* [PATCH] 6fire: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8
@ 2014-11-14 5:13 Wang, Yalin
2014-11-14 5:45 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wang, Yalin @ 2014-11-14 5:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'perex@perex.cz', 'tiwai@suse.de',
'joe@perches.com', 'alsa-devel@alsa-project.org',
'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'
Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array.
This allows some architectures with hardware instructions for bit
reversals to eliminate the array.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Yalin Wang <yalin.wang@sonymobile.com>
---
sound/usb/6fire/firmware.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/usb/6fire/firmware.c b/sound/usb/6fire/firmware.c
index 3b02e54..2e39c3f 100644
--- a/sound/usb/6fire/firmware.c
+++ b/sound/usb/6fire/firmware.c
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static int usb6fire_fw_fpga_upload(
while (c != end) {
for (i = 0; c != end && i < FPGA_BUFSIZE; i++, c++)
- buffer[i] = byte_rev_table[(u8) *c];
+ buffer[i] = bitrev8((u8) *c);
ret = usb6fire_fw_fpga_write(device, buffer, i);
if (ret < 0) {
--
2.1.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] 6fire: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8
2014-11-14 5:13 [PATCH] 6fire: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8 Wang, Yalin
@ 2014-11-14 5:45 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2014-11-14 5:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wang, Yalin
Cc: 'perex@perex.cz', 'tiwai@suse.de',
'alsa-devel@alsa-project.org',
'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'
On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 13:13 +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array.
>
> This allows some architectures with hardware instructions for bit
> reversals to eliminate the array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yalin Wang <yalin.wang@sonymobile.com>
> ---
[]
> diff --git a/sound/usb/6fire/firmware.c b/sound/usb/6fire/firmware.c
[]
> @@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static int usb6fire_fw_fpga_upload(
>
> while (c != end) {
> for (i = 0; c != end && i < FPGA_BUFSIZE; i++, c++)
> - buffer[i] = byte_rev_table[(u8) *c];
> + buffer[i] = bitrev8((u8) *c);
This is not what I submitted.
What I posted did not have a space after (u8)
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/28/1056
If you are going to resubmit or add your own sign-off,
please try to maintain the proper patch that is
submitted and please also use a "From:" line before
the patch itself.
Thanks, Joe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] 6fire: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8
2014-10-29 3:06 ` Joe Perches
@ 2014-10-29 3:10 ` Wang, Yalin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wang, Yalin @ 2014-10-29 3:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Joe Perches'
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai, Russell King, linux-mm,
Will Deacon, Akinobu Mita, linux-arm-kernel, alsa-devel, LKML
> From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@perches.com]
> > I think the most safe way is change byte_rev_table[] to be satic, So
> > that no driver can access it directly, The build error can remind the
> > developer if they use byte_rev_table[] Directly .
>
> You can do that with your later patch, but the existing uses _must_ be
> converted first so you don't break the build.
>
>
Yeah, I agree with you,
I will add this into my later patch.
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] 6fire: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8
2014-10-29 2:42 ` Wang, Yalin
@ 2014-10-29 3:06 ` Joe Perches
2014-10-29 3:10 ` Wang, Yalin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2014-10-29 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wang, Yalin
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai, Russell King, linux-mm,
Will Deacon, Akinobu Mita, linux-arm-kernel, alsa-devel, LKML
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 10:42 +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array.
> > This allows some architectures with hardware instructions for bit reversals
> > to eliminate the array.
[]
> > On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 23:46 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 14:37 +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > > > this change add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE config option, so that
> > > > we can use arm/arm64 rbit instruction to do bitrev operation by
> > > > hardware.
[]
> I think the most safe way is change byte_rev_table[] to be satic,
> So that no driver can access it directly,
> The build error can remind the developer if they use byte_rev_table[]
> Directly .
You can do that with your later patch, but the
existing uses _must_ be converted first so you
don't break the build.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] 6fire: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8
2014-10-28 21:22 ` [PATCH] 6fire: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8 Joe Perches
@ 2014-10-29 2:42 ` Wang, Yalin
2014-10-29 3:06 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wang, Yalin @ 2014-10-29 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Joe Perches', Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai
Cc: Russell King, linux-mm, Will Deacon, Akinobu Mita,
linux-arm-kernel, alsa-devel, LKML, linux-mm, Will Deacon,
Akinobu Mita, linux-arm-kernel, alsa-devel, LKML
> Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array.
