From: "Alexander Shiyan" <shc_work@mail.ru>
To: "Ezequiel Garcia" <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Lior Amsalem" <alior@marvell.com>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Gregory Clement" <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
"Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: Introduce atomic MMIO clear/set
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 16:49:28 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1376138968.556911297@f376.i.mail.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376138582-7550-2-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8, Size: 2590 bytes --]
> Some SoC have MMIO regions that are shared across orthogonal
> subsystems. This commit implements a possible solution for the
> thread-safe access of such regions through a spinlock-protected API
> with clear-set semantics.
>
> Concurrent access is protected with a single spinlock for the
> entire MMIO address space. While this protects shared-registers,
> it also serializes access to unrelated/unshared registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/io.h | 5 +++++
> arch/arm/kernel/io.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> index d070741..c84658d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@
> #define isa_bus_to_virt phys_to_virt
>
> /*
> + * Atomic MMIO-wide IO clear/set
> + */
> +extern void atomic_io_clear_set(void __iomem *reg, u32 clear, u32 set);
> +
> +/*
> * Generic IO read/write. These perform native-endian accesses. Note
> * that some architectures will want to re-define __raw_{read,write}w.
> */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/io.c b/arch/arm/kernel/io.c
> index dcd5b4d..3ab8201 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/io.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/io.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,30 @@
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(__io_lock);
> +
> +/*
> + * Some platforms have MMIO regions that are shared across orthogonal
> + * subsystems. This API implements thread-safe access to such regions
> + * through a spinlock-protected API with clear-set semantics.
> + *
> + * Concurrent access is protected with a single spinlock for the entire MMIO
> + * address space. While this protects shared-registers, it also serializes
> + * access to unrelated/unshared registers.
> + *
> + * Using this API on frequently accessed registers in performance-critical
> + * paths is not recommended, as the spinlock used by this API would become
> + * highly contended.
> + */
> +void atomic_io_clear_set(void __iomem *reg, u32 clear, u32 set)
> +{
> + spin_lock(&__io_lock);
> + writel((readl(reg) & ~clear) | set, reg);
> + spin_unlock(&__io_lock);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(atomic_io_clear_set);
So, one lock is used to all possible registers?
Seems a regmap-mmio can be used for such access.
---
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-10 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-10 12:42 [PATCH 0/3] Introduce atomic MMIO register clear-set Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-10 12:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: Introduce atomic MMIO clear/set Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-10 12:49 ` Alexander Shiyan [this message]
2013-08-10 14:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-10 14:09 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-10 15:43 ` Alexander Shiyan
2013-08-10 15:55 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-12 15:46 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-12 16:44 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 17:09 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-12 18:29 ` Will Deacon
2013-08-19 16:59 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-20 14:32 ` Matt Sealey
2013-08-20 14:52 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-20 15:04 ` Will Deacon
2013-08-10 12:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] clocksource: orion: Use atomic access for shared registers Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-10 12:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] watchdog: " Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1376138968.556911297@f376.i.mail.ru \
--to=shc_work@mail.ru \
--cc=alior@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome