From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: alex.shi@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 3/3] sched: Move idle_stamp up to the core
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 23:10:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1391728237-4441-4-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391728237-4441-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
The idle_balance modifies the idle_stamp field of the rq, making this
information to be shared across core.c and fair.c. As we can know if the
cpu is going to idle or not with the previous patch, let's encapsulate the
idle_stamp information in core.c by moving it up to the caller. The
idle_balance function returns true in case a balancing occured and the cpu
won't be idle, false if no balance happened and the cpu is going idle.
Cc: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: alex.shi@linaro.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 13 +++++++++++--
kernel/sched/fair.c | 14 ++++++--------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 8 +-------
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 16b97dd..428ee4c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2704,8 +2704,17 @@ need_resched:
pre_schedule(rq, prev);
- if (unlikely(!rq->nr_running))
- idle_balance(rq);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ if (unlikely(!rq->nr_running)) {
+ /*
+ * We must set idle_stamp _before_ calling idle_balance(), such
+ * that we measure the duration of idle_balance() as idle time.
+ */
+ rq->idle_stamp = rq_clock(rq);
+ if (idle_balance(rq))
+ rq->idle_stamp = 0;
+ }
+#endif
put_prev_task(rq, prev);
next = pick_next_task(rq);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 5ebc681..04fea77 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6531,7 +6531,7 @@ out:
* idle_balance is called by schedule() if this_cpu is about to become
* idle. Attempts to pull tasks from other CPUs.
*/
-void idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
+int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
{
struct sched_domain *sd;
int pulled_task = 0;
@@ -6539,10 +6539,8 @@ void idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
u64 curr_cost = 0;
int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu;
- this_rq->idle_stamp = rq_clock(this_rq);
-
if (this_rq->avg_idle < sysctl_sched_migration_cost)
- return;
+ return 0;
/*
* Drop the rq->lock, but keep IRQ/preempt disabled.
@@ -6580,10 +6578,8 @@ void idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
interval = msecs_to_jiffies(sd->balance_interval);
if (time_after(next_balance, sd->last_balance + interval))
next_balance = sd->last_balance + interval;
- if (pulled_task) {
- this_rq->idle_stamp = 0;
+ if (pulled_task)
break;
- }
}
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -6594,7 +6590,7 @@ void idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
* A task could have be enqueued in the meantime
*/
if (this_rq->nr_running && !pulled_task)
- return;
+ return 1;
if (pulled_task || time_after(jiffies, this_rq->next_balance)) {
/*
@@ -6606,6 +6602,8 @@ void idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
if (curr_cost > this_rq->max_idle_balance_cost)
this_rq->max_idle_balance_cost = curr_cost;
+
+ return pulled_task;
}
/*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 1436219..c08c070 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1176,17 +1176,11 @@ extern const struct sched_class idle_sched_class;
extern void update_group_power(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu);
extern void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq);
-extern void idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq);
+extern int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq);
extern void idle_enter_fair(struct rq *this_rq);
extern void idle_exit_fair(struct rq *this_rq);
-#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
-
-static inline void idle_balance(struct rq *rq)
-{
-}
-
#endif
extern void sysrq_sched_debug_show(void);
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-06 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-06 23:10 [PATCH V2 0/3] sched: idle_balance() cleanup and fix Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-06 23:10 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] sched: Remove cpu parameter for idle_balance() Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-13 7:14 ` Alex Shi
2014-02-06 23:10 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] sched: Fix race in idle_balance() Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-10 9:24 ` Preeti Murthy
2014-02-11 11:11 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-13 7:45 ` Alex Shi
2014-02-13 10:10 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-13 10:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-13 7:46 ` Alex Shi
2014-02-06 23:10 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2014-02-10 10:04 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] sched: Move idle_stamp up to the core Preeti Murthy
2014-02-11 12:07 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-13 10:14 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-13 7:53 ` Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1391728237-4441-4-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=alex.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome