From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/7 V2] workqueue: simplify wq_update_unbound_numa()
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 20:32:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431433955-3173-3-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431433955-3173-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
wq_update_unbound_numa() is known be called with wq_pool_mutex held.
But wq_update_unbound_numa() requests wq->mutex before reading
wq->unbound_attrs, wq->numa_pwq_tbl[] and wq->dfl_pwq. But these fields
were changed to be allowed being read with wq_pool_mutex held. So we
simply remove the mutex_lock(&wq->mutex).
Without the dependence on the the mutex_lock(&wq->mutex), the test
of wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa can also be moved upward.
The old code need a long comment to describe the stableness of
@wq->unbound_attrs which is also guaranteed by wq_pool_mutex now,
so we don't need this such comment.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 20 +++++---------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index f02b8ad..c8b9de0 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3708,7 +3708,8 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
- if (!wq_numa_enabled || !(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
+ if (!wq_numa_enabled || !(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) ||
+ wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa)
return;
/*
@@ -3719,10 +3720,6 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
target_attrs = wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf;
cpumask = target_attrs->cpumask;
- mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
- if (wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa)
- goto out_unlock;
-
copy_workqueue_attrs(target_attrs, wq->unbound_attrs);
pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, node);
@@ -3734,33 +3731,26 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
*/
if (wq_calc_node_cpumask(wq->dfl_pwq->pool->attrs, node, cpu_off, cpumask)) {
if (cpumask_equal(cpumask, pwq->pool->attrs->cpumask))
- goto out_unlock;
+ return;
} else {
goto use_dfl_pwq;
}
- mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
-
/* create a new pwq */
pwq = alloc_unbound_pwq(wq, target_attrs);
if (!pwq) {
pr_warn("workqueue: allocation failed while updating NUMA affinity of \"%s\"\n",
wq->name);
- mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
goto use_dfl_pwq;
}
- /*
- * Install the new pwq. As this function is called only from CPU
- * hotplug callbacks and applying a new attrs is wrapped with
- * get/put_online_cpus(), @wq->unbound_attrs couldn't have changed
- * inbetween.
- */
+ /* Install the new pwq. */
mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
old_pwq = numa_pwq_tbl_install(wq, node, pwq);
goto out_unlock;
use_dfl_pwq:
+ mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
spin_lock_irq(&wq->dfl_pwq->pool->lock);
get_pwq(wq->dfl_pwq);
spin_unlock_irq(&wq->dfl_pwq->pool->lock);
--
2.1.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-12 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-12 12:32 [PATCH 0/7 V2] workqueue: cleanup for attr management Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 1/7 V2] workqueue: wq_pool_mutex protects the attrs-installation Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 12:32 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2015-05-18 20:21 ` [PATCH 2/7 V2] workqueue: simplify wq_update_unbound_numa() Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 3/7 V2] workqueue: introduce get_pwq_unlocked() Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:28 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-18 20:41 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 4/7 V2] workqueue: reuse the current per-node pwq when its attrs unchanged Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:34 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-25 9:47 ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-26 18:51 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 5/7 V2] workqueue: reuse the current default " Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:38 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 6/7 V2] workqueue: reuse wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf as temporary attrs Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 7/7 V2] workqueue: add get_node_unbound_pwq() Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 0:39 ` [PATCH 0/7 V2] workqueue: cleanup for attr management Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 1:26 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-18 2:06 ` Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1431433955-3173-3-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®