* [PATCH] bonding: "primary_reselect" with "failure" is not working properly
@ 2015-07-02 10:13 Mazhar Rana
2015-07-02 11:35 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mazhar Rana @ 2015-07-02 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, j.vosburgh, vfalico, gospo
Cc: Mazhar Rana, davem, sanket.shah, mazhar.rana, linux-kernel
When "primary_reselect" is set to "failure", primary interface should
not become active until current active slave is up. But if we set first
member of bond device as a "primary" interface and "primary_reselect"
is set to "failure" then whenever primary interface's link get back(up)
it become active slave even if current active slave is still up.
With this patch, "bond_find_best_slave" will not traverse members if
primary interface is not candidate for failover/reselection and current
active slave is still up.
Signed-off-by: Mazhar Rana <mazhar.rana@cyberoam.com>
Reviewed-by: Sanket Shah <sanket.shah@cyberoam.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 19eb990..ac71261 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static bool bond_should_change_active(struct bonding *bond)
*/
static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
{
- struct slave *slave, *bestslave = NULL, *primary;
+ struct slave *slave, *bestslave = NULL, *primary, *curr;
struct list_head *iter;
int mintime = bond->params.updelay;
@@ -724,6 +724,14 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
bond_should_change_active(bond))
return primary;
+ /* We are here means primary interface is not candidate for
+ * reslection/failover. If currenet active slave is still up
+ * then there is no meaning to traverse members.
+ */
+ curr = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
+ if (curr && curr->link == BOND_LINK_UP)
+ return bond->curr_active_slave;
+
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
if (slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP)
return slave;
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] bonding: "primary_reselect" with "failure" is not working properly
2015-07-02 10:13 [PATCH] bonding: "primary_reselect" with "failure" is not working properly Mazhar Rana
@ 2015-07-02 11:35 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <559526F3.3000200@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2015-07-02 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mazhar Rana
Cc: netdev, j.vosburgh, vfalico, gospo, davem, sanket.shah,
mazhar.rana, linux-kernel
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 15:43 +0530, Mazhar Rana wrote:
> When "primary_reselect" is set to "failure", primary interface should
> not become active until current active slave is up. But if we set first
> member of bond device as a "primary" interface and "primary_reselect"
> is set to "failure" then whenever primary interface's link get back(up)
> it become active slave even if current active slave is still up.
>
> With this patch, "bond_find_best_slave" will not traverse members if
> primary interface is not candidate for failover/reselection and current
> active slave is still up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mazhar Rana <mazhar.rana@cyberoam.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sanket Shah <sanket.shah@cyberoam.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 19eb990..ac71261 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static bool bond_should_change_active(struct bonding *bond)
> */
> static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
> {
> - struct slave *slave, *bestslave = NULL, *primary;
> + struct slave *slave, *bestslave = NULL, *primary, *curr;
> struct list_head *iter;
> int mintime = bond->params.updelay;
>
> @@ -724,6 +724,14 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
> bond_should_change_active(bond))
> return primary;
>
> + /* We are here means primary interface is not candidate for
> + * reslection/failover. If currenet active slave is still up
> + * then there is no meaning to traverse members.
> + */
> + curr = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
Here you carefully use rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave)
(This is good)
> + if (curr && curr->link == BOND_LINK_UP)
> + return bond->curr_active_slave;
But here you return bond->curr_active_slave
instead of curr
> +
> bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
> if (slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP)
> return slave;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-02 17:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-07-02 10:13 [PATCH] bonding: "primary_reselect" with "failure" is not working properly Mazhar Rana
2015-07-02 11:35 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <559526F3.3000200@gmail.com>
2015-07-02 17:57 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®