From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
bobby.prani@gmail.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/14] rcu: Use funnel locking for synchronize_rcu_expedited()'s polling loop
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:25:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435703154-14659-9-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435703154-14659-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit gets rid of synchronize_rcu_expedited()'s mutex_trylock()
polling loop in favor of the funnel-locking scheme that was abstracted
from synchronize_sched_expedited().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 15 ++++++++-------
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 36 ++++++++++--------------------------
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 65ba4977b200..2ade4592aa70 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3361,9 +3361,9 @@ static bool rcu_exp_gp_seq_done(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long s)
return rcu_seq_done(&rsp->expedited_sequence, s);
}
-/* Common code for synchronize_sched_expedited() work-done checking. */
-static bool sync_sched_exp_wd(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
- atomic_long_t *stat, unsigned long s)
+/* Common code for synchronize_{rcu,sched}_expedited() work-done checking. */
+static bool sync_exp_work_done(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
+ atomic_long_t *stat, unsigned long s)
{
if (rcu_exp_gp_seq_done(rsp, s)) {
if (rnp)
@@ -3371,7 +3371,6 @@ static bool sync_sched_exp_wd(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
/* Ensure test happens before caller kfree(). */
smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* ^^^ */
atomic_long_inc(stat);
- put_online_cpus();
return true;
}
return false;
@@ -3397,14 +3396,14 @@ static struct rcu_node *exp_funnel_lock(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long s)
*/
rnp0 = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, raw_smp_processor_id())->mynode;
for (; rnp0 != NULL; rnp0 = rnp0->parent) {
- if (sync_sched_exp_wd(rsp, rnp1, &rsp->expedited_workdone1, s))
+ if (sync_exp_work_done(rsp, rnp1, &rsp->expedited_workdone1, s))
return NULL;
mutex_lock(&rnp0->exp_funnel_mutex);
if (rnp1)
mutex_unlock(&rnp1->exp_funnel_mutex);
rnp1 = rnp0;
}
- if (sync_sched_exp_wd(rsp, rnp1, &rsp->expedited_workdone2, s))
+ if (sync_exp_work_done(rsp, rnp1, &rsp->expedited_workdone2, s))
return NULL;
return rnp1;
}
@@ -3454,8 +3453,10 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_is_offline(raw_smp_processor_id()));
rnp = exp_funnel_lock(rsp, s);
- if (rnp == NULL)
+ if (rnp == NULL) {
+ put_online_cpus();
return; /* Someone else did our work for us. */
+ }
rcu_exp_gp_seq_start(rsp);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 190213ffad19..f5055b6b08a0 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -536,7 +536,6 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu);
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq);
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex);
/*
* Return non-zero if there are any tasks in RCU read-side critical
@@ -556,7 +555,7 @@ static int rcu_preempted_readers_exp(struct rcu_node *rnp)
* for the current expedited grace period. Works only for preemptible
* RCU -- other RCU implementation use other means.
*
- * Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex.
+ * Caller must hold the root rcu_node's exp_funnel_mutex.
*/
static int sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(struct rcu_node *rnp)
{
@@ -572,7 +571,7 @@ static int sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(struct rcu_node *rnp)
* recursively up the tree. (Calm down, calm down, we do the recursion
* iteratively!)
*
- * Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex.
+ * Caller must hold the root rcu_node's exp_funnel_mutex.
*/
static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
bool wake)
@@ -611,7 +610,7 @@ static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
* set the ->expmask bits on the leaf rcu_node structures to tell phase 2
* that work is needed here.
*
- * Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex.
+ * Caller must hold the root rcu_node's exp_funnel_mutex.
*/
static void
sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init1(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
@@ -654,7 +653,7 @@ sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init1(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
* invoke rcu_report_exp_rnp() to clear out the upper-level ->expmask bits,
* enabling rcu_read_unlock_special() to do the bit-clearing.
*
- * Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex.
+ * Caller must hold the root rcu_node's exp_funnel_mutex.
*/
static void
sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init2(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
@@ -702,29 +701,16 @@ sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init2(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
{
struct rcu_node *rnp;
+ struct rcu_node *rnp_unlock;
struct rcu_state *rsp = rcu_state_p;
unsigned long s;
- int trycount = 0;
s = rcu_exp_gp_seq_snap(rsp);
- /*
- * Acquire lock, falling back to synchronize_rcu() if too many
- * lock-acquisition failures. Of course, if someone does the
- * expedited grace period for us, just leave.
- */
- while (!mutex_trylock(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex)) {
- if (rcu_exp_gp_seq_done(rsp, s))
- goto mb_ret; /* Others did our work for us. */
- if (trycount++ < 10) {
- udelay(trycount * num_online_cpus());
- } else {
- wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu);
- return;
- }
- }
- if (rcu_exp_gp_seq_done(rsp, s))
- goto unlock_mb_ret; /* Others did our work for us. */
+ rnp_unlock = exp_funnel_lock(rsp, s);
+ if (rnp_unlock == NULL)
+ return; /* Someone else did our work for us. */
+
rcu_exp_gp_seq_start(rsp);
/* force all RCU readers onto ->blkd_tasks lists. */
@@ -748,9 +734,7 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
/* Clean up and exit. */
rcu_exp_gp_seq_end(rsp);
-unlock_mb_ret:
- mutex_unlock(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex);
-mb_ret:
+ mutex_unlock(&rnp_unlock->exp_funnel_mutex);
smp_mb(); /* ensure subsequent action seen after grace period. */
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_expedited);
--
1.8.1.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-30 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-30 22:25 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/14] Rework expedited grace periods Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/14] rcu: Switch synchronize_sched_expedited() to stop_one_cpu() Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/14] rcu: Rework synchronize_rcu_expedited() counter handling Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/14] rcu: Get rid of synchronize_sched_expedited()'s polling loop Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/14] rcu: Make expedited GP CPU stoppage asynchronous Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/14] rcu: Abstract sequence counting from synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 22:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02 8:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-02 14:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02 16:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-09 8:42 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-07-09 14:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/14] rcu: Make synchronize_rcu_expedited() use sequence-counter scheme Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/14] rcu: Abstract funnel locking from synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/14] rcu: Fix synchronize_sched_expedited() type error for "s" Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/14] rcu: Apply rcu_seq operations to _rcu_barrier() Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/14] rcu: Consolidate last open-coded expedited memory barrier Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/14] rcu: Extend expedited funnel locking to rcu_data structure Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 13/14] rcu: Add stall warnings to synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] documentation: Describe new expedited stall warnings Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1435703154-14659-9-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®