From: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Tuan Bui <tuan.d.bui@hp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
paulus@samba.org, acme@kernel.org, artagnon@gmail.com,
jolsa@redhat.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Perf Bench: Locking Microbenchmark
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 21:52:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1412311972.27162.3.camel@linux-t7sj.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141001052832.GA32248@gmail.com>
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 07:28 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> If you compare an strace of AIM7 steady state and 'perf bench
> lock' steady state, is it comparable, i.e. do the syscalls and
> other behavioral patterns match up?
With more than 1000 users I'm seeing:
- 33.74% locking-creat [kernel.kallsyms] [k] mspin_lock ◆
+ mspin_lock ▒
+ __mutex_lock_slowpath ▒
+ mutex_lock ▒
- 7.97% locking-creat [kernel.kallsyms] [k] mutex_spin_on_owner ▒
+ mutex_spin_on_owner ▒
+ __mutex_lock_slowpath ▒
+ mutex_lock
Lower users count just shows the syscall entries.
Of course, the aim7 setup was running on a ramdisk, thus avoiding any IO
overhead in the traces.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-03 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-30 23:49 Tuan Bui
2014-10-01 5:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-10-01 17:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-10-03 4:57 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-10-08 22:14 ` Tuan Bui
2014-10-08 22:11 ` Tuan Bui
2014-10-03 4:52 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2014-10-08 22:13 ` Tuan Bui
2014-10-09 7:21 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1412311972.27162.3.camel@linux-t7sj.site \
--to=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tuan.d.bui@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome