From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
bobby.prani@gmail.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/10] rcu: Remove "cpu" argument to rcu_pending()
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:53:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1414533217-24910-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414533217-24910-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Because rcu_pending()'s argument is guaranteed to always be the current
CPU, drop the argument and replace per_cpu_ptr() with this_cpu_ptr().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 3107811bba69..0670ba3a65d3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static void force_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp,
unsigned long *maxj),
bool *isidle, unsigned long *maxj);
static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp);
-static int rcu_pending(int cpu);
+static int rcu_pending(void);
/*
* Return the number of RCU-sched batches processed thus far for debug & stats.
@@ -2421,7 +2421,7 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int user)
rcu_bh_qs();
}
rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(smp_processor_id());
- if (rcu_pending(smp_processor_id()))
+ if (rcu_pending())
invoke_rcu_core();
if (user)
rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(current);
@@ -3144,12 +3144,12 @@ static int __rcu_pending(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
* by the current CPU, returning 1 if so. This function is part of the
* RCU implementation; it is -not- an exported member of the RCU API.
*/
-static int rcu_pending(int cpu)
+static int rcu_pending(void)
{
struct rcu_state *rsp;
for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
- if (__rcu_pending(rsp, per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu)))
+ if (__rcu_pending(rsp, this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda)))
return 1;
return 0;
}
--
1.8.1.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-28 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-28 21:51 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/9] Per-CPU-variable updates Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/10] rcu: Remove rcu_dynticks * parameters when they are always this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks) Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/10] rcu: Use DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED for rcu_data Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/10] rcu: Remove "cpu" argument to rcu_check_callbacks() Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-10-28 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/10] rcu: Remove "cpu" argument to rcu_preempt_check_callbacks() Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/10] rcu: Remove "cpu" argument to rcu_note_context_switch() Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/10] rcu: Remove "cpu" argument to rcu_needs_cpu() Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/10] rcu: Remove "cpu" argument to rcu_prepare_for_idle() Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/10] rcu: Remove "cpu" argument to rcu_cleanup_after_idle() Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/10] cpu: Avoid puts_pending overflow Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-29 17:56 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-10-29 17:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/9] Per-CPU-variable updates Pranith Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1414533217-24910-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®