mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC] Coverity 1128444 - Dereference after null check (FORWARD_NULL) in glock.c
@ 2013-11-12 14:53 Geyslan Gregório Bem
  2013-11-12 14:55 ` Steven Whitehouse
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Geyslan Gregório Bem @ 2013-11-12 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: swhiteho; +Cc: cluster-devel, LKML

Hello,

Coverity detected in 'fs/gfs2/glock.c' a possible dereference after
null check. Maybe a positive one.

There is a initial check for possible 'gl' NULL. After that 'gl' is
dereferenced in the looping check by __lockref_is_dead().

What do you think?


1875static int gfs2_glock_iter_next(struct gfs2_glock_iter *gi)
1876{
1877        struct gfs2_glock *gl;
1878
1879        do {
1880                gl = gi->gl;

1. Condition "gl", taking false branch

2. var_compare_op: Comparing "gl" to null implies that "gl" might be null.
1881                if (gl) {
1882                        gi->gl = glock_hash_next(gl);
1883                        gi->nhash++;
1884                } else {

3. Condition "gi->hash >= (32768 /* 1 << 15 */)", taking false branch
1885                        if (gi->hash >= GFS2_GL_HASH_SIZE) {
1886                                rcu_read_unlock();
1887                                return 1;
1888                        }
1889                        gi->gl = glock_hash_chain(gi->hash);
1890                        gi->nhash = 0;
1891                }

4. Condition "gi->gl == NULL", taking true branch

7. Condition "gi->gl == NULL", taking false branch
1892                while (gi->gl == NULL) {
1893                        gi->hash++;

5. Condition "gi->hash >= (32768 /* 1 << 15 */)", taking false branch
1894                        if (gi->hash >= GFS2_GL_HASH_SIZE) {
1895                                rcu_read_unlock();
1896                                return 1;
1897                        }
1898                        gi->gl = glock_hash_chain(gi->hash);
1899                        gi->nhash = 0;

6. Jumping back to the beginning of the loop
1900                }
1901        /* Skip entries for other sb and dead entries */

8. Condition "gi->sdp != gi->gl->gl_sbd", taking false branch

CID 1128444 (#1 of 1): Dereference after null check (FORWARD_NULL)9.
var_deref_model: Passing null pointer "&gl->gl_lockref" to function
"__lockref_is_dead(struct lockref const *)", which dereferences
it.[show details]
1902        } while (gi->sdp != gi->gl->gl_sbd ||
__lockref_is_dead(&gl->gl_lockref));
1903
1904        return 0;
1905}

-- 
Regards,

Geyslan G. Bem
hackingbits.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] Coverity 1128444 - Dereference after null check (FORWARD_NULL) in glock.c
  2013-11-12 14:53 [RFC] Coverity 1128444 - Dereference after null check (FORWARD_NULL) in glock.c Geyslan Gregório Bem
@ 2013-11-12 14:55 ` Steven Whitehouse
  2013-11-12 14:58   ` Geyslan Gregório Bem
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steven Whitehouse @ 2013-11-12 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geyslan Gregório Bem; +Cc: cluster-devel, LKML

Hi,

On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 12:53 -0200, Geyslan Gregório Bem wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Coverity detected in 'fs/gfs2/glock.c' a possible dereference after
> null check. Maybe a positive one.
> 
> There is a initial check for possible 'gl' NULL. After that 'gl' is
> dereferenced in the looping check by __lockref_is_dead().
> 
> What do you think?
> 
I've already been sent a patch for that, and its in the GFS2 -fixes
tree. Thanks,

Steve.

