From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com, len.brown@intel.com,
alan.cox@intel.com, mark.gross@intel.com,
morten.rasmussen@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rajeev.d.muralidhar@intel.com,
vishwesh.m.rudramuni@intel.com, nicole.chalhoub@intel.com,
ajaya.durg@intel.com, harinarayanan.seshadri@intel.com,
jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 7/9 v4] Implement Workload Consolidation in idle_balance
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:36:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1403656568-32445-8-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403656568-32445-1-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com>
1) Skip pulling task to the idle non-consolidated CPUs.
2) In addition, for consolidated Idle CPU, we aggressively pull tasks from
non-consolidated CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 008cbc9..bf65fde 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2608,6 +2608,9 @@ static inline void dequeue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
static inline void update_cpu_concurrency(struct rq *rq);
static struct sched_group *wc_find_group(struct sched_domain *sd,
struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu);
+static void wc_unload(struct cpumask *nonshielded, struct sched_domain *sd);
+static void wc_nonshielded_mask(int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd,
+ struct cpumask *mask);
static int cpu_cc_capable(int cpu);
/*
@@ -6808,6 +6811,22 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
update_blocked_averages(this_cpu);
rcu_read_lock();
+
+ sd = per_cpu(sd_wc, this_cpu);
+ if (sd) {
+ struct cpumask *nonshielded_cpus = __get_cpu_var(load_balance_mask);
+
+ cpumask_copy(nonshielded_cpus, cpu_active_mask);
+
+ /*
+ * if we encounter shielded cpus here, don't do balance on them
+ */
+ wc_nonshielded_mask(this_cpu, sd, nonshielded_cpus);
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, nonshielded_cpus))
+ goto unlock;
+ wc_unload(nonshielded_cpus, sd);
+ }
+
for_each_domain(this_cpu, sd) {
int continue_balancing = 1;
u64 t0, domain_cost;
@@ -6843,6 +6862,7 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
if (pulled_task || this_rq->nr_running > 0)
break;
}
+unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
raw_spin_lock(&this_rq->lock);
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-25 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-25 0:35 [RFC PATCH 0/9 v4] A new CPU load metric for power-efficient scheduler: CPU ConCurrency Yuyang Du
2014-06-25 0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9 v4] sched: Remove update_rq_runnable_avg Yuyang Du
2014-06-25 0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9 v4] sched: Precise accumulated time and acount runnable number in update_entity_runnable_avg Yuyang Du
2014-06-25 0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9 v4] How CPU ConCurrency (CC) accrues with runqueue change and time Yuyang Du
2014-06-25 0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9 v4] Define SD_WORKLOAD_CONSOLIDATION and attach to sched_domain Yuyang Du
2014-06-25 0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9 v4] Workload Consolidation: Consolidating workload to a subset of CPUs if possible Yuyang Du
2014-06-25 0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9 v4] Implement Workload Consolidation in wakeup/fork/exec Yuyang Du
2014-06-25 0:36 ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2014-06-25 0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9 v4] Implement Workload Consolidation in nohz_idle_balance Yuyang Du
2014-06-25 0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9 v4] Implement Workload Consolidation in periodic load balance Yuyang Du
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1403656568-32445-8-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com \
--to=yuyang.du@intel.com \
--cc=ajaya.durg@intel.com \
--cc=alan.cox@intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=harinarayanan.seshadri@intel.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.gross@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=nicole.chalhoub@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rajeev.d.muralidhar@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vishwesh.m.rudramuni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®