mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Keith Mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, James Cleverdon <cleverdj@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix for clusterd io_apics
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 08:15:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13960000.1052234101@[10.10.2.4]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1052179450.16886.224.camel@dyn9-47-17-180.beaverton.ibm.com>

>   The following is a patch to fix inconsistent use of the function
> set_ioapic_affinity. In the current kernel it is unclear as to weather
> the value being passed to the function is a cpu mask or valid apic id. 
> In irq_affinity_write_proc the kernel passes on a cpu mask but the kirqd
> thread passes on logical apic ids.  In flat apic mode this is not an
> issue because a cpu mask represents the apic value.  However in
> clustered apic mode the cpu mask is very different from the logical apic
> id.  
>   This is an attempt to do the right thing for clustered apics.  I
> clarify that the value being passed to set_ioapic_affinity is a cpu mask
> not a apicid.  Set_ioapic_affinity will do the conversion to logical
> apic ids.  Since many cpu masks don't map to valid apicids in clustered
> apic mode TARGET_CPUS is used as a default value when such a situation
> occurs.  I think this is a good step in making irq_affinity clustered
> apic safe.

Thanks Keith, looks great. The existing code in the main kernel is just
broken (and confusing as hell with it's mixed use of "mask").

M.


  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-06 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-30 23:07 [RFC] clustered apic irq affinity fix for i386 Keith Mannthey
2003-04-30 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-01  1:05   ` Keith Mannthey
2003-05-01  2:22     ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-01  2:49       ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-01  4:07       ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-01 17:51       ` Keith Mannthey
2003-05-06  0:04       ` [RFC][PATCH] fix for clusterd io_apics Keith Mannthey
2003-05-06 15:15         ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-05-01  9:10   ` [RFC] clustered apic irq affinity fix for i386 Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='13960000.1052234101@[10.10.2.4]' \
    --to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=cleverdj@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®