From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] workqueue: ensure attrs-changing be sequentially
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:35:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431336953-3260-4-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431336953-3260-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Current modification to attrs via sysfs is not atomically.
Process A (change cpumask) | Process B (change numa affinity)
wq_cpumask_store() |
wq_sysfs_prep_attrs() |
| apply_workqueue_attrs()
apply_workqueue_attrs() |
It results that the Process B's operation is totally reverted
without any notification.
This behavior is acceptable but it is sometimes unexpected.
Sequential model on non-performance-sensitive operations is more popular
and preferred. So this patch moves wq_sysfs_prep_attrs() into the protection
under wq_pool_mutex to ensure attrs-changing be sequentially.
This patch is also a preparation patch for next patch which change
the API of apply_workqueue_attrs().
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index e7accc1..efd9a3a 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3646,24 +3646,25 @@ static void apply_wqattrs_commit(struct apply_wqattrs_ctx *ctx)
mutex_unlock(&ctx->wq->mutex);
}
-/**
- * apply_workqueue_attrs - apply new workqueue_attrs to an unbound workqueue
- * @wq: the target workqueue
- * @attrs: the workqueue_attrs to apply, allocated with alloc_workqueue_attrs()
- *
- * Apply @attrs to an unbound workqueue @wq. Unless disabled, on NUMA
- * machines, this function maps a separate pwq to each NUMA node with
- * possibles CPUs in @attrs->cpumask so that work items are affine to the
- * NUMA node it was issued on. Older pwqs are released as in-flight work
- * items finish. Note that a work item which repeatedly requeues itself
- * back-to-back will stay on its current pwq.
- *
- * Performs GFP_KERNEL allocations.
- *
- * Return: 0 on success and -errno on failure.
- */
-int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
- const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
+static void apply_wqattrs_lock(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * CPUs should stay stable across pwq creations and installations.
+ * Pin CPUs, determine the target cpumask for each node and create
+ * pwqs accordingly.
+ */
+ get_online_cpus();
+ mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+}
+
+static void apply_wqattrs_unlock(void)
+{
+ mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+ put_online_cpus();
+}
+
+static int apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+ const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
{
struct apply_wqattrs_ctx *ctx;
int ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -3676,14 +3677,6 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
if (WARN_ON((wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED) && !list_empty(&wq->pwqs)))
return -EINVAL;
- /*
- * CPUs should stay stable across pwq creations and installations.
- * Pin CPUs, determine the target cpumask for each node and create
- * pwqs accordingly.
- */
- get_online_cpus();
- mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
-
ctx = apply_wqattrs_prepare(wq, attrs);
/* the ctx has been prepared successfully, let's commit it */
@@ -3694,8 +3687,33 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
apply_wqattrs_cleanup(ctx);
- mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
- put_online_cpus();
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * apply_workqueue_attrs - apply new workqueue_attrs to an unbound workqueue
+ * @wq: the target workqueue
+ * @attrs: the workqueue_attrs to apply, allocated with alloc_workqueue_attrs()
+ *
+ * Apply @attrs to an unbound workqueue @wq. Unless disabled, on NUMA
+ * machines, this function maps a separate pwq to each NUMA node with
+ * possibles CPUs in @attrs->cpumask so that work items are affine to the
+ * NUMA node it was issued on. Older pwqs are released as in-flight work
+ * items finish. Note that a work item which repeatedly requeues itself
+ * back-to-back will stay on its current pwq.
+ *
+ * Performs GFP_KERNEL allocations.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success and -errno on failure.
+ */
+int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+ const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ apply_wqattrs_lock();
+ ret = apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(wq, attrs);
+ apply_wqattrs_unlock();
return ret;
}
@@ -4784,10 +4802,9 @@ int workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask(cpumask_var_t cpumask)
if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&saved_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL))
return -ENOMEM;
- get_online_cpus();
cpumask_and(cpumask, cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
if (!cpumask_empty(cpumask)) {
- mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+ apply_wqattrs_lock();
/* save the old wq_unbound_cpumask. */
cpumask_copy(saved_cpumask, wq_unbound_cpumask);
@@ -4800,9 +4817,8 @@ int workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask(cpumask_var_t cpumask)
if (ret < 0)
cpumask_copy(wq_unbound_cpumask, saved_cpumask);
- mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+ apply_wqattrs_unlock();
}
- put_online_cpus();
free_cpumask_var(saved_cpumask);
return ret;
@@ -4927,18 +4943,22 @@ static ssize_t wq_nice_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
{
struct workqueue_struct *wq = dev_to_wq(dev);
struct workqueue_attrs *attrs;
- int ret;
+ int ret = -ENOMEM;
+
+ apply_wqattrs_lock();
attrs = wq_sysfs_prep_attrs(wq);
if (!attrs)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ goto out_unlock;
if (sscanf(buf, "%d", &attrs->nice) == 1 &&
attrs->nice >= MIN_NICE && attrs->nice <= MAX_NICE)
- ret = apply_workqueue_attrs(wq, attrs);
+ ret = apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(wq, attrs);
else
ret = -EINVAL;
+out_unlock:
+ apply_wqattrs_unlock();
free_workqueue_attrs(attrs);
return ret ?: count;
}
@@ -4962,16 +4982,20 @@ static ssize_t wq_cpumask_store(struct device *dev,
{
struct workqueue_struct *wq = dev_to_wq(dev);
struct workqueue_attrs *attrs;
- int ret;
+ int ret = -ENOMEM;
+
+ apply_wqattrs_lock();
attrs = wq_sysfs_prep_attrs(wq);
if (!attrs)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ goto out_unlock;
ret = cpumask_parse(buf, attrs->cpumask);
if (!ret)
- ret = apply_workqueue_attrs(wq, attrs);
+ ret = apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(wq, attrs);
+out_unlock:
+ apply_wqattrs_unlock();
free_workqueue_attrs(attrs);
return ret ?: count;
}
@@ -4995,18 +5019,22 @@ static ssize_t wq_numa_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
{
struct workqueue_struct *wq = dev_to_wq(dev);
struct workqueue_attrs *attrs;
- int v, ret;
+ int v, ret = -ENOMEM;
+
+ apply_wqattrs_lock();
attrs = wq_sysfs_prep_attrs(wq);
if (!attrs)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ goto out_unlock;
ret = -EINVAL;
if (sscanf(buf, "%d", &v) == 1) {
attrs->no_numa = !v;
- ret = apply_workqueue_attrs(wq, attrs);
+ ret = apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(wq, attrs);
}
+out_unlock:
+ apply_wqattrs_unlock();
free_workqueue_attrs(attrs);
return ret ?: count;
}
--
2.1.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-11 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-11 9:35 [PATCH 0/5] workqueue: cleanup for apply_workqueue_attrs() Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-11 9:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] workqueue: wq_pool_mutex protects the attrs-installation Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-11 12:23 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-10 21:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-03-11 17:50 ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-11 20:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 15:09 ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-12 15:20 ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-12 15:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-11 9:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] workqueue: merge the similar code Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-11 14:31 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 2:03 ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 13:16 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-11 9:35 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2015-05-11 14:55 ` [PATCH 3/5] workqueue: ensure attrs-changing be sequentially Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 5:09 ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 13:19 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-11 9:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] workqueue: don't expose workqueue_attrs to users Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-11 14:59 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 2:15 ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 13:22 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-13 1:43 ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-13 13:52 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-11 9:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: remove no_numa from workqueue_attrs Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1431336953-3260-4-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®