mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] locking/mcs: Better differentiate between mcs variants
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:55:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1421250926.2258.14.camel@stgolabs.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150114141356.GA12084@gmail.com>

Hi Ingo,

> x86 defconfig produces:
> 
>   kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h:81:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ASSIGN_ONCE’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 
> Also, this patch should really be split into three separate (and 
> tested) patches.

These patches were tested, the failure is because the ASSIGN_ONCE
function was renamed only yesterday (see
43239cbe79fc369f5d2160bd7f69e28b5c50a58c).

Thanks,
Davidlohr


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-14 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-28  9:11 [PATCH 0/8] locking: Various updates Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-28  9:11 ` [PATCH 1/8] Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: Fix smp typo Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-31  2:02   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-28  9:11 ` [PATCH 2/8] locking/mutex: Get rid of use_ww_cxt param in common paths Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-28 16:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-12-28 18:12     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-28  9:11 ` [PATCH 3/8] locking/mutex: Checking the stamp is ww only Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-28  9:11 ` [PATCH 4/8] locking/mutex: Delete useless comment Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-28  9:11 ` [PATCH 5/8] locking/mutex: Introduce ww_mutex_set_context_slowpath Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-28  9:11 ` [PATCH 6/8] locking/mcs: Better differentiate between mcs variants Davidlohr Bueso
2015-01-14 14:13   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-01-14 15:55     ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2015-01-14 14:16   ` Ingo Molnar
2014-12-28  9:11 ` [PATCH 7/8] locking: Use [READ,ASSIGN]_ONCE() for non-scalar types Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-28 16:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-12-28  9:11 ` [PATCH 8/8] locking/osq: No need for load/acquire when acquire-polling Davidlohr Bueso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1421250926.2258.14.camel@stgolabs.net \
    --to=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®