* [PATCH] x86, perf: Handle multiple umask bits for BDW CYCLE_ACTIVITY.*
@ 2015-09-21 22:17 Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2015-09-21 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: peterz; +Cc: linux-kernel, Andi Kleen
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
The earlier constraint fix for Broadwell CYCLE_ACTIVITY.*
forced umask 8 to counter 2. For this it used UEVENT,
to match the complete umask.
The event list for Broadwell has an additional
CYC_ACT.STALLS_L1D_PENDIND event that uses umask 8, but also
sets other bits in the umask. The earlier strict umask match
didn't handle this case.
Add a new UBIT_EVENT constraint macro that only matches
the specified bits in the umask. Then use that macro
to handle CYCLE_ACTIVITY.* on Broadwell.
Reported-by: Grant Ayers
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h | 4 ++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
index 953a0e4..285fce3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
@@ -317,6 +317,10 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
#define INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n) \
EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK)
+/* Constraint on specific umask bit only + event */
+#define INTEL_UBIT_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n) \
+ EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT|(c))
+
/* Like UEVENT_CONSTRAINT, but match flags too */
#define INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n) \
EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK|X86_ALL_EVENT_FLAGS)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 1d84b41..7ebc594 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ struct event_constraint intel_bdw_event_constraints[] = {
FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x003c, 1), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.CORE */
FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0300, 2), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF */
INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x148, 0x4), /* L1D_PEND_MISS.PENDING */
- INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x8a3, 0x4), /* CYCLE_ACTIVITY.CYCLES_L1D_MISS */
+ INTEL_UBIT_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x8a3, 0x4), /* CYCLE_ACTIVITY.CYCLES_L1D_MISS */
EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END
};
--
2.4.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] x86, perf: Handle multiple umask bits for BDW CYCLE_ACTIVITY.*
@ 2015-11-17 0:21 Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2015-11-17 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: peterz; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, Andi Kleen
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
The earlier constraint fix for Broadwell CYCLE_ACTIVITY.*
forced umask 8 to counter 2. For this it used UEVENT,
to match the complete umask.
The event list for Broadwell has an additional
STALLS_L1D_PENDIND event that uses umask 8, but also
sets other bits in the umask. The earlier strict umask match
didn't handle this case.
Add a new UBIT_EVENT constraint macro that only matches
the specified bits in the umask. Then use that macro
to handle CYCLE_ACTIVITY.* on Broadwell.
The documented event also uses cmask, but there's no
need to let the event scheduler know about the cmask,
as the scheduling restriction is only tied to the umask.
[I'm resending the last patch. There were various
discussions around it, but no better solutions came
up. Also need a solution because it breaks various
tools, such as toplev]
Reported-by: Grant Ayers
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h | 4 ++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
index 953a0e4..285fce3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
@@ -317,6 +317,10 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
#define INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n) \
EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK)
+/* Constraint on specific umask bit only + event */
+#define INTEL_UBIT_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n) \
+ EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT|(c))
+
/* Like UEVENT_CONSTRAINT, but match flags too */
#define INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n) \
EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK|X86_ALL_EVENT_FLAGS)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 1d84b41..7ebc594 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ struct event_constraint intel_bdw_event_constraints[] = {
FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x003c, 1), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.CORE */
FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0300, 2), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF */
INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x148, 0x4), /* L1D_PEND_MISS.PENDING */
- INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x8a3, 0x4), /* CYCLE_ACTIVITY.CYCLES_L1D_MISS */
+ INTEL_UBIT_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x8a3, 0x4), /* CYCLE_ACTIVITY.CYCLES_L1D_MISS */
EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END
};
--
2.4.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86, perf: Handle multiple umask bits for BDW CYCLE_ACTIVITY.*
@ 2015-09-30 21:21 Stephane Eranian
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephane Eranian @ 2015-09-30 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML; +Cc: ak, Peter Zijlstra, mingo, Liang, Kan
Hi Andi,
> From: Andi Kleen <ak <at> linux.intel.com>
>
> The earlier constraint fix for Broadwell CYCLE_ACTIVITY.*
> forced umask 8 to counter 2. For this it used UEVENT,
> to match the complete umask.
>
> The event list for Broadwell has an additional
> CYC_ACT.STALLS_L1D_PENDIND event that uses umask 8, but also
> sets other bits in the umask. The earlier strict umask match
> didn't handle this case.
>
I think this patch is not quite fixing the issue. Personnally I think, this is a
bit overkill. If you use L1D_PENDING (umask 8, cmask=8), then the UEVENT
version will handle this correctly. IF you have a different cmask,
then this is not
a valid combination for CYCLE_ACTIVITY. In any case, I think the change below
should give you want you wanted:
> Add a new UBIT_EVENT constraint macro that only matches
> the specified bits in the umask. Then use that macro
> to handle CYCLE_ACTIVITY.* on Broadwell.
>
> Reported-by: Grant Ayers
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h | 4 ++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
> index 953a0e4..285fce3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
> struct cpu_hw_events {
> #define INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n) \
> EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK)
>
> +/* Constraint on specific umask bit only + event */
> +#define INTEL_UBIT_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n) \
> + EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT|(c))
> +
> /* Like UEVENT_CONSTRAINT, but match flags too */
> #define INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n) \
> EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK|X86_ALL_EVENT_FLAGS)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> index 1d84b41..7ebc594 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> struct event_constraint intel_bdw_event_constraints[] = {
> FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x003c, 1), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.CORE */
> FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0300, 2), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF */
> INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x148, 0x4), /* L1D_PEND_MISS.PENDING */
> - INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x8a3, 0x4), /* CYCLE_ACTIVITY.CYCLES_L1D_MISS */
> + INTEL_UBIT_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x8a3, 0x4), /* CYCLE_ACTIVITY.CYCLES_L1D_MISS */
I think here you want to pass 0x80008a3, so that the cmask is used in
the comparison in x86_get_event_constraints().
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-11-17 0:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-21 22:17 [PATCH] x86, perf: Handle multiple umask bits for BDW CYCLE_ACTIVITY.* Andi Kleen
2015-09-30 21:21 Stephane Eranian
2015-11-17 0:21 Andi Kleen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome