* [PATCH] ring-buffer: use atomic_[set|clear]_mask in place of a cmpxchg loop
@ 2014-10-15 13:41 Patrick Palka
2014-10-15 19:08 ` Patrick Palka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Palka @ 2014-10-15 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Patrick Palka, Steven Rostedt, Ingo Molnar
Instead of open-coding the equivalent cmpxchg loop we can just use
atomic_set_mask and atomic_clear_mask to atomically OR or AND
the value in &buffer->record_disabled.
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
---
NB: I have only tested this patch on x86_64 by booting with
CONFIG_RING_BUFFER_STARTUP_TEST=y.
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 16 ++--------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 2d75c94..e15ce2a 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -3050,13 +3050,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_record_enable);
*/
void ring_buffer_record_off(struct ring_buffer *buffer)
{
- unsigned int rd;
- unsigned int new_rd;
-
- do {
- rd = atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled);
- new_rd = rd | RB_BUFFER_OFF;
- } while (atomic_cmpxchg(&buffer->record_disabled, rd, new_rd) != rd);
+ atomic_set_mask(RB_BUFFER_OFF, &buffer->record_disabled);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_record_off);
@@ -3073,13 +3067,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_record_off);
*/
void ring_buffer_record_on(struct ring_buffer *buffer)
{
- unsigned int rd;
- unsigned int new_rd;
-
- do {
- rd = atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled);
- new_rd = rd & ~RB_BUFFER_OFF;
- } while (atomic_cmpxchg(&buffer->record_disabled, rd, new_rd) != rd);
+ atomic_clear_mask(RB_BUFFER_OFF, &buffer->record_disabled);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_record_on);
--
2.1.2.443.g670a3c1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: use atomic_[set|clear]_mask in place of a cmpxchg loop
2014-10-15 13:41 [PATCH] ring-buffer: use atomic_[set|clear]_mask in place of a cmpxchg loop Patrick Palka
@ 2014-10-15 19:08 ` Patrick Palka
2014-10-15 19:33 ` Patrick Palka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Palka @ 2014-10-15 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Patrick Palka, Steven Rostedt, Ingo Molnar
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx> wrote:
> Instead of open-coding the equivalent cmpxchg loop we can just use
> atomic_set_mask and atomic_clear_mask to atomically OR or AND
> the value in &buffer->record_disabled.
>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
> ---
>
> NB: I have only tested this patch on x86_64 by booting with
> CONFIG_RING_BUFFER_STARTUP_TEST=y.
>
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 16 ++--------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index 2d75c94..e15ce2a 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -3050,13 +3050,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_record_enable);
> */
> void ring_buffer_record_off(struct ring_buffer *buffer)
> {
> - unsigned int rd;
> - unsigned int new_rd;
> -
> - do {
> - rd = atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled);
> - new_rd = rd | RB_BUFFER_OFF;
> - } while (atomic_cmpxchg(&buffer->record_disabled, rd, new_rd) != rd);
> + atomic_set_mask(RB_BUFFER_OFF, &buffer->record_disabled);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_record_off);
>
> @@ -3073,13 +3067,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_record_off);
> */
> void ring_buffer_record_on(struct ring_buffer *buffer)
> {
> - unsigned int rd;
> - unsigned int new_rd;
> -
> - do {
> - rd = atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled);
> - new_rd = rd & ~RB_BUFFER_OFF;
> - } while (atomic_cmpxchg(&buffer->record_disabled, rd, new_rd) != rd);
> + atomic_clear_mask(RB_BUFFER_OFF, &buffer->record_disabled);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_record_on);
>
> --
> 2.1.2.443.g670a3c1
>
It just occurred to me that atomic_clear_mask and atomic_set_mask
expect to take an int *, not an atomic_t *, so this patch is bogus...
Sorry for the noise.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: use atomic_[set|clear]_mask in place of a cmpxchg loop
2014-10-15 19:08 ` Patrick Palka
@ 2014-10-15 19:33 ` Patrick Palka
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Palka @ 2014-10-15 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Patrick Palka, Steven Rostedt, Ingo Molnar
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx> wrote:
>> Instead of open-coding the equivalent cmpxchg loop we can just use
>> atomic_set_mask and atomic_clear_mask to atomically OR or AND
>> the value in &buffer->record_disabled.
>>
>> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
>> ---
>>
>> NB: I have only tested this patch on x86_64 by booting with
>> CONFIG_RING_BUFFER_STARTUP_TEST=y.
>>
>> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 16 ++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
>> index 2d75c94..e15ce2a 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
>> @@ -3050,13 +3050,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_record_enable);
>> */
>> void ring_buffer_record_off(struct ring_buffer *buffer)
>> {
>> - unsigned int rd;
>> - unsigned int new_rd;
>> -
>> - do {
>> - rd = atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled);
>> - new_rd = rd | RB_BUFFER_OFF;
>> - } while (atomic_cmpxchg(&buffer->record_disabled, rd, new_rd) != rd);
>> + atomic_set_mask(RB_BUFFER_OFF, &buffer->record_disabled);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_record_off);
>>
>> @@ -3073,13 +3067,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_record_off);
>> */
>> void ring_buffer_record_on(struct ring_buffer *buffer)
>> {
>> - unsigned int rd;
>> - unsigned int new_rd;
>> -
>> - do {
>> - rd = atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled);
>> - new_rd = rd & ~RB_BUFFER_OFF;
>> - } while (atomic_cmpxchg(&buffer->record_disabled, rd, new_rd) != rd);
>> + atomic_clear_mask(RB_BUFFER_OFF, &buffer->record_disabled);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_record_on);
>>
>> --
>> 2.1.2.443.g670a3c1
>>
>
> It just occurred to me that atomic_clear_mask and atomic_set_mask
> expect to take an int *, not an atomic_t *, so this patch is bogus...
> Sorry for the noise.
Uh, actually, the generic implementations of these functions (defined
in include/asm-generic/atomic.h) _do_ take an atomic_t *. It's the
specialized x86 definitions of these functions (defined in
arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h) that take (expect) an int *. So this
patch is not bogus; the x86 specializations for atomic_clear_mask and
atomic_set_mask are. I will try to fix this in a separate patch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-15 19:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-10-15 13:41 [PATCH] ring-buffer: use atomic_[set|clear]_mask in place of a cmpxchg loop Patrick Palka
2014-10-15 19:08 ` Patrick Palka
2014-10-15 19:33 ` Patrick Palka
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®