mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>
To: "kys@microsoft.com" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"apw@canonical.com" <apw@canonical.com>,
	"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
	"michaelc@cs.wisc.edu" <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ohering@suse.com" <ohering@suse.com>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [SCSI] Fix a bug in deriving the FLUSH_TIMEOUT from the basic I/O timeout
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:57:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1405702633.30262.3.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2d43adebbc47441084d8e1284507a427@BY2PR0301MB0711.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 16:44 +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org) [mailto:hch@infradead.org]
> > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 8:11 AM
> > To: KY Srinivasan
> > Cc: Jens Axboe; James Bottomley; michaelc@cs.wisc.edu; Christoph Hellwig
> > (hch@infradead.org); linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org;
> > gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; jasowang@redhat.com; linux-
> > kernel@vger.kernel.org; ohering@suse.com; apw@canonical.com;
> > devel@linuxdriverproject.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [SCSI] Fix a bug in deriving the FLUSH_TIMEOUT
> > from the basic I/O timeout
> > 
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:53:33PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > I still see this problem. There was talk of fixing it elsewhere.
> > 
> > Well, what we have right not is entirely broken, given that the block layer
> > doesn't initialize ->timeout on TYPE_FS requeuests.
> > 
> > We either need to revert that initial commit or apply something like the
> > attached patch as a quick fix.
> I had sent this exact patch sometime back:
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg75385.html

Actually, no you didn't.  The difference is in the derivation of the
timeout.  Christoph's patch is absolute in terms of SD_TIMEOUT; yours is
relative to the queue timeout setting ... I thought there was a reason
for preferring the relative version.

James


  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-18 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-04 16:33 K. Y. Srinivasan
2014-06-04 17:02 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-04 17:15   ` KY Srinivasan
2014-06-06  1:32     ` Mike Christie
2014-06-06  2:53       ` KY Srinivasan
2014-06-06 17:18         ` Mike Christie
2014-06-06 17:52           ` James Bottomley
2014-06-06 18:22             ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-20 21:36               ` KY Srinivasan
2014-07-17 23:53                 ` KY Srinivasan
2014-07-18  0:51                   ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2014-07-18 15:11                     ` Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org)
2014-07-18 15:39                     ` James Bottomley
2014-07-18 17:17                       ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2014-07-18 17:41                         ` James Bottomley
2014-07-18 18:16                           ` Douglas Gilbert
2014-07-18 15:10                   ` Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org)
2014-07-18 16:44                     ` KY Srinivasan
2014-07-18 16:57                       ` James Bottomley [this message]
2014-07-18 17:01                         ` hch
2014-07-18 17:05                         ` KY Srinivasan
2014-07-18 17:12                           ` hch
2014-07-18 17:15                             ` hch
2014-07-18 17:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 17:03   ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1405702633.30262.3.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com \
    --to=jbottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=ohering@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®