* [PATCH V4] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands
@ 2015-09-22 9:27 Jon Hunter
2015-09-23 21:42 ` Ulf Hansson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2015-09-22 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ulf Hansson
Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Grant Grundler, Olof Johansson, linux-mmc,
linux-kernel, Jon Hunter, Seshagiri Holi
Certain eMMC devices allow vendor specific device information to be read
via a sequence of vendor commands. These vendor commands must be issued
in sequence and an atomic fashion. One way to support this would be to
add an ioctl function for sending a sequence of commands to the device
atomically as proposed here. These multi commands are simple array of
the existing mmc_ioc_cmd structure.
The structure passed via the ioctl uses a __u64 type to specify the number
of commands (so that the structure is aligned on a 64-bit boundary) and a
zero length array as a header for list of commands to be issued. The
maximum number of commands that can be sent is determined by
MMC_IOC_MAX_CMDS (which defaults to 255 and should be more than
sufficient).
This based upon work by Seshagiri Holi <sholi@nvidia.com>.
Signed-off-by: Seshagiri Holi <sholi@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
---
V4 changes:
- Moved duplicated test in mmc_blk_ioc_cmd() and mmc_blk_ioc_multi_cmd()
to mmc_blk_ioctl(). Changed author.
V3 changes:
- Updated mmc_ioc_multi_cmd structure per Grant's preference
V2 changes:
- Updated changelog and patch per Arnd's feedback
- Moved mmc_put/get_card() outside of __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd()
drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 206 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
include/uapi/linux/mmc/ioctl.h | 19 +++-
2 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
index c742cfd7674e..f6acf0f6c410 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
@@ -387,6 +387,24 @@ out:
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
+static int mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_to_user(struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *ic_ptr,
+ struct mmc_blk_ioc_data *idata)
+{
+ struct mmc_ioc_cmd *ic = &idata->ic;
+
+ if (copy_to_user(&(ic_ptr->response), ic->response,
+ sizeof(ic->response)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ if (!idata->ic.write_flag) {
+ if (copy_to_user((void __user *)(unsigned long)ic->data_ptr,
+ idata->buf, idata->buf_bytes))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int ioctl_rpmb_card_status_poll(struct mmc_card *card, u32 *status,
u32 retries_max)
{
@@ -447,12 +465,9 @@ out:
return err;
}
-static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
- struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *ic_ptr)
+static int __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_blk_data *md,
+ struct mmc_blk_ioc_data *idata)
{
- struct mmc_blk_ioc_data *idata;
- struct mmc_blk_data *md;
- struct mmc_card *card;
struct mmc_command cmd = {0};
struct mmc_data data = {0};
struct mmc_request mrq = {NULL};
@@ -461,33 +476,12 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
int is_rpmb = false;
u32 status = 0;
- /*
- * The caller must have CAP_SYS_RAWIO, and must be calling this on the
- * whole block device, not on a partition. This prevents overspray
- * between sibling partitions.
- */
- if ((!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) || (bdev != bdev->bd_contains))
- return -EPERM;
-
- idata = mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_from_user(ic_ptr);
- if (IS_ERR(idata))
- return PTR_ERR(idata);
-
- md = mmc_blk_get(bdev->bd_disk);
- if (!md) {
- err = -EINVAL;
- goto cmd_err;
- }
+ if (!card || !md || !idata)
+ return -EINVAL;
if (md->area_type & MMC_BLK_DATA_AREA_RPMB)
is_rpmb = true;
- card = md->queue.card;
- if (IS_ERR(card)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(card);
- goto cmd_done;
- }
-
cmd.opcode = idata->ic.opcode;
cmd.arg = idata->ic.arg;
cmd.flags = idata->ic.flags;
@@ -530,23 +524,21 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
mrq.cmd = &cmd;
- mmc_get_card(card);
-
err = mmc_blk_part_switch(card, md);
if (err)
- goto cmd_rel_host;
+ return err;
if (idata->ic.is_acmd) {
err = mmc_app_cmd(card->host, card);
if (err)
- goto cmd_rel_host;
+ return err;
}
if (is_rpmb) {
err = mmc_set_blockcount(card, data.blocks,
idata->ic.write_flag & (1 << 31));
if (err)
- goto cmd_rel_host;
+ return err;
}
if ((MMC_EXTRACT_INDEX_FROM_ARG(cmd.arg) == EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START) &&
@@ -557,7 +549,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
pr_err("%s: ioctl_do_sanitize() failed. err = %d",
__func__, err);
- goto cmd_rel_host;
+ return err;
}
mmc_wait_for_req(card->host, &mrq);
@@ -565,14 +557,12 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
if (cmd.error) {
dev_err(mmc_dev(card->host), "%s: cmd error %d\n",
__func__, cmd.error);
- err = cmd.error;
- goto cmd_rel_host;
+ return cmd.error;
}
if (data.error) {
dev_err(mmc_dev(card->host), "%s: data error %d\n",
__func__, data.error);
- err = data.error;
- goto cmd_rel_host;
+ return data.error;
}
/*
@@ -582,18 +572,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
if (idata->ic.postsleep_min_us)
usleep_range(idata->ic.postsleep_min_us, idata->ic.postsleep_max_us);
- if (copy_to_user(&(ic_ptr->response), cmd.resp, sizeof(cmd.resp))) {
- err = -EFAULT;
- goto cmd_rel_host;
- }
-
- if (!idata->ic.write_flag) {
- if (copy_to_user((void __user *)(unsigned long) idata->ic.data_ptr,
- idata->buf, idata->buf_bytes)) {
- err = -EFAULT;
- goto cmd_rel_host;
- }
- }
+ memcpy(&(idata->ic.response), cmd.resp, sizeof(cmd.resp));
if (is_rpmb) {
/*
@@ -607,9 +586,42 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
__func__, status, err);
}
-cmd_rel_host:
+ return err;
+}
+
+static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
+ struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *ic_ptr)
+{
+ struct mmc_blk_ioc_data *idata;
+ struct mmc_blk_data *md;
+ struct mmc_card *card;
+ int err;
+
+ idata = mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_from_user(ic_ptr);
+ if (IS_ERR(idata))
+ return PTR_ERR(idata);
+
+ md = mmc_blk_get(bdev->bd_disk);
+ if (!md) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto cmd_err;
+ }
+
+ card = md->queue.card;
+ if (IS_ERR(card)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(card);
+ goto cmd_done;
+ }
+
+ mmc_get_card(card);
+
+ err = __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(card, md, idata);
+
mmc_put_card(card);
+ if (!err)
+ err = mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_to_user(ic_ptr, idata);
+
cmd_done:
mmc_blk_put(md);
cmd_err:
@@ -618,13 +630,97 @@ cmd_err:
return err;
}
+static int mmc_blk_ioctl_multi_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
+ struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd __user *user)
+{
+ struct mmc_blk_ioc_data **idata = NULL;
+ struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *cmds = user->cmds;
+ struct mmc_card *card;
+ struct mmc_blk_data *md;
+ int i, err = -EFAULT;
+ __u64 num_of_cmds;
+
+ if (copy_from_user(&num_of_cmds, &user->num_of_cmds,
+ sizeof(num_of_cmds)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ if (num_of_cmds > MMC_IOC_MAX_CMDS)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ idata = kcalloc(num_of_cmds, sizeof(*idata), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!idata)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_of_cmds; i++) {
+ idata[i] = mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_from_user(&cmds[i]);
+ if (IS_ERR(idata[i])) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(idata[i]);
+ num_of_cmds = i;
+ goto cmd_err;
+ }
+ }
+
+ md = mmc_blk_get(bdev->bd_disk);
+ if (!md)
+ goto cmd_err;
+
+ card = md->queue.card;
+ if (IS_ERR(card)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(card);
+ goto cmd_done;
+ }
+
+ mmc_get_card(card);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_of_cmds; i++) {
+ err = __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(card, md, idata[i]);
+ if (err) {
+ mmc_put_card(card);
+ goto cmd_done;
+ }
+ }
+
+ mmc_put_card(card);
+
+ /* copy to user if data and response */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_of_cmds; i++) {
+ err = mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_to_user(&cmds[i], idata[i]);
+ if (err)
+ break;
+ }
+
+cmd_done:
+ mmc_blk_put(md);
+cmd_err:
+ for (i = 0; i < num_of_cmds; i++) {
+ kfree(idata[i]->buf);
+ kfree(idata[i]);
+ }
+ kfree(idata);
+ return err;
+}
+
static int mmc_blk_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
{
- int ret = -EINVAL;
- if (cmd == MMC_IOC_CMD)
- ret = mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(bdev, (struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *)arg);
- return ret;
+ /*
+ * The caller must have CAP_SYS_RAWIO, and must be calling this on the
+ * whole block device, not on a partition. This prevents overspray
+ * between sibling partitions.
+ */
+ if ((!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) || (bdev != bdev->bd_contains))
+ return -EPERM;
+
+ switch (cmd) {
+ case MMC_IOC_CMD:
+ return mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(bdev,
+ (struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *)arg);
+ case MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD:
+ return mmc_blk_ioctl_multi_cmd(bdev,
+ (struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd __user *)arg);
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
}
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/mmc/ioctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/mmc/ioctl.h
index 1f5e68923929..7e385b83b9d8 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/mmc/ioctl.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/mmc/ioctl.h
@@ -45,8 +45,24 @@ struct mmc_ioc_cmd {
};
#define mmc_ioc_cmd_set_data(ic, ptr) ic.data_ptr = (__u64)(unsigned long) ptr
-#define MMC_IOC_CMD _IOWR(MMC_BLOCK_MAJOR, 0, struct mmc_ioc_cmd)
+/**
+ * struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd - multi command information
+ * @num_of_cmds: Number of commands to send. Must be equal to or less than
+ * MMC_IOC_MAX_CMDS.
+ * @cmds: Array of commands with length equal to 'num_of_cmds'
+ */
+struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd {
+ __u64 num_of_cmds;
+ struct mmc_ioc_cmd cmds[0];
+};
+#define MMC_IOC_CMD _IOWR(MMC_BLOCK_MAJOR, 0, struct mmc_ioc_cmd)
+/*
+ * MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD: Used to send an array of MMC commands described by
+ * the structure mmc_ioc_multi_cmd. The MMC driver will issue all
+ * commands in array in sequence to card.
+ */
+#define MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD _IOWR(MMC_BLOCK_MAJOR, 1, struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd)
/*
* Since this ioctl is only meant to enhance (and not replace) normal access
* to the mmc bus device, an upper data transfer limit of MMC_IOC_MAX_BYTES
@@ -54,4 +70,5 @@ struct mmc_ioc_cmd {
* block device operations.
*/
#define MMC_IOC_MAX_BYTES (512L * 256)
+#define MMC_IOC_MAX_CMDS 255
#endif /* LINUX_MMC_IOCTL_H */
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands
2015-09-22 9:27 [PATCH V4] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Jon Hunter
@ 2015-09-23 21:42 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-09-23 21:51 ` Grant Grundler
2015-09-23 22:06 ` Grant Grundler
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Hansson @ 2015-09-23 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Hunter
Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Grant Grundler, Olof Johansson, linux-mmc,
linux-kernel, Seshagiri Holi
On 22 September 2015 at 11:27, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> wrote:
> Certain eMMC devices allow vendor specific device information to be read
> via a sequence of vendor commands. These vendor commands must be issued
> in sequence and an atomic fashion. One way to support this would be to
> add an ioctl function for sending a sequence of commands to the device
> atomically as proposed here. These multi commands are simple array of
> the existing mmc_ioc_cmd structure.
