nohz_full: Add rcu_dyntick data " Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 15:31 ` Josh Triplett
2013-07-01 15:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 18:16 ` Josh Triplett
2013-07-01 18:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 18:34 ` Josh Triplett
2013-07-01 19:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-02 5:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-07-02 5:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-28 20:10 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full v2 3/7] nohz_full: Add per-CPU idle-state tracking Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 15:33 ` Josh Triplett
2013-06-28 20:10 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full v2 4/7] nohz_full: Add full-system idle states and variables Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-28 20:10 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full v2 5/7] nohz_full: Add full-system-idle arguments to API Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-28 20:10 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full v2 6/7] nohz_full: Add full-system-idle state machine Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 16:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2013-07-01 18:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 20:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-01 16:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-01 18:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 21:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-01 22:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-28 20:10 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full v2 7/7] nohz_full: Force RCU's grace-period kthreads onto timekeeping CPU Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 15:19 ` [PATCH RFC nohz_full 0/7] v2 Provide infrastructure for full-system idle Andi Kleen
2013-07-01 16:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 16:19 ` Andi Kleen
2013-07-01 19:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 19:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-07-01 19:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-07-01 20:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-07-01 20:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130701163529.GO7246@somewhere.redhat.com \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sbw@mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome