mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com, len.brown@intel.com,
	alan.cox@intel.com, mark.gross@intel.com,
	morten.rasmussen@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rajeev.d.muralidhar@intel.com,
	vishwesh.m.rudramuni@intel.com, nicole.chalhoub@intel.com,
	ajaya.durg@intel.com, harinarayanan.seshadri@intel.com,
	jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 8/9 v4] Implement Workload Consolidation in nohz_idle_balance
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:36:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1403656568-32445-9-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403656568-32445-1-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com>

In periodic nohz idle balance, we skip kicking idle but non-consolidated CPUs.

Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |   55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index bf65fde..549f6e0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6983,10 +6983,45 @@ static struct {
 
 static inline int find_new_ilb(void)
 {
-	int ilb = cpumask_first(nohz.idle_cpus_mask);
+	int ilb;
 
-	if (ilb < nr_cpu_ids && idle_cpu(ilb))
-		return ilb;
+	/*
+	 * Optimize for the case when we have no idle CPUs or only one
+	 * idle CPU. Don't walk the sched_domain hierarchy in such cases
+	 */
+	if (cpumask_weight(nohz.idle_cpus_mask) < 2)
+		return nr_cpu_ids;
+
+	ilb = cpumask_first(nohz.idle_cpus_mask);
+
+	if (ilb < nr_cpu_ids && idle_cpu(ilb)) {
+		struct sched_domain *sd;
+		int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+		sd = per_cpu(sd_wc, this_cpu);
+		if (sd) {
+			struct cpumask *nonshielded_cpus = __get_cpu_var(load_balance_mask);
+
+			cpumask_copy(nonshielded_cpus, nohz.idle_cpus_mask);
+
+			rcu_read_lock();
+			wc_nonshielded_mask(this_cpu, sd, nonshielded_cpus);
+			rcu_read_unlock();
+
+			if (cpumask_weight(nonshielded_cpus) < 2)
+				return nr_cpu_ids;
+
+			/*
+			 * get idle load balancer again
+			 */
+			ilb = cpumask_first(nonshielded_cpus);
+
+		    if (ilb < nr_cpu_ids && idle_cpu(ilb))
+				return ilb;
+		}
+		else
+			return ilb;
+	}
 
 	return nr_cpu_ids;
 }
@@ -7217,7 +7252,7 @@ out:
  * In CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON case, the idle balance kickee will do the
  * rebalancing for all the cpus for whom scheduler ticks are stopped.
  */
-static void nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
+static void nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle, struct cpumask *mask)
 {
 	int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu;
 	struct rq *rq;
@@ -7227,7 +7262,7 @@ static void nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
 	    !test_bit(NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK, nohz_flags(this_cpu)))
 		goto end;
 
-	for_each_cpu(balance_cpu, nohz.idle_cpus_mask) {
+	for_each_cpu(balance_cpu, mask) {
 		if (balance_cpu == this_cpu || !idle_cpu(balance_cpu))
 			continue;
 
@@ -7280,10 +7315,10 @@ static inline int nohz_kick_needed(struct rq *rq)
 	if (unlikely(rq->idle_balance))
 		return 0;
 
-       /*
-	* We may be recently in ticked or tickless idle mode. At the first
-	* busy tick after returning from idle, we will update the busy stats.
-	*/
+	/*
+	 * We may be recently in ticked or tickless idle mode. At the first
+	 * busy tick after returning from idle, we will update the busy stats.
+	 */
 	set_cpu_sd_state_busy();
 	nohz_balance_exit_idle(cpu);
 
@@ -7326,7 +7361,7 @@ need_kick:
 	return 1;
 }
 #else
-static void nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle) { }
+static void nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle, struct cpumask *mask) { }
 #endif
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.9.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-25  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-25  0:35 [RFC PATCH 0/9 v4] A new CPU load metric for power-efficient scheduler: CPU ConCurrency Yuyang Du
2014-06-25  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9 v4] sched: Remove update_rq_runnable_avg Yuyang Du
2014-06-25  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9 v4] sched: Precise accumulated time and acount runnable number in update_entity_runnable_avg Yuyang Du
2014-06-25  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9 v4] How CPU ConCurrency (CC) accrues with runqueue change and time Yuyang Du
2014-06-25  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9 v4] Define SD_WORKLOAD_CONSOLIDATION and attach to sched_domain Yuyang Du
2014-06-25  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9 v4] Workload Consolidation: Consolidating workload to a subset of CPUs if possible Yuyang Du
2014-06-25  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9 v4] Implement Workload Consolidation in wakeup/fork/exec Yuyang Du
2014-06-25  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9 v4] Implement Workload Consolidation in idle_balance Yuyang Du
2014-06-25  0:36 ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2014-06-25  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9 v4] Implement Workload Consolidation in periodic load balance Yuyang Du

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1403656568-32445-9-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com \
    --to=yuyang.du@intel.com \
    --cc=ajaya.durg@intel.com \
    --cc=alan.cox@intel.com \
    --cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=harinarayanan.seshadri@intel.com \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.gross@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=nicole.chalhoub@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rajeev.d.muralidhar@intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vishwesh.m.rudramuni@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®