> 
> 1875static int gfs2_glock_iter_next(struct gfs2_glock_iter *gi)
> 1876{
> 1877        struct gfs2_glock *gl;
> 1878
> 1879        do {
> 1880                gl = gi->gl;
> 
> 1. Condition "gl", taking false branch
> 
> 2. var_compare_op: Comparing "gl" to null implies that "gl" might be null.
> 1881                if (gl) {
> 1882                        gi->gl = glock_hash_next(gl);
> 1883                        gi->nhash++;
> 1884                } else {
> 
> 3. Condition "gi->hash >= (32768 /* 1 << 15 */)", taking false branch
> 1885                        if (gi->hash >= GFS2_GL_HASH_SIZE) {
> 1886                                rcu_read_unlock();
> 1887                                return 1;
> 1888                        }
> 1889                        gi->gl = glock_hash_chain(gi->hash);
> 1890                        gi->nhash = 0;
> 1891                }
> 
> 4. Condition "gi->gl == NULL", taking true branch
> 
> 7. Condition "gi->gl == NULL", taking false branch
> 1892                while (gi->gl == NULL) {
> 1893                        gi->hash++;
> 
> 5. Condition "gi->hash >= (32768 /* 1 << 15 */)", taking false branch
> 1894                        if (gi->hash >= GFS2_GL_HASH_SIZE) {
> 1895                                rcu_read_unlock();
> 1896                                return 1;
> 1897                        }
> 1898                        gi->gl = glock_hash_chain(gi->hash);
> 1899                        gi->nhash = 0;
> 
> 6. Jumping back to the beginning of the loop
> 1900                }
> 1901        /* Skip entries for other sb and dead entries */
> 
> 8. Condition "gi->sdp != gi->gl->gl_sbd", taking false branch
> 
> CID 1128444 (#1 of 1): Dereference after null check (FORWARD_NULL)9.
> var_deref_model: Passing null pointer "&gl->gl_lockref" to function
> "__lockref_is_dead(struct lockref const *)", which dereferences
> it.[show details]
> 1902        } while (gi->sdp != gi->gl->gl_sbd ||
> __lockref_is_dead(&gl->gl_lockref));
> 1903
> 1904        return 0;
> 1905}
> 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] Coverity 1128444 - Dereference after null check (FORWARD_NULL) in glock.c
  2013-11-12 14:55 ` Steven Whitehouse
@ 2013-11-12 14:58   ` Geyslan Gregório Bem
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Geyslan Gregório Bem @ 2013-11-12 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven Whitehouse; +Cc: cluster-devel, LKML

2013/11/12 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 12:53 -0200, Geyslan Gregório Bem wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Coverity detected in 'fs/gfs2/glock.c' a possible dereference after
>> null check. Maybe a positive one.
>>
>> There is a initial check for possible 'gl' NULL. After that 'gl' is
>> dereferenced in the looping check by __lockref_is_dead().
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
> I've already been sent a patch for that, and its in the GFS2 -fixes
> tree. Thanks,
>
> Steve.

Steve, thanks.

I'll close it in Coverity.

>
>>
>> 1875static int gfs2_glock_iter_next(struct gfs2_glock_iter *gi)
>> 1876{
>> 1877        struct gfs2_glock *gl;
>> 1878
>> 1879        do {
>> 1880                gl = gi->gl;
>>
>> 1. Condition "gl", taking false branch
>>
>> 2. var_compare_op: Comparing "gl" to null implies that "gl" might be null.
>> 1881                if (gl) {
>> 1882                        gi->gl = glock_hash_next(gl);
>> 1883                        gi->nhash++;
>> 1884                } else {
>>
>> 3. Condition "gi->hash >= (32768 /* 1 << 15 */)", taking false branch
>> 1885                        if (gi->hash >= GFS2_GL_HASH_SIZE) {
>> 1886                                rcu_read_unlock();
>> 1887                                return 1;
>> 1888                        }
>> 1889                        gi->gl = glock_hash_chain(gi->hash);
>> 1890                        gi->nhash = 0;
>> 1891                }
>>
>> 4. Condition "gi->gl == NULL", taking true branch
>>
>> 7. Condition "gi->gl == NULL", taking false branch
>> 1892                while (gi->gl == NULL) {
>> 1893                        gi->hash++;
>>
>> 5. Condition "gi->hash >= (32768 /* 1 << 15 */)", taking false branch
>> 1894                        if (gi->hash >= GFS2_GL_HASH_SIZE) {
>> 1895                                rcu_read_unlock();
>> 1896                                return 1;
>> 1897                        }
>> 1898                        gi->gl = glock_hash_chain(gi->hash);
>> 1899                        gi->nhash = 0;
>>
>> 6. Jumping back to the beginning of the loop
>> 1900                }
>> 1901        /* Skip entries for other sb and dead entries */
>>
>> 8. Condition "gi->sdp != gi->gl->gl_sbd", taking false branch
>>
>> CID 1128444 (#1 of 1): Dereference after null check (FORWARD_NULL)9.
>> var_deref_model: Passing null pointer "&gl->gl_lockref" to function
>> "__lockref_is_dead(struct lockref const *)", which dereferences
>> it.[show details]
>> 1902        } while (gi->sdp != gi->gl->gl_sbd ||
>> __lockref_is_dead(&gl->gl_lockref));
>> 1903
>> 1904        return 0;
>> 1905}
>>
>
>

-- 
Regards,

Geyslan G. Bem
hackingbits.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-12 14:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-12 14:53 [RFC] Coverity 1128444 - Dereference after null check (FORWARD_NULL) in glock.c Geyslan Gregório Bem
2013-11-12 14:55 ` Steven Whitehouse
2013-11-12 14:58   ` Geyslan Gregório Bem

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®