>
> This allows some architectures with hardware instructions for bit reversals
> to eliminate the array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> ---
> On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 23:46 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 14:37 +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > > this change add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE config option, so that
> > > we can use arm/arm64 rbit instruction to do bitrev operation by
> > > hardware.
> []
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/bitrev.h b/include/linux/bitrev.h index
> > > 7ffe03f..ef5b2bb 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/bitrev.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/bitrev.h
> > > @@ -3,6 +3,14 @@
> > >
> > > #include <linux/types.h>
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE
> > > +#include <asm/bitrev.h>
> > > +
> > > +#define bitrev32 __arch_bitrev32
> > > +#define bitrev16 __arch_bitrev16
> > > +#define bitrev8 __arch_bitrev8
> > > +
> > > +#else
> > > extern u8 const byte_rev_table[256];
>
> sound/usb/6fire/firmware.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/usb/6fire/firmware.c b/sound/usb/6fire/firmware.c index
> 3b02e54..62c25e7 100644
> --- a/sound/usb/6fire/firmware.c
> +++ b/sound/usb/6fire/firmware.c
> @@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static int usb6fire_fw_fpga_upload(
>
> while (c != end) {
> for (i = 0; c != end && i < FPGA_BUFSIZE; i++, c++)
> - buffer[i] = byte_rev_table[(u8) *c];
> + buffer[i] = bitrev8((u8)*c);
>
> ret = usb6fire_fw_fpga_write(device, buffer, i);
> if (ret < 0) {
>
I think the most safe way is change byte_rev_table[] to be satic,
So that no driver can access it directly,
The build error can remind the developer if they use byte_rev_table[]
Directly .
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] 6fire: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8
2014-10-27 6:46 ` Joe Perches
@ 2014-10-28 21:22 ` Joe Perches
2014-10-29 2:42 ` Wang, Yalin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2014-10-28 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai
Cc: Wang, Yalin, Russell King, linux-mm, Will Deacon, Akinobu Mita,
linux-arm-kernel, alsa-devel, LKML, linux-mm, Will Deacon,
Akinobu Mita, linux-arm-kernel, alsa-devel, LKML
Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array.
This allows some architectures with hardware instructions
for bit reversals to eliminate the array.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
---
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 23:46 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 14:37 +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > this change add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE config option,
> > so that we can use arm/arm64 rbit instruction to do bitrev operation
> > by hardware.
[]
> > diff --git a/include/linux/bitrev.h b/include/linux/bitrev.h
> > index 7ffe03f..ef5b2bb 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/bitrev.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/bitrev.h
> > @@ -3,6 +3,14 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE
> > +#include <asm/bitrev.h>
> > +
> > +#define bitrev32 __arch_bitrev32
> > +#define bitrev16 __arch_bitrev16
> > +#define bitrev8 __arch_bitrev8
> > +
> > +#else
> > extern u8 const byte_rev_table[256];
sound/usb/6fire/firmware.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/usb/6fire/firmware.c b/sound/usb/6fire/firmware.c
index 3b02e54..62c25e7 100644
--- a/sound/usb/6fire/firmware.c
+++ b/sound/usb/6fire/firmware.c
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static int usb6fire_fw_fpga_upload(
while (c != end) {
for (i = 0; c != end && i < FPGA_BUFSIZE; i++, c++)
- buffer[i] = byte_rev_table[(u8) *c];
+ buffer[i] = bitrev8((u8)*c);
ret = usb6fire_fw_fpga_write(device, buffer, i);
if (ret < 0) {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-14 5:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-11-14 5:13 [PATCH] 6fire: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8 Wang, Yalin
2014-11-14 5:45 ` Joe Perches
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-24 5:10 [PATCH RFC] arm/arm64:add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE to support rbit Wang, Yalin
2014-10-27 6:37 ` [RFC V2] arm/arm64:add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE to support rbit instruction Wang, Yalin
2014-10-27 6:46 ` Joe Perches
2014-10-28 21:22 ` [PATCH] 6fire: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8 Joe Perches
2014-10-29 2:42 ` Wang, Yalin
2014-10-29 3:06 ` Joe Perches
2014-10-29 3:10 ` Wang, Yalin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®