Re: [PATCH 2/2] Staging: lustre: lproc_osc.c: used seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()

[Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>]

On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 23:29 +0530, Hariharan Rangasamy wrote:
> Replaced seq_printf() with seq_puts()
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/lproc_osc.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/lproc_osc.c
[]
> @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static int osc_checksum_type_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>  		else
>  			seq_printf(m, "%s ", cksum_name[i]);
>  	}
> -	seq_printf(m, "\n");
> +	seq_puts(m, "\n");

This could be seq_putc

>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ static int osc_rpc_stats_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>  	seq_printf(seq, "pending read pages:   %d\n",
>  		   atomic_read(&cli->cl_pending_r_pages));
>  
> -	seq_printf(seq, "\n\t\t\tread\t\t\twrite\n");
> +	seq_puts(seq, "\n\t\t\tread\t\t\twrite\n");
>  	seq_printf(seq, "pages per rpc	 rpcs   %% cum %% |");
>  	seq_printf(seq, "       rpcs   %% cum %%\n");

These and others could be seq_puts too, just use % instead of %%