* [PATCH] workqueue: give a protection when get_work_pwq return NULL.
@ 2014-09-19 4:12 jun.zhang
2014-09-19 13:24 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: jun.zhang @ 2014-09-19 4:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tj; +Cc: linux-kernel, zhang jun
From: zhang jun <jun.zhang@intel.com>
if pwq==NULL, system could panic. next is the panic log.
[12973.660792] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000004
[12973.668787] IP: [<c125b8ab>] process_one_work+0x2b/0x3e0
[12973.674735] *pdpt = 00000000304b0001 *pde = 0000000000000000
[12973.681167] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[12973.685557] Modules linked in: atomisp_css2400b0_v21 lm3554 ov2722 imx1x5 libmsrlisthelper atmel_mxt_ts vxd392 videobuf_vmalloc videobuf_core lm_dump(O) bcm_bt_lpm hdmi_audio bcm4334x(O)
[12973.704154] CPU: 0 PID: 26284 Comm: kworker/0:0 Tainted: G W O 3.10.20-263108-g04ac390 #1
[12973.714070] Hardware name: Intel Corp. VALLEYVIEW C0 PLATFORM/BYT-T FFD8, BIOS BLAKFF81.86C.0099.R41.1406121403 FFD8_IA32_R_2014_24_4_01 06/12/2014
[12973.728846] task: c6e4f620 ti: eda0a000 task.ti: eda0a000
[12973.734878] EIP: 0060:[<c125b8ab>] EFLAGS: 00010046 CPU: 0
[12973.741010] EIP is at process_one_work+0x2b/0x3e0
[12973.746263] EAX: f364f4c0 EBX: c5267dc8 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000
[12973.753264] ESI: f06fc840 EDI: f06fc840 EBP: eda0bf28 ESP: eda0bef8
[12973.760265] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
[12973.766294] CR0: 8005003b CR2: 00000078 CR3: 30798000 CR4: 001007f0
[12973.773295] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
[12973.780296] DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400
[12973.784578] Stack:
[12973.786820] f364f4c0 f06fc840 eda0bf1c c1a9d81d c1a9d715 00000000 00000000 00000000
[12973.793547] f364f4c0[12973.793548] f06fc858[12973.793549] f364f4c0[12973.793550] f06fc840[12973.793551] eda0bf54[12973.793552] c125c036[12973.793553] c1a9a337[12973.793554] c6e4f620[12973.793555]
[12973.793555] f364f4c0[12973.793556] c6e4f620[12973.793557] c6e4f620[12973.793558] f364f4e0[12973.793559] e73cde84[12973.793560] f06fc840[12973.793561] c125bf40[12973.793562] eda0bfac[12973.793563]
[12973.793564] Call Trace:
[12973.793567] [12973.793574] [<c1a9d81d>] ? add_preempt_count+0x7d/0xf0
[12973.793575] [12973.793577] [<c1a9d715>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x55/0xe0
[12973.793579] [12973.793583] [<c125c036>] worker_thread+0xf6/0x310
[12973.793584] [12973.793586] [<c1a9a337>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x47/0x50
[12973.793588] [12973.793590] [<c125bf40>] ? rescuer_thread+0x2b0/0x2b0
[12973.793591] [12973.793594] [<c1261bf4>] kthread+0x94/0xa0
[12973.793596] [12973.793598] [<c1a9d715>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x55/0xe0
[12973.793600] [12973.793602] [<c1aa0b77>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28
[12973.793603] [12973.793606] [<c1261b60>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0xc0/0xc0
Signed-off-by: zhang jun <jun.zhang@intel.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 5dbe22a..e3baa55 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1947,9 +1947,19 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock)
{
struct pool_workqueue *pwq = get_work_pwq(work);
struct worker_pool *pool = worker->pool;
- bool cpu_intensive = pwq->wq->flags & WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE;
int work_color;
struct worker *collision;
+
+ if (pwq == NULL) {
+ pr_err("BUG: pwq is NULL. data: 0x%08lx @ work: 0x%p\n",
+ atomic_long_read(&work->data), work);
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ move_linked_works(work, &worker->scheduled, NULL);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ bool cpu_intensive = pwq->wq->flags & WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
/*
* It is permissible to free the struct work_struct from
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] workqueue: give a protection when get_work_pwq return NULL.
2014-09-19 4:12 [PATCH] workqueue: give a protection when get_work_pwq return NULL jun.zhang
@ 2014-09-19 13:24 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2014-09-19 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jun.zhang; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:12:04PM +0800, jun.zhang@intel.com wrote:
> From: zhang jun <jun.zhang@intel.com>
>
> if pwq==NULL, system could panic. next is the panic log.
> [12973.660792] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000004
> [12973.668787] IP: [<c125b8ab>] process_one_work+0x2b/0x3e0
Well, it shouldn't be NULL for a pending work_struct.
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -1947,9 +1947,19 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock)
> {
> struct pool_workqueue *pwq = get_work_pwq(work);
> struct worker_pool *pool = worker->pool;
> - bool cpu_intensive = pwq->wq->flags & WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE;
> int work_color;
> struct worker *collision;
> +
> + if (pwq == NULL) {
> + pr_err("BUG: pwq is NULL. data: 0x%08lx @ work: 0x%p\n",
> + atomic_long_read(&work->data), work);
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + move_linked_works(work, &worker->scheduled, NULL);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + bool cpu_intensive = pwq->wq->flags & WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE;
Jesus, please don't do this. The problem must be root-caused before
adding random workaround code. This is most likely the queued
work_struct being corrupted somehow (e.g. being prematurely freed or
whatnot). It makes zero sense to add random check in workqueue code
for that.
Nacked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-19 13:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-19 4:12 [PATCH] workqueue: give a protection when get_work_pwq return NULL jun.zhang
2014-09-19 13:24 ` Tejun Heo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®