mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Tuan Bui <tuan.d.bui@hp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
	paulus@samba.org, artagnon@gmail.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
	dvhart@linux.intel.com, Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
	Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Perf Bench: Locking Microbenchmark
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 21:57:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1412312253.27162.5.camel@linux-t7sj.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141001171226.GF2799@kernel.org>

On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 14:12 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 07:28:32AM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > If you compare an strace of AIM7 steady state and 'perf bench 
> > lock' steady state, is it comparable, i.e. do the syscalls and 
> 
> Isn't "lock" too generic? Isn't this stressing some specific lock and if
> so shouldn't that be made abundantly clear in the 'perf bench' test name
> and in the docs?

yeah, and 'perf bench locking creat' just doesn't sound right.


  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-03  4:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-30 23:49 Tuan Bui
2014-10-01  5:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-10-01 17:12   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-10-03  4:57     ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2014-10-08 22:14       ` Tuan Bui
2014-10-08 22:11     ` Tuan Bui
2014-10-03  4:52   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-10-08 22:13   ` Tuan Bui
2014-10-09  7:21     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1412312253.27162.5.camel@linux-t7sj.site \
    --to=dbueso@suse.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
    --cc=aswin@hp.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=tuan.d.bui@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome