mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, alan@linux.intel.com, acme@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:core/urgent] MAINTAINERS: Restore "L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" entries
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:47:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1390412846.31946.68.camel@joe-AO722> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140122173622.GA12023@gmail.com>

On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 18:36 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> 
> > Your main argument is that some people don't cc lkml
> > because section entries don't specify it explicitly.
> 
> No, my main argument continues to be that having a 'at a glance' 
> contact summary _in a single place_ is eminently useful to humans, 
> because it's so simple:

I don't doubt simplicity is good.

> You never even 
> _acknowledged_ my main point, let alone countered it successfully. 

There's no 'counter' to it.

You simply don't seem to agree that some people will
choose _not_ to cc lkml when some sections have it and
others sections don't.

> Hence you came up with this false 'conclusion' prematurely and 
> presented it with baseless, cocky self-confidence.

> What an annoyingly unproductive waste of time.

Any discussion where someone disagrees with you seems
to end with you asserting that.  I doubt it's true.

> Thanks,

Anytime.

cheers, Joe



  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-22 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-21 15:49 tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2014-01-21 17:24 ` Joe Perches
2014-01-22 12:27   ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-22 13:02     ` Joe Perches
2014-01-22 16:09       ` Mark Brown
2014-01-22 17:30         ` Joe Perches
2014-01-22 18:06           ` Mark Brown
2014-01-22 18:18             ` Joe Perches
2014-01-22 17:36       ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-22 17:47         ` Joe Perches [this message]
2014-01-22 12:27 tip-bot for Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1390412846.31946.68.camel@joe-AO722 \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®