mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block devices: validate block device capacity
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:49:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1391122163.2181.103.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1401301531040.29912@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>

On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 15:40 -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> When running the LVM2 testsuite on 32-bit kernel, there are unkillable
> processes stuck in the kernel consuming 100% CPU:
> blkid           R running      0  2005   1409 0x00000004
> ce009d00 00000082 ffffffcf c11280ba 00000060 560b5dfd 00003111 00fe41cb
> 00000000 ce009d00 00000000 d51cfeb0 00000000 0000001e 00000002 ffffffff
> 00000002 c10748c1 00000002 c106cca4 00000000 00000000 ffffffff 00000000
> Call Trace:
> [<c11280ba>] ? radix_tree_next_chunk+0xda/0x2c0
> [<c10748c1>] ? release_pages+0x61/0x160
> [<c106cca4>] ? find_get_pages+0x84/0x100
> [<c1251fbe>] ? _cond_resched+0x1e/0x40
> [<c10758cb>] ? truncate_inode_pages_range+0x12b/0x440
> [<c1075cb7>] ? truncate_inode_pages+0x17/0x20
> [<c10cf2ba>] ? __blkdev_put+0x3a/0x140
> [<c10d02db>] ? blkdev_close+0x1b/0x40
> [<c10a60b2>] ? __fput+0x72/0x1c0
> [<c1039461>] ? task_work_run+0x61/0xa0
> [<c1253b6f>] ? work_notifysig+0x24/0x35
> 
> This is caused by the fact that the LVM2 testsuite creates 64TB device.
> The kernel uses "unsigned long" to index pages in files and block devices,
> on 64TB device "unsigned long" overflows (it can address up to 16TB with
> 4k pages), causing the infinite loop.

Why is this?  the whole reason for CONFIG_LBDAF is supposed to be to
allow 64 bit offsets for block devices on 32 bit.  It sounds like
there's somewhere not using sector_t ... or using it wrongly which needs
fixing.

> On 32-bit architectures, we must limit block device size to
> PAGE_SIZE*(2^32-1).

So you're saying CONFIG_LBDAF can never work, why?

James




  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-30 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-30 20:40 Mikulas Patocka
2014-01-30 22:49 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2014-01-30 23:10   ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-01-30 23:37     ` James Bottomley
2014-01-31  0:20       ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-01-31  1:43         ` James Bottomley
2014-01-31  2:43           ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-01-31  5:45             ` James Bottomley
2014-01-31  8:20               ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-02-03  8:15                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-03 20:22                   ` Mikulas Patocka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1391122163.2181.103.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=msnitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®