From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: dmi_scan: Prevent dmi_num integer overflow
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:21:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1427383313.4261.7.camel@chaos.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150326144717.GD6525@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Le Thursday 26 March 2015 à 14:47 +0000, Matt Fleming a écrit :
> On Thu, 26 Mar, at 02:15:05PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> >
> > I don't actually have a tree, so feel free to pick it.
>
> OK will do, but this is a regression fix for a potential bug introduced
> in commit 6d9ff4733172 ("firmware: dmi_scan: Fix dmi_len type"), right?
Not really. I'd rather say it complements commit 6d9ff4733172. The
actual bugs were introduced in commit fc43026278b2. But you can't really
call it a regression as SMBIOS 3.0 entry points were not supported at
all before that commit.
Still a reference to commit fc43026278b2 would certainly be appropriate,
as anyone backporting that commit will also want to pick the two
aforementioned fix-ups (plus ce204e9a4bd8 for that matter.)
Thanks,
Jean
> If so, it would be useful for this patch to make reference to that
> commit.
>
> How about this?
>
> ---
>
> From 8aabaf128c85bab02fdbe594481826e137c25da4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:59:47 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] firmware: dmi_scan: Prevent dmi_num integer overflow
>
> dmi_num is a u16, dmi_len is a u32, so this construct:
>
> dmi_num = dmi_len / 4;
>
> would result in an integer overflow for a DMI table larger than
> 256 kB. I've never see such a large table so far, but SMBIOS 3.0
> makes it possible so maybe we'll see such tables in the future.
>
> So instead of faking a structure count when the entry point does
> not provide it, adjust the loop condition in dmi_table() to properly
> deal with the case where dmi_num is not set.
>
> This potential overflow was introduced in commit 6d9ff4733172
> ("firmware: dmi_scan: Fix dmi_len type").
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
> Cc: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c | 22 +++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c b/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
> index 69fac068669f..2eebd28b4c40 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
> @@ -86,10 +86,13 @@ static void dmi_table(u8 *buf, u32 len, int num,
> int i = 0;
>
> /*
> - * Stop when we see all the items the table claimed to have
> - * OR we run off the end of the table (also happens)
> + * Stop when we have seen all the items the table claimed to have
> + * (SMBIOS < 3.0 only) OR we reach an end-of-table marker OR we run
> + * off the end of the table (should never happen but sometimes does
> + * on bogus implementations.)
> */
> - while ((i < num) && (data - buf + sizeof(struct dmi_header)) <= len) {
> + while ((!num || i < num) &&
> + (data - buf + sizeof(struct dmi_header)) <= len) {
> const struct dmi_header *dm = (const struct dmi_header *)data;
>
> /*
> @@ -529,21 +532,10 @@ static int __init dmi_smbios3_present(const u8 *buf)
> if (memcmp(buf, "_SM3_", 5) == 0 &&
> buf[6] < 32 && dmi_checksum(buf, buf[6])) {
> dmi_ver = get_unaligned_be16(buf + 7);
> + dmi_num = 0; /* No longer specified */
> dmi_len = get_unaligned_le32(buf + 12);
> dmi_base = get_unaligned_le64(buf + 16);
>
> - /*
> - * The 64-bit SMBIOS 3.0 entry point no longer has a field
> - * containing the number of structures present in the table.
> - * Instead, it defines the table size as a maximum size, and
> - * relies on the end-of-table structure type (#127) to be used
> - * to signal the end of the table.
> - * So let's define dmi_num as an upper bound as well: each
> - * structure has a 4 byte header, so dmi_len / 4 is an upper
> - * bound for the number of structures in the table.
> - */
> - dmi_num = dmi_len / 4;
> -
> if (dmi_walk_early(dmi_decode) == 0) {
> pr_info("SMBIOS %d.%d present.\n",
> dmi_ver >> 8, dmi_ver & 0xFF);
> --
> 2.1.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-26 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-20 8:59 Jean Delvare
2015-03-20 9:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-26 13:06 ` Matt Fleming
2015-03-26 13:15 ` Jean Delvare
2015-03-26 14:47 ` Matt Fleming
2015-03-26 15:21 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2015-03-27 12:12 ` Matt Fleming
2015-03-27 13:22 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1427383313.4261.7.camel@chaos.site \
--to=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®