From: Nadav Amit <namit@cs.technion.ac.il>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: gleb@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nadav Amit <namit@cs.technion.ac.il>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86: bit-ops emulation ignores offset on 64-bit
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 16:12:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1402837982-24959-2-git-send-email-namit@cs.technion.ac.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402837982-24959-1-git-send-email-namit@cs.technion.ac.il>
The current emulation of bit operations ignores the offset from the destination
on 64-bit target memory operands. This patch fixes this behavior.
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@cs.technion.ac.il>
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index e4e833d..f0b0a10 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -1220,12 +1220,14 @@ static void fetch_bit_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
long sv = 0, mask;
if (ctxt->dst.type == OP_MEM && ctxt->src.type == OP_REG) {
- mask = ~(ctxt->dst.bytes * 8 - 1);
+ mask = ~((long)ctxt->dst.bytes * 8 - 1);
if (ctxt->src.bytes == 2)
sv = (s16)ctxt->src.val & (s16)mask;
else if (ctxt->src.bytes == 4)
sv = (s32)ctxt->src.val & (s32)mask;
+ else
+ sv = (s64)ctxt->src.val & (s64)mask;
ctxt->dst.addr.mem.ea += (sv >> 3);
}
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-15 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-15 13:12 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: x86: More emulator bugs Nadav Amit
2014-06-15 13:12 ` Nadav Amit [this message]
2014-06-15 13:12 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: x86: Wrong emulation on 'xadd X, X' Nadav Amit
2014-06-16 17:38 ` Bandan Das
2014-06-17 5:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-17 15:35 ` Bandan Das
2014-06-17 16:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-15 13:12 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86: Inter privilage level ret emulation is not implemeneted Nadav Amit
2014-06-15 13:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: x86: emulation of dword cmov on long-mode should clear [63:32] Nadav Amit
2014-06-15 13:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86: NOP emulation clears (incorrectly) the high 32-bits of RAX Nadav Amit
2014-06-15 13:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: x86: check DR6/7 high-bits are clear only on long-mode Nadav Amit
2014-06-16 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-16 10:33 ` Nadav Amit
2014-06-16 11:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-16 11:53 ` Nadav Amit
2014-06-16 14:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-16 17:07 ` Nadav Amit
2014-06-18 14:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] KVM: x86: More emulator bugs Nadav Amit
2014-06-18 14:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] KVM: x86: bit-ops emulation ignores offset on 64-bit Nadav Amit
2014-06-18 14:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] KVM: x86: Wrong emulation on 'xadd X, X' Nadav Amit
2014-06-18 14:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] KVM: x86: Inter privilage level ret emulation is not implemeneted Nadav Amit
2014-06-18 14:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] KVM: x86: emulation of dword cmov on long-mode should clear [63:32] Nadav Amit
2014-06-18 14:19 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] KVM: x86: NOP emulation clears (incorrectly) the high 32-bits of RAX Nadav Amit
2014-06-18 14:19 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] KVM: x86: check DR6/7 high-bits are clear only on long-mode Nadav Amit
2014-06-18 14:19 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] KVM: x86: Hypercall handling does not considers opsize correctly Nadav Amit
2014-06-18 14:19 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] KVM: vmx: handle_cr ignores 32/64-bit mode Nadav Amit
2014-06-18 14:19 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] KVM: vmx: vmx instructions handling does not consider cs.l Nadav Amit
2014-06-18 15:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 16:01 ` Nadav Amit
2014-06-18 16:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 17:51 ` Nadav Amit
2014-06-19 9:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 15:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] KVM: x86: More emulator bugs Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-16 10:18 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1402837982-24959-2-git-send-email-namit@cs.technion.ac.il \
--to=namit@cs.technion.ac.il \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®