From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: ARM64 does not have a BIOS add config for BIOS table scan.
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 23:06:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1430951.SWzYBgFe0M@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404290847-7671-2-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 04:47:23 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
>
> With the addition of ARM64 that does not have a traditional BIOS to
> scan, add a config option which is selected on x86 and ia64 to do
> the traditional BIOS scanning for tables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/ia64/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 3 +++
> drivers/acpi/osl.c | 4 +++-
> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
> index 2f3abcf..f82b352 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ config IA64
> select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA
> select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF
> select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
> + select ACPI_SCAN_BIOS_NOT_EFI
I would call this ACPI_LEGACY_TABLES_LOOKUP or something like that.
Also please do
+ select ACPI_LEGACY_TABLES_LOOKUP if ACPI
in analogy with patch [3/4] in this series.
> default y
> help
> The Itanium Processor Family is Intel's 64-bit successor to
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index a8f749e..4865d44 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ config X86
> select HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
> select GENERIC_CPU_AUTOPROBE
> select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
> + select ACPI_SCAN_BIOS_NOT_EFI
>
> config INSTRUCTION_DECODER
> def_bool y
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> index a34a228..70eaf7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
> # ACPI Configuration
> #
>
> +config ACPI_SCAN_BIOS_NOT_EFI
> + bool
> +
> menuconfig ACPI
> bool "ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) Support"
> depends on !IA64_HP_SIM
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> index bad25b0..5ba0b74 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> @@ -259,12 +259,14 @@ acpi_physical_address __init acpi_os_get_root_pointer(void)
> "System description tables not found\n");
> return 0;
> }
> - } else {
> + } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_SCAN_BIOS_NOT_EFI)) {
> acpi_physical_address pa = 0;
>
> acpi_find_root_pointer(&pa);
> return pa;
> }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /* Must be called with 'acpi_ioremap_lock' or RCU read lock held. */
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-07 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-02 8:47 [PATCH 0/4] Clean up ACPI core to prepare for running ACPI on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02 8:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: ARM64 does not have a BIOS add config for BIOS table scan Hanjun Guo
2014-07-07 21:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2014-07-08 9:55 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02 8:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: Don't use acpi_lapic in ACPI core code Hanjun Guo
2014-07-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-08 10:07 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02 8:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPI / processor: Introduce ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC Hanjun Guo
2014-07-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-08 9:58 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02 8:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: Make EC debugfs depend on X86 || IA64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2014-07-07 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-08 9:23 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1430951.SWzYBgFe0M@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®