From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: mmarek@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
davej@codemonkey.org.uk, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Don't pass -rR to selftest makefiles
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:49:46 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1426031386.20917.4.camel@ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54FF809F.7020205@osg.samsung.com>
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 17:39 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 03/10/2015 05:36 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 16:49 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> >> On 03/09/2015 08:28 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> >>> On 03/04/2015 03:19 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >>>> The makefiles under tools/testing/selftests are not real kbuild
> >>>> makefiles, they are regular stand alone makefiles. As such they *do*
> >>>> want all the standard implicit rules and variables defined.
> >>>>
> >>>> So before calling those makefiles, filter -rR out of MAKEFLAGS.
> >>>>
> >>>> Without this not all the selftests are built correctly when called via
> >>>> the top-level Makefile.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Michal,
> >>>
> >>> Could you please take this patch in your tree.
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
> >>>
> >>
> >> I am changing this to a Nack. This is not fully cooked.
> >> I am seeing new failures on some tests.
> >>
> >> gcc: error: elf_x86_64: No such file or directory
> >> gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-m’
> >
> > I can't reproduce that here. In what way do you think it's related to this
> > patch?
>
> I have just your patch on tops of linux 4.0-rc3 and ran
> make kselftest and that's what I see.
>
> If you can fix this problem I can take your patch, otherwise,
> I have to go with individual Makefiles fixes.
OK I see it now, only happens on x86.
It looks like it's coming in via kbuild. Though I can only see it being set in
arch/x86/Makefile.um, and I don't know why that is being sourced. But it must
be.
So this is another symptom of running via the top-level Makefile rather than
directly.
I'll try and find a fix.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-10 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-04 10:19 Michael Ellerman
2015-03-09 14:28 ` Shuah Khan
2015-03-09 22:49 ` Shuah Khan
2015-03-10 23:36 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-03-10 23:39 ` Shuah Khan
2015-03-10 23:49 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2015-03-11 0:35 ` Shuah Khan
2015-03-11 0:46 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1426031386.20917.4.camel@ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome