mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: alex.shi@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 2/3] sched: Fix race in idle_balance()
Date: Thu,  6 Feb 2014 23:10:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1391728237-4441-3-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391728237-4441-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>

The scheduler main function 'schedule()' checks if there are no more tasks
on the runqueue. Then it checks if a task should be pulled in the current
runqueue in idle_balance() assuming it will go to idle otherwise.

But the idle_balance() releases the rq->lock in order to lookup in the sched
domains and takes the lock again right after. That opens a window where
another cpu may put a task in our runqueue, so we won't go to idle but
we have filled the idle_stamp, thinking we will.

This patch closes the window by checking if the runqueue has been modified
but without pulling a task after taking the lock again, so we won't go to idle
right after in the __schedule() function.

Cc: alex.shi@linaro.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |    7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 428bc9d..5ebc681 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6589,6 +6589,13 @@ void idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
 
 	raw_spin_lock(&this_rq->lock);
 
+	/*
+	 * While browsing the domains, we released the rq lock.
+	 * A task could have be enqueued in the meantime
+	 */
+	if (this_rq->nr_running && !pulled_task)
+		return;
+
 	if (pulled_task || time_after(jiffies, this_rq->next_balance)) {
 		/*
 		 * We are going idle. next_balance may be set based on
-- 
1.7.9.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-06 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-06 23:10 [PATCH V2 0/3] sched: idle_balance() cleanup and fix Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-06 23:10 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] sched: Remove cpu parameter for idle_balance() Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-13  7:14   ` Alex Shi
2014-02-06 23:10 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2014-02-10  9:24   ` [PATCH V2 2/3] sched: Fix race in idle_balance() Preeti Murthy
2014-02-11 11:11     ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-13  7:45       ` Alex Shi
2014-02-13 10:10         ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-13 10:22           ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-13  7:46   ` Alex Shi
2014-02-06 23:10 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] sched: Move idle_stamp up to the core Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-10 10:04   ` Preeti Murthy
2014-02-11 12:07     ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-13 10:14       ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-13  7:53   ` Alex Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1391728237-4441-3-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=alex.shi@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome