mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] x86/compressed: remove unnecessary check
@ 2015-02-20 17:55 Alexander Kuleshov
  2015-02-20 18:38 ` Kees Cook
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kuleshov @ 2015-02-20 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: H. Peter Anvin, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Kees Cook
  Cc: linux-kernel, Alexander Kuleshov

region.start is entry->addr, but we already did check for case when
entry->addr + entry->size < minimum, so no need to check that
region.start is less than minimum.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c
index bb13763..13424a9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c
@@ -249,11 +249,7 @@ static void process_e820_entry(struct e820entry *entry,
 
 	region.start = entry->addr;
 	region.size = entry->size;
-
-	/* Potentially raise address to minimum location. */
-	if (region.start < minimum)
-		region.start = minimum;
-
+ 
 	/* Potentially raise address to meet alignment requirements. */
 	region.start = ALIGN(region.start, CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN);
 
-- 
2.3.0.80.g18d0fec


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86/compressed: remove unnecessary check
  2015-02-20 17:55 [PATCH] x86/compressed: remove unnecessary check Alexander Kuleshov
@ 2015-02-20 18:38 ` Kees Cook
  2015-02-20 18:47   ` Alexander Kuleshov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2015-02-20 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexander Kuleshov; +Cc: H. Peter Anvin, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, LKML

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Alexander Kuleshov
<kuleshovmail@gmail.com> wrote:
> region.start is entry->addr, but we already did check for case when
> entry->addr + entry->size < minimum, so no need to check that
> region.start is less than minimum.

Nope, that's not correct. Those are separate checks. For example, a
region 20..130 would be seen as:

start = 20
size = 110

With minimum = 50, the first check eliminates anything with size <= 30
(since the region would be entirely (20...50) below the minimum).

The second check (the one you're suggesting to remove) raises the
bottom of the region up to the minimum:

start = 50

And later on ("Reduce size by any delta from the original address."),
the size is also adjusted to notice any changes:

size = 80

Now the region is 50...130: the bottom is cut off to adapt to the
minimum location.

Is there some situation you found where this logic isn't working?

-Kees

>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c | 6 +-----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c
> index bb13763..13424a9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c
> @@ -249,11 +249,7 @@ static void process_e820_entry(struct e820entry *entry,
>
>         region.start = entry->addr;
>         region.size = entry->size;
> -
> -       /* Potentially raise address to minimum location. */
> -       if (region.start < minimum)
> -               region.start = minimum;
> -
> +
>         /* Potentially raise address to meet alignment requirements. */
>         region.start = ALIGN(region.start, CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN);
>
> --
> 2.3.0.80.g18d0fec
>



-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86/compressed: remove unnecessary check
  2015-02-20 18:38 ` Kees Cook
@ 2015-02-20 18:47   ` Alexander Kuleshov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kuleshov @ 2015-02-20 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kees Cook; +Cc: H. Peter Anvin, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, LKML

Hello Kees,

yes you're fully right.

sorry for noise.

2015-02-21 0:38 GMT+06:00 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Alexander Kuleshov
> <kuleshovmail@gmail.com> wrote:
>> region.start is entry->addr, but we already did check for case when
>> entry->addr + entry->size < minimum, so no need to check that
>> region.start is less than minimum.
>
> Nope, that's not correct. Those are separate checks. For example, a
> region 20..130 would be seen as:
>
> start = 20
> size = 110
>
> With minimum = 50, the first check eliminates anything with size <= 30
> (since the region would be entirely (20...50) below the minimum).
>
> The second check (the one you're suggesting to remove) raises the
> bottom of the region up to the minimum:
>
> start = 50
>
> And later on ("Reduce size by any delta from the original address."),
> the size is also adjusted to notice any changes:
>
> size = 80
>
> Now the region is 50...130: the bottom is cut off to adapt to the
> minimum location.
>
> Is there some situation you found where this logic isn't working?
>
> -Kees
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c | 6 +-----
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c
>> index bb13763..13424a9 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c
>> @@ -249,11 +249,7 @@ static void process_e820_entry(struct e820entry *entry,
>>
>>         region.start = entry->addr;
>>         region.size = entry->size;
>> -
>> -       /* Potentially raise address to minimum location. */
>> -       if (region.start < minimum)
>> -               region.start = minimum;
>> -
>> +
>>         /* Potentially raise address to meet alignment requirements. */
>>         region.start = ALIGN(region.start, CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN);
>>
>> --
>> 2.3.0.80.g18d0fec
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Chrome OS Security



-- 
_________________________
0xAX

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-20 18:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-20 17:55 [PATCH] x86/compressed: remove unnecessary check Alexander Kuleshov
2015-02-20 18:38 ` Kees Cook
2015-02-20 18:47   ` Alexander Kuleshov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®