>
> The structure passed via the ioctl uses a __u64 type to specify the number
> of commands (so that the structure is aligned on a 64-bit boundary) and a
> zero length array as a header for list of commands to be issued. The
> maximum number of commands that can be sent is determined by
> MMC_IOC_MAX_CMDS (which defaults to 255 and should be more than
> sufficient).
>
> This based upon work by Seshagiri Holi <sholi@nvidia.com>.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seshagiri Holi <sholi@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Thanks, applied for next!
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> V4 changes:
> - Moved duplicated test in mmc_blk_ioc_cmd() and mmc_blk_ioc_multi_cmd()
> to mmc_blk_ioctl(). Changed author.
> V3 changes:
> - Updated mmc_ioc_multi_cmd structure per Grant's preference
> V2 changes:
> - Updated changelog and patch per Arnd's feedback
> - Moved mmc_put/get_card() outside of __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd()
>
> drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 206 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> include/uapi/linux/mmc/ioctl.h | 19 +++-
> 2 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> index c742cfd7674e..f6acf0f6c410 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> @@ -387,6 +387,24 @@ out:
> return ERR_PTR(err);
> }
>
> +static int mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_to_user(struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *ic_ptr,
> + struct mmc_blk_ioc_data *idata)
> +{
> + struct mmc_ioc_cmd *ic = &idata->ic;
> +
> + if (copy_to_user(&(ic_ptr->response), ic->response,
> + sizeof(ic->response)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (!idata->ic.write_flag) {
> + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)(unsigned long)ic->data_ptr,
> + idata->buf, idata->buf_bytes))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int ioctl_rpmb_card_status_poll(struct mmc_card *card, u32 *status,
> u32 retries_max)
> {
> @@ -447,12 +465,9 @@ out:
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
> - struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *ic_ptr)
> +static int __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_blk_data *md,
> + struct mmc_blk_ioc_data *idata)
> {
> - struct mmc_blk_ioc_data *idata;
> - struct mmc_blk_data *md;
> - struct mmc_card *card;
> struct mmc_command cmd = {0};
> struct mmc_data data = {0};
> struct mmc_request mrq = {NULL};
> @@ -461,33 +476,12 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
> int is_rpmb = false;
> u32 status = 0;
>
> - /*
> - * The caller must have CAP_SYS_RAWIO, and must be calling this on the
> - * whole block device, not on a partition. This prevents overspray
> - * between sibling partitions.
> - */
> - if ((!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) || (bdev != bdev->bd_contains))
> - return -EPERM;
> -
> - idata = mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_from_user(ic_ptr);
> - if (IS_ERR(idata))
> - return PTR_ERR(idata);
> -
> - md = mmc_blk_get(bdev->bd_disk);
> - if (!md) {
> - err = -EINVAL;
> - goto cmd_err;
> - }
> + if (!card || !md || !idata)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> if (md->area_type & MMC_BLK_DATA_AREA_RPMB)
> is_rpmb = true;
>
> - card = md->queue.card;
> - if (IS_ERR(card)) {
> - err = PTR_ERR(card);
> - goto cmd_done;
> - }
> -
> cmd.opcode = idata->ic.opcode;
> cmd.arg = idata->ic.arg;
> cmd.flags = idata->ic.flags;
> @@ -530,23 +524,21 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
>
> mrq.cmd = &cmd;
>
> - mmc_get_card(card);
> -
> err = mmc_blk_part_switch(card, md);
> if (err)
> - goto cmd_rel_host;
> + return err;
>
> if (idata->ic.is_acmd) {
> err = mmc_app_cmd(card->host, card);
> if (err)
> - goto cmd_rel_host;
> + return err;
> }
>
> if (is_rpmb) {
> err = mmc_set_blockcount(card, data.blocks,
> idata->ic.write_flag & (1 << 31));
> if (err)
> - goto cmd_rel_host;
> + return err;
> }
>
> if ((MMC_EXTRACT_INDEX_FROM_ARG(cmd.arg) == EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START) &&
> @@ -557,7 +549,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
> pr_err("%s: ioctl_do_sanitize() failed. err = %d",
> __func__, err);
>
> - goto cmd_rel_host;
> + return err;
> }
>
> mmc_wait_for_req(card->host, &mrq);
> @@ -565,14 +557,12 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
> if (cmd.error) {
> dev_err(mmc_dev(card->host), "%s: cmd error %d\n",
> __func__, cmd.error);
> - err = cmd.error;
> - goto cmd_rel_host;
