From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
bobby.prani@gmail.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/14] rcu: Consolidate last open-coded expedited memory barrier
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:25:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435703154-14659-11-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435703154-14659-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
One of the requirements on RCU grace periods is that if there is a
causal chain of operations that starts after one grace period and
ends before another grace period, then the two grace periods must
be serialized. There has been (and might still be) code that relies
on this, for example, certain types of reference-counting code that
does a call_rcu() within an RCU callback function.
This requirement is why there is an smp_mb() at the end of both
synchronize_sched_expedited() and synchronize_rcu_expedited().
However, this is the only smp_mb() in these functions, so it would
be nicer to consolidate it into rcu_exp_gp_seq_end(). This commit
does just that.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 041968e3b7ce..e64416ad5c45 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3351,6 +3351,7 @@ static void rcu_exp_gp_seq_start(struct rcu_state *rsp)
static void rcu_exp_gp_seq_end(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
rcu_seq_end(&rsp->expedited_sequence);
+ smp_mb(); /* Ensure that consecutive grace periods serialize. */
}
static unsigned long rcu_exp_gp_seq_snap(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
@@ -3483,7 +3484,6 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
rcu_exp_gp_seq_end(rsp);
mutex_unlock(&rnp->exp_funnel_mutex);
- smp_mb(); /* ensure subsequent action seen after grace period. */
put_online_cpus();
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index f5055b6b08a0..4225efe8086d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -735,7 +735,6 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
/* Clean up and exit. */
rcu_exp_gp_seq_end(rsp);
mutex_unlock(&rnp_unlock->exp_funnel_mutex);
- smp_mb(); /* ensure subsequent action seen after grace period. */
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_expedited);
--
1.8.1.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-30 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-30 22:25 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/14] Rework expedited grace periods Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/14] rcu: Switch synchronize_sched_expedited() to stop_one_cpu() Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/14] rcu: Rework synchronize_rcu_expedited() counter handling Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/14] rcu: Get rid of synchronize_sched_expedited()'s polling loop Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/14] rcu: Make expedited GP CPU stoppage asynchronous Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/14] rcu: Abstract sequence counting from synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 22:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02 8:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-02 14:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02 16:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-09 8:42 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-07-09 14:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/14] rcu: Make synchronize_rcu_expedited() use sequence-counter scheme Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/14] rcu: Abstract funnel locking from synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/14] rcu: Fix synchronize_sched_expedited() type error for "s" Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/14] rcu: Use funnel locking for synchronize_rcu_expedited()'s polling loop Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/14] rcu: Apply rcu_seq operations to _rcu_barrier() Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/14] rcu: Extend expedited funnel locking to rcu_data structure Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 13/14] rcu: Add stall warnings to synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] documentation: Describe new expedited stall warnings Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1435703154-14659-11-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®