mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com, len.brown@intel.com,
	alan.cox@intel.com, mark.gross@intel.com,
	morten.rasmussen@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rajeev.d.muralidhar@intel.com,
	vishwesh.m.rudramuni@intel.com, nicole.chalhoub@intel.com,
	ajaya.durg@intel.com, harinarayanan.seshadri@intel.com,
	jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 7/9 v4] Implement Workload Consolidation in idle_balance
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:36:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1403656568-32445-8-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403656568-32445-1-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com>

1) Skip pulling task to the idle non-consolidated CPUs.

2) In addition, for consolidated Idle CPU, we aggressively pull tasks from
   non-consolidated CPUs.

Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 008cbc9..bf65fde 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2608,6 +2608,9 @@ static inline void dequeue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
 static inline void update_cpu_concurrency(struct rq *rq);
 static struct sched_group *wc_find_group(struct sched_domain *sd,
 	struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu);
+static void wc_unload(struct cpumask *nonshielded, struct sched_domain *sd);
+static void wc_nonshielded_mask(int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd,
+	struct cpumask *mask);
 static int cpu_cc_capable(int cpu);
 
 /*
@@ -6808,6 +6811,22 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
 
 	update_blocked_averages(this_cpu);
 	rcu_read_lock();
+
+	sd = per_cpu(sd_wc, this_cpu);
+	if (sd) {
+		struct cpumask *nonshielded_cpus = __get_cpu_var(load_balance_mask);
+
+		cpumask_copy(nonshielded_cpus, cpu_active_mask);
+
+		/*
+		 * if we encounter shielded cpus here, don't do balance on them
+		 */
+		wc_nonshielded_mask(this_cpu, sd, nonshielded_cpus);
+		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, nonshielded_cpus))
+			goto unlock;
+		wc_unload(nonshielded_cpus, sd);
+	}
+
 	for_each_domain(this_cpu, sd) {
 		int continue_balancing = 1;
 		u64 t0, domain_cost;
@@ -6843,6 +6862,7 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
 		if (pulled_task || this_rq->nr_running > 0)
 			break;
 	}
+unlock:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	raw_spin_lock(&this_rq->lock);
-- 
1.7.9.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-25  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-25  0:35 [RFC PATCH 0/9 v4] A new CPU load metric for power-efficient scheduler: CPU ConCurrency Yuyang Du
2014-06-25  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9 v4] sched: Remove update_rq_runnable_avg Yuyang Du
2014-06-25  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9 v4] sched: Precise accumulated time and acount runnable number in update_entity_runnable_avg Yuyang Du
2014-06-25  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9 v4] How CPU ConCurrency (CC) accrues with runqueue change and time Yuyang Du
2014-06-25  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9 v4] Define SD_WORKLOAD_CONSOLIDATION and attach to sched_domain Yuyang Du
2014-06-25  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9 v4] Workload Consolidation: Consolidating workload to a subset of CPUs if possible Yuyang Du
2014-06-25  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9 v4] Implement Workload Consolidation in wakeup/fork/exec Yuyang Du
2014-06-25  0:36 ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2014-06-25  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9 v4] Implement Workload Consolidation in nohz_idle_balance Yuyang Du
2014-06-25  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9 v4] Implement Workload Consolidation in periodic load balance Yuyang Du

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1403656568-32445-8-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com \
    --to=yuyang.du@intel.com \
    --cc=ajaya.durg@intel.com \
    --cc=alan.cox@intel.com \
    --cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=harinarayanan.seshadri@intel.com \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.gross@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=nicole.chalhoub@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rajeev.d.muralidhar@intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vishwesh.m.rudramuni@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®