From: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
To: <wangnan0@huawei.com>, <paulus@samba.org>,
<a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <acme@kernel.org>,
<namhyung@kernel.org>, <jolsa@kernel.org>, <ast@plumgrid.com>,
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>, <dsahern@gmail.com>,
<brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: <lizefan@huawei.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 05/15] perf tools: Add pt_regs offsets and calling regs for x86
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 08:28:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432456091-73384-6-git-send-email-hekuang@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432456091-73384-1-git-send-email-hekuang@huawei.com>
Combine pt_regs offset of each registers into arch_regs_table. And add
architecture dependent calling_regs_table.
Signed-off-by: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
---
tools/perf/arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c
index be22dd4..c7f2309 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c
@@ -22,54 +22,112 @@
#include <stddef.h>
#include <dwarf-regs.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <linux/ptrace.h>
/*
* Generic dwarf analysis helpers
*/
+#ifndef __x86_64__
#define X86_32_MAX_REGS 8
-const char *x86_32_regs_table[X86_32_MAX_REGS] = {
- "%ax",
+const struct arch_regs_info x86_32_regs_table[X86_32_MAX_REGS] = {
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%ax", eax),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%cx", ecx),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%dx", edx),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%bx", ebx),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("$stack", esp), /* Stack address instead of %sp */
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%bp", ebp),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%si", esi),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%di", edi),
+};
+
+#define X86_32_MAX_CALLING_REGS (2)
+const char *x86_32_calling_regs_table[] = {
"%cx",
"%dx",
- "%bx",
- "$stack", /* Stack address instead of %sp */
- "%bp",
- "%si",
- "%di",
};
+#else
#define X86_64_MAX_REGS 16
-const char *x86_64_regs_table[X86_64_MAX_REGS] = {
- "%ax",
+const struct arch_regs_info x86_64_regs_table[X86_64_MAX_REGS] = {
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%ax", rax),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%dx", rdx),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%cx", rcx),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%bx", rbx),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%si", rsi),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%di", rdi),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%bp", rbp),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%sp", rsp),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%r8", r8),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%r9", r9),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%r10", r10),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%r11", r11),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%r12", r12),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%r13", r13),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%r14", r14),
+ ARCH_REGS_INFO("%r15", r15),
+};
+
+#define X86_64_MAX_CALLING_REGS (6)
+const char *x86_64_calling_regs_table[] = {
+ "%di",
+ "%si",
"%dx",
"%cx",
- "%bx",
- "%si",
- "%di",
- "%bp",
- "%sp",
"%r8",
"%r9",
- "%r10",
- "%r11",
- "%r12",
- "%r13",
- "%r14",
- "%r15",
};
+#endif
+
/* TODO: switching by dwarf address size */
#ifdef __x86_64__
#define ARCH_MAX_REGS X86_64_MAX_REGS
#define arch_regs_table x86_64_regs_table
+#define ARCH_MAX_CALLING_REGS X86_64_MAX_CALLING_REGS
+#define arch_calling_regs_table x86_64_calling_regs_table
#else
#define ARCH_MAX_REGS X86_32_MAX_REGS
#define arch_regs_table x86_32_regs_table
+#define ARCH_MAX_CALLING_REGS X86_32_MAX_CALLING_REGS
+#define arch_calling_regs_table x86_32_calling_regs_table
#endif
/* Return architecture dependent register string (for kprobe-tracer) */
const char *get_arch_regstr(unsigned int n)
{
- return (n <= ARCH_MAX_REGS) ? arch_regs_table[n] : NULL;
+ return (n < ARCH_MAX_REGS) ? arch_regs_table[n].name : NULL;
+}
+
+int get_arch_reg_offset(unsigned int n)
+{
+ return (n < ARCH_MAX_REGS) ? arch_regs_table[n].offset : -1;
+}
+
+int get_arch_reg_size(unsigned int n)
+{
+ return (n < ARCH_MAX_REGS) ? arch_regs_table[n].size : -1;
+}
+
+const char *get_arch_calling_reg_str(unsigned int n)
+{
+ return (n < ARCH_MAX_CALLING_REGS) ?
+ arch_calling_regs_table[n] : NULL;
+}
+
+int get_arch_calling_reg_offset(unsigned int n)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ if (n >= ARCH_MAX_CALLING_REGS)
+ return -1;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARCH_MAX_REGS; i++) {
+ if (!strcmp(arch_calling_regs_table[n],
+ arch_regs_table[i].name))
+ return arch_regs_table[i].offset;
+ }
+
+ return -1;
}
--
1.8.5.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-24 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-24 8:27 [RFC PATCH v2 00/15] perf bpf: Probing with local variable He Kuang
2015-05-24 8:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/15] perf tools: Add lib/bpf to cscope target list He Kuang
2015-05-24 8:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/15] perf bpf: Support custom vmlinux path He Kuang
2015-05-24 8:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/15] perf bpf: Save pt_regs info from debuginfo He Kuang
2015-05-24 13:31 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-05-25 7:38 ` He Kuang
2015-05-24 8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/15] perf tools: Add functions to get calling regs He Kuang
2015-05-24 8:28 ` He Kuang [this message]
2015-05-24 8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/15] bpf tools: Add headers for generating bpf bytecode He Kuang
2015-05-24 8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/15] bpf tools: Convert arglist to bpf prologue He Kuang
2015-05-24 8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/15] bpf tools: Fetch calling regs to bpf arglist He Kuang
2015-05-24 8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/15] perf probe: Support $params without debuginfo He Kuang
2015-05-24 8:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-05-25 8:33 ` He Kuang
2015-05-25 12:22 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-05-25 12:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-05-25 13:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-05-26 17:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-05-27 2:27 ` He Kuang
2015-05-27 11:43 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-05-27 15:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-05-28 13:01 ` He Kuang
2015-05-28 18:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-05-29 6:30 ` He Kuang
2015-05-29 23:55 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-05-30 1:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-05-30 7:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-05-24 8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/15] perf bpf: Process debuginfo for generating bpf prologue He Kuang
2015-05-24 8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/15] perf bpf: Synthesize vars to generate " He Kuang
2015-05-24 8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/15] perf bpf: Generate bpf prologue without debuginfo He Kuang
2015-05-24 8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/15] perf bpf: Combine bpf prologue and bpf prog He Kuang
2015-05-24 8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/15] samples/bpf: Add sample for testing bpf fetch args He Kuang
2015-05-24 8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/15] samples/bpf: Add sample for no-debuginfo case He Kuang
2015-05-26 17:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1432456091-73384-6-git-send-email-hekuang@huawei.com \
--to=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®