> + return cmd.error;
> }
> if (data.error) {
> dev_err(mmc_dev(card->host), "%s: data error %d\n",
> __func__, data.error);
> - err = data.error;
> - goto cmd_rel_host;
> + return data.error;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -582,18 +572,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
> if (idata->ic.postsleep_min_us)
> usleep_range(idata->ic.postsleep_min_us, idata->ic.postsleep_max_us);
>
> - if (copy_to_user(&(ic_ptr->response), cmd.resp, sizeof(cmd.resp))) {
> - err = -EFAULT;
> - goto cmd_rel_host;
> - }
> -
> - if (!idata->ic.write_flag) {
> - if (copy_to_user((void __user *)(unsigned long) idata->ic.data_ptr,
> - idata->buf, idata->buf_bytes)) {
> - err = -EFAULT;
> - goto cmd_rel_host;
> - }
> - }
> + memcpy(&(idata->ic.response), cmd.resp, sizeof(cmd.resp));
>
> if (is_rpmb) {
> /*
> @@ -607,9 +586,42 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
> __func__, status, err);
> }
>
> -cmd_rel_host:
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
> + struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *ic_ptr)
> +{
> + struct mmc_blk_ioc_data *idata;
> + struct mmc_blk_data *md;
> + struct mmc_card *card;
> + int err;
> +
> + idata = mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_from_user(ic_ptr);
> + if (IS_ERR(idata))
> + return PTR_ERR(idata);
> +
> + md = mmc_blk_get(bdev->bd_disk);
> + if (!md) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto cmd_err;
> + }
> +
> + card = md->queue.card;
> + if (IS_ERR(card)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(card);
> + goto cmd_done;
> + }
> +
> + mmc_get_card(card);
> +
> + err = __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(card, md, idata);
> +
> mmc_put_card(card);
>
> + if (!err)
> + err = mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_to_user(ic_ptr, idata);
> +
> cmd_done:
> mmc_blk_put(md);
> cmd_err:
> @@ -618,13 +630,97 @@ cmd_err:
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int mmc_blk_ioctl_multi_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
> + struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd __user *user)
> +{
> + struct mmc_blk_ioc_data **idata = NULL;
> + struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *cmds = user->cmds;
> + struct mmc_card *card;
> + struct mmc_blk_data *md;
> + int i, err = -EFAULT;
> + __u64 num_of_cmds;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&num_of_cmds, &user->num_of_cmds,
> + sizeof(num_of_cmds)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (num_of_cmds > MMC_IOC_MAX_CMDS)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + idata = kcalloc(num_of_cmds, sizeof(*idata), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!idata)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_of_cmds; i++) {
> + idata[i] = mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_from_user(&cmds[i]);
> + if (IS_ERR(idata[i])) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(idata[i]);
> + num_of_cmds = i;
> + goto cmd_err;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + md = mmc_blk_get(bdev->bd_disk);
> + if (!md)
> + goto cmd_err;
> +
> + card = md->queue.card;
> + if (IS_ERR(card)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(card);
> + goto cmd_done;
> + }
> +
> + mmc_get_card(card);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_of_cmds; i++) {
> + err = __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(card, md, idata[i]);
> + if (err) {
> + mmc_put_card(card);
> + goto cmd_done;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + mmc_put_card(card);
> +
> + /* copy to user if data and response */
> + for (i = 0; i < num_of_cmds; i++) {
> + err = mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_to_user(&cmds[i], idata[i]);
> + if (err)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> +cmd_done:
> + mmc_blk_put(md);
> +cmd_err:
> + for (i = 0; i < num_of_cmds; i++) {
> + kfree(idata[i]->buf);
> + kfree(idata[i]);
> + }
> + kfree(idata);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int mmc_blk_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
> unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> {
> - int ret = -EINVAL;
> - if (cmd == MMC_IOC_CMD)
> - ret = mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(bdev, (struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *)arg);
> - return ret;
> + /*
> + * The caller must have CAP_SYS_RAWIO, and must be calling this on the
> + * whole block device, not on a partition. This prevents overspray
> + * between sibling partitions.
