Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

[Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1225 bytes --]

On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 10:29 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 00:27:21 +0000
> Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 14:49 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > Here's the new patch:
> > 
> > Doesn't add #includes and doesn't change any types, so of course it
> > doesn't compile.  WTF?
> > 
> 
> Hi Ben,
> 
> This is an old thread. Which kernel did you apply it to. Before I send
> any patch set out, I run a small test (heavy stress test, and also
> compile several different configs). This patch was against 3.10-rt, and
> may have already had the includes needed. I know the original patch
> compiled, but I may not have tested the second patch.
> 
> Do you need this patch? Or did I miss something for 3.2-rt?

You applied it to 3.2-rt:

commit 916c8d2de3c4759f57426fa3cfee63b491e88939
Author: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date:   Mon Oct 28 11:50:06 2013 +0100

    swait: Add a few more users

and 3.4-rt, 3.8-rt, 3.10-rt.  So far as I can see, it is broken on all
of those branches, though I only actually tried building 3.2-rt.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Computers are not intelligent.	They only think they are.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]