mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: remove no_numa from workqueue_attrs
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:35:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431336953-3260-6-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431336953-3260-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

The structure workqueue_attrs is used both on workqueue and worker_pool,
but ->no_numa isn't a property of a worker_pool and requires special
comments or code when it is used on worker_pool.

This patch simply removes ->no_numa from workqueue_attrs along with
the special comments and code. The numa affinity is stored at
wq->numa instead.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 44 ++++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index b08df98..42721a2 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -108,15 +108,10 @@ enum {
 /*
  * A struct for workqueue attributes.  This can be used to change
  * attributes of an unbound workqueue.
- *
- * Unlike other fields, ->no_numa isn't a property of a worker_pool.  It
- * only modifies how apply_workqueue_attrs() select pools and thus doesn't
- * participate in pool hash calculations or equality comparisons.
  */
 struct workqueue_attrs {
 	int			nice;		/* nice level */
 	cpumask_var_t		cpumask;	/* allowed CPUs */
-	bool			no_numa;	/* disable NUMA affinity */
 };
 
 /*
@@ -267,8 +262,10 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
 	int			nr_drainers;	/* WQ: drain in progress */
 	int			saved_max_active; /* WQ: saved pwq max_active */
 
-	struct workqueue_attrs	*unbound_attrs;	/* PW: only for unbound wqs */
-	struct pool_workqueue	*dfl_pwq;	/* PW: only for unbound wqs */
+	/* The following fields are only for unbound wqs. */
+	struct workqueue_attrs	*unbound_attrs;	/* PW: configure attrs */
+	bool			numa;		/* PW: enable per-node pwqs */
+	struct pool_workqueue	*dfl_pwq;	/* PW: the default pwq */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
 	struct wq_device	*wq_dev;	/* I: for sysfs interface */
@@ -3069,12 +3066,6 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
 {
 	to->nice = from->nice;
 	cpumask_copy(to->cpumask, from->cpumask);
-	/*
-	 * Unlike hash and equality test, this function doesn't ignore
-	 * ->no_numa as it is used for both pool and wq attrs.  Instead,
-	 * get_unbound_pool() explicitly clears ->no_numa after copying.
-	 */
-	to->no_numa = from->no_numa;
 }
 
 /* hash value of the content of @attr */
@@ -3265,12 +3256,6 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
 	lockdep_set_subclass(&pool->lock, 1);	/* see put_pwq() */
 	copy_workqueue_attrs(pool->attrs, attrs);
 
-	/*
-	 * no_numa isn't a worker_pool attribute, always clear it.  See
-	 * 'struct workqueue_attrs' comments for detail.
-	 */
-	pool->attrs->no_numa = false;
-
 	/* if cpumask is contained inside a NUMA node, we belong to that node */
 	if (wq_numa_enabled) {
 		for_each_node(node) {
@@ -3491,8 +3476,8 @@ alloc_node_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 	/*
 	 * We don't wanna alloc/free wq_attrs for each call.  Let's use a
 	 * preallocated one.  It is protected by wq_pool_mutex.
-	 * tmp_attrs->cpumask will be updated in next and tmp_attrs->no_numa
-	 * is not used, so we just need to initialize tmp_attrs->nice;
+	 * tmp_attrs->cpumask will be updated in next, so we just need
+	 * to initialize tmp_attrs->nice;
 	 */
 	tmp_attrs = wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf;
 	tmp_attrs->nice = attrs->nice;
@@ -3552,6 +3537,7 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *numa_pwq_tbl_install(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 struct apply_wqattrs_ctx {
 	struct workqueue_struct	*wq;		/* target workqueue */
 	struct workqueue_attrs	*attrs;		/* attrs to apply */
+	bool			numa;		/* enalbe per-node pwqs */
 	struct list_head	list;		/* queued for batching commit */
 	struct pool_workqueue	*dfl_pwq;
 	struct pool_workqueue	*pwq_tbl[];
@@ -3598,7 +3584,6 @@ apply_wqattrs_prepare(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 	 */
 	cpumask_and(new_attrs->cpumask, cpumask, wq_unbound_cpumask);
 	new_attrs->nice = nice;
-	new_attrs->no_numa = !numa;
 	if (unlikely(cpumask_empty(new_attrs->cpumask)))
 		cpumask_copy(new_attrs->cpumask, wq_unbound_cpumask);
 
@@ -3622,6 +3607,7 @@ apply_wqattrs_prepare(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 	/* save the user configured attrs and sanitize it. */
 	cpumask_and(new_attrs->cpumask, cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
 	ctx->attrs = new_attrs;
+	ctx->numa = numa;
 
 	ctx->wq = wq;
 	return ctx;
@@ -3641,6 +3627,7 @@ static void apply_wqattrs_commit(struct apply_wqattrs_ctx *ctx)
 	mutex_lock(&ctx->wq->mutex);
 
 	copy_workqueue_attrs(ctx->wq->unbound_attrs, ctx->attrs);
+	ctx->wq->numa = ctx->numa;
 
 	/* save the previous pwq and install the new one */
 	for_each_node(node)
@@ -3760,8 +3747,7 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
-	if (!wq_numa_enabled || !(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) ||
-	    wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa)
+	if (!wq_numa_enabled || !(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) || !wq->numa)
 		return;
 
 	pwq = alloc_node_unbound_pwq(wq, wq->dfl_pwq, true, node, cpu_off,
@@ -4778,8 +4764,7 @@ static int workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask(void)
 			continue;
 
 		ctx = apply_wqattrs_prepare(wq, wq->unbound_attrs->cpumask,
-					    wq->unbound_attrs->nice,
-					    !wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa);
+					    wq->unbound_attrs->nice, wq->numa);
 		if (!ctx) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
 			break;
@@ -4951,7 +4936,7 @@ static ssize_t wq_nice_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
 
 	apply_wqattrs_lock();
 	ret = apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(wq, wq->unbound_attrs->cpumask,
-					   nice, !wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa);
+					   nice, wq->numa);
 	apply_wqattrs_unlock();
 
 	return ret ?: count;
@@ -4986,7 +4971,7 @@ static ssize_t wq_cpumask_store(struct device *dev,
 
 	apply_wqattrs_lock();
 	ret = apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(wq, cpumask, wq->unbound_attrs->nice,
-					   !wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa);
+					   wq->numa);
 	apply_wqattrs_unlock();
 
 	free_cpumask_var(cpumask);
@@ -5000,8 +4985,7 @@ static ssize_t wq_numa_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
 	int written;
 
 	mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
-	written = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n",
-			    !wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa);
+	written = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", wq->numa);
 	mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
 
 	return written;
-- 
2.1.0


      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-11  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-11  9:35 [PATCH 0/5] workqueue: cleanup for apply_workqueue_attrs() Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-11  9:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] workqueue: wq_pool_mutex protects the attrs-installation Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-11 12:23   ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-10 21:44   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-03-11 17:50     ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-11 20:50     ` Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 15:09       ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-12 15:20         ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-12 15:23           ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-11  9:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] workqueue: merge the similar code Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-11 14:31   ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12  2:03     ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 13:16       ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-11  9:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] workqueue: ensure attrs-changing be sequentially Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-11 14:55   ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12  5:09     ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 13:19       ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-11  9:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] workqueue: don't expose workqueue_attrs to users Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-11 14:59   ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12  2:15     ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 13:22       ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-13  1:43         ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-13 13:52           ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-11  9:35 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1431336953-3260-6-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®