From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ACPI / processor: Introduce ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 23:13:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2064691.ZpxCs0gfL8@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404290847-7671-4-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 04:47:25 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> The use of _PDC is deprecated in ACPI 3.0 in favor of _OSC,
> as ARM platform is supported only in ACPI 5.0 or higher version,
> _PDC will not be used in ARM platform, so make Make _PDC only for
> platforms with Intel CPUs.
>
> Introduce ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC and move _PDC related code in ACPI
> processor driver into a single file processor_pdc.c, make x86
> and ia64 select ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC when ACPI is enabled.
>
> This patch also use pr_* to replace printk to fix the checkpatch
> warning and factor acpi_processor_alloc_pdc() a little bit to
> avoid duplicate pr_err() code.
>
> Suggested-by: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/ia64/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 10 ++
> drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/acpi/internal.h | 5 +
> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 198 ---------------------------------------
> drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c | 206 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 7 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
> index f82b352..cde2626 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ config IA64
> select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_SERIO
> select PCI if (!IA64_HP_SIM)
> select ACPI if (!IA64_HP_SIM)
> + select ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC if ACPI
The ARCH_HAS part doesn't seem to be particularly consistent with
the existing naming. ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDC would be better IMO.
> select PM if (!IA64_HP_SIM)
> select HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
> select HAVE_IDE
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 4865d44..d60cec7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ config X86_64
> ### Arch settings
> config X86
> def_bool y
> + select ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC if ACPI
> select ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS
> select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_PARPORT
> select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_SERIO
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> index 70eaf7a..0e6f72d 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> @@ -367,6 +367,16 @@ config ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY
>
> If you are unsure what to do, do not enable this option.
>
> +config ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC
> + bool
> + help
> + The _PDC object provides OSPM a mechanism to convey to the platform
> + the capabilities supported by OSPM for processor power management.
> + This allows the platform to modify the ACPI namespace objects returning
> + configuration information for processor power management based on the
> + level of support provided by OSPM.The use of _PDC is deprecated in
> + ACPI 3.0 in favor of _OSC.
Is the help actually useful? This doesn't seem to be user-selectable, does it?
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-07 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-02 8:47 [PATCH 0/4] Clean up ACPI core to prepare for running ACPI on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02 8:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: ARM64 does not have a BIOS add config for BIOS table scan Hanjun Guo
2014-07-07 21:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-08 9:55 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02 8:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: Don't use acpi_lapic in ACPI core code Hanjun Guo
2014-07-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-08 10:07 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02 8:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPI / processor: Introduce ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC Hanjun Guo
2014-07-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2014-07-08 9:58 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02 8:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: Make EC debugfs depend on X86 || IA64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2014-07-07 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-08 9:23 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2064691.ZpxCs0gfL8@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®