mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
	bobby.prani@gmail.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/10] rcu: Remove "cpu" argument to rcu_preempt_check_callbacks()
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:53:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1414533217-24910-5-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414533217-24910-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Because rcu_preempt_check_callbacks()'s argument is guaranteed to
always be the current CPU, drop the argument and replace per_cpu()
with __this_cpu_read().

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c        | 2 +-
 kernel/rcu/tree.h        | 2 +-
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 8 ++++----
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 0670ba3a65d3..1af5e2cdcbeb 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2420,7 +2420,7 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int user)
 
 		rcu_bh_qs();
 	}
-	rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(smp_processor_id());
+	rcu_preempt_check_callbacks();
 	if (rcu_pending())
 		invoke_rcu_core();
 	if (user)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 8e90562010ec..94a26e330c1b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static int rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(struct rcu_state *rsp,
 				     struct rcu_node *rnp,
 				     struct rcu_data *rdp);
 #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
-static void rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(int cpu);
+static void rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(void);
 void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu));
 #if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) || defined(CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU)
 static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 09547143628a..7158814b7b4a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ static int rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(struct rcu_state *rsp,
  *
  * Caller must disable hard irqs.
  */
-static void rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(int cpu)
+static void rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(void)
 {
 	struct task_struct *t = current;
 
@@ -630,8 +630,8 @@ static void rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(int cpu)
 		return;
 	}
 	if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting > 0 &&
-	    per_cpu(rcu_preempt_data, cpu).qs_pending &&
-	    !per_cpu(rcu_preempt_data, cpu).passed_quiesce)
+	    __this_cpu_read(rcu_preempt_data.qs_pending) &&
+	    !__this_cpu_read(rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce))
 		t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs = true;
 }
 
@@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ static int rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(struct rcu_state *rsp,
  * Because preemptible RCU does not exist, it never has any callbacks
  * to check.
  */
-static void rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(int cpu)
+static void rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(void)
 {
 }
 
-- 
1.8.1.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-28 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-28 21:51 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/9] Per-CPU-variable updates Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/10] rcu: Remove rcu_dynticks * parameters when they are always this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks) Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/10] rcu: Use DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED for rcu_data Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/10] rcu: Remove "cpu" argument to rcu_check_callbacks() Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/10] rcu: Remove "cpu" argument to rcu_pending() Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-10-28 21:53   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/10] rcu: Remove "cpu" argument to rcu_note_context_switch() Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/10] rcu: Remove "cpu" argument to rcu_needs_cpu() Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/10] rcu: Remove "cpu" argument to rcu_prepare_for_idle() Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/10] rcu: Remove "cpu" argument to rcu_cleanup_after_idle() Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-28 21:53   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/10] cpu: Avoid puts_pending overflow Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-29 17:56     ` Pranith Kumar
2014-10-29 17:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/9] Per-CPU-variable updates Pranith Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1414533217-24910-5-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®