mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/7 V2] workqueue: simplify wq_update_unbound_numa()
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 20:32:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431433955-3173-3-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431433955-3173-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

wq_update_unbound_numa() is known be called with wq_pool_mutex held.

But wq_update_unbound_numa() requests wq->mutex before reading
wq->unbound_attrs, wq->numa_pwq_tbl[] and wq->dfl_pwq.  But these fields
were changed to be allowed being read with wq_pool_mutex held.  So we
simply remove the mutex_lock(&wq->mutex).

Without the dependence on the the mutex_lock(&wq->mutex), the test
of wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa can also be moved upward.

The old code need a long comment to describe the stableness of
@wq->unbound_attrs which is also guaranteed by wq_pool_mutex now,
so we don't need this such comment.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 20 +++++---------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index f02b8ad..c8b9de0 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3708,7 +3708,8 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
-	if (!wq_numa_enabled || !(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
+	if (!wq_numa_enabled || !(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) ||
+	    wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa)
 		return;
 
 	/*
@@ -3719,10 +3720,6 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
 	target_attrs = wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf;
 	cpumask = target_attrs->cpumask;
 
-	mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
-	if (wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa)
-		goto out_unlock;
-
 	copy_workqueue_attrs(target_attrs, wq->unbound_attrs);
 	pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, node);
 
@@ -3734,33 +3731,26 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
 	 */
 	if (wq_calc_node_cpumask(wq->dfl_pwq->pool->attrs, node, cpu_off, cpumask)) {
 		if (cpumask_equal(cpumask, pwq->pool->attrs->cpumask))
-			goto out_unlock;
+			return;
 	} else {
 		goto use_dfl_pwq;
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
-
 	/* create a new pwq */
 	pwq = alloc_unbound_pwq(wq, target_attrs);
 	if (!pwq) {
 		pr_warn("workqueue: allocation failed while updating NUMA affinity of \"%s\"\n",
 			wq->name);
-		mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
 		goto use_dfl_pwq;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * Install the new pwq.  As this function is called only from CPU
-	 * hotplug callbacks and applying a new attrs is wrapped with
-	 * get/put_online_cpus(), @wq->unbound_attrs couldn't have changed
-	 * inbetween.
-	 */
+	/* Install the new pwq. */
 	mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
 	old_pwq = numa_pwq_tbl_install(wq, node, pwq);
 	goto out_unlock;
 
 use_dfl_pwq:
+	mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
 	spin_lock_irq(&wq->dfl_pwq->pool->lock);
 	get_pwq(wq->dfl_pwq);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&wq->dfl_pwq->pool->lock);
-- 
2.1.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-12 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-12 12:32 [PATCH 0/7 V2] workqueue: cleanup for attr management Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 1/7 V2] workqueue: wq_pool_mutex protects the attrs-installation Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 12:32 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2015-05-18 20:21   ` [PATCH 2/7 V2] workqueue: simplify wq_update_unbound_numa() Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 3/7 V2] workqueue: introduce get_pwq_unlocked() Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:28   ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-18 20:41   ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 4/7 V2] workqueue: reuse the current per-node pwq when its attrs unchanged Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:34   ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-25  9:47   ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-26 18:51     ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 5/7 V2] workqueue: reuse the current default " Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:38   ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 6/7 V2] workqueue: reuse wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf as temporary attrs Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 7/7 V2] workqueue: add get_node_unbound_pwq() Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18  0:39 ` [PATCH 0/7 V2] workqueue: cleanup for attr management Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18  1:26   ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-18  2:06     ` Lai Jiangshan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1431433955-3173-3-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®