> + */
> + if ((!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) || (bdev != bdev->bd_contains))
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + switch (cmd) {
> + case MMC_IOC_CMD:
> + return mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(bdev,
> + (struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *)arg);
> + case MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD:
> + return mmc_blk_ioctl_multi_cmd(bdev,
> + (struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd __user *)arg);
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/mmc/ioctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/mmc/ioctl.h
> index 1f5e68923929..7e385b83b9d8 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/mmc/ioctl.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/mmc/ioctl.h
> @@ -45,8 +45,24 @@ struct mmc_ioc_cmd {
> };
> #define mmc_ioc_cmd_set_data(ic, ptr) ic.data_ptr = (__u64)(unsigned long) ptr
>
> -#define MMC_IOC_CMD _IOWR(MMC_BLOCK_MAJOR, 0, struct mmc_ioc_cmd)
> +/**
> + * struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd - multi command information
> + * @num_of_cmds: Number of commands to send. Must be equal to or less than
> + * MMC_IOC_MAX_CMDS.
> + * @cmds: Array of commands with length equal to 'num_of_cmds'
> + */
> +struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd {
> + __u64 num_of_cmds;
> + struct mmc_ioc_cmd cmds[0];
> +};
>
> +#define MMC_IOC_CMD _IOWR(MMC_BLOCK_MAJOR, 0, struct mmc_ioc_cmd)
> +/*
> + * MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD: Used to send an array of MMC commands described by
> + * the structure mmc_ioc_multi_cmd. The MMC driver will issue all
> + * commands in array in sequence to card.
> + */
> +#define MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD _IOWR(MMC_BLOCK_MAJOR, 1, struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd)
> /*
> * Since this ioctl is only meant to enhance (and not replace) normal access
> * to the mmc bus device, an upper data transfer limit of MMC_IOC_MAX_BYTES
> @@ -54,4 +70,5 @@ struct mmc_ioc_cmd {
> * block device operations.
> */
> #define MMC_IOC_MAX_BYTES (512L * 256)
> +#define MMC_IOC_MAX_CMDS 255
> #endif /* LINUX_MMC_IOCTL_H */
> --
> 2.1.4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands
2015-09-23 21:42 ` Ulf Hansson
@ 2015-09-23 21:51 ` Grant Grundler
2015-09-23 22:06 ` Grant Grundler
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Grant Grundler @ 2015-09-23 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ulf Hansson
Cc: Jon Hunter, Arnd Bergmann, Olof Johansson, linux-mmc,
linux-kernel, Seshagiri Holi
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 22 September 2015 at 11:27, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> wrote:
>> Certain eMMC devices allow vendor specific device information to be read
>> via a sequence of vendor commands. These vendor commands must be issued
>> in sequence and an atomic fashion. One way to support this would be to
>> add an ioctl function for sending a sequence of commands to the device
>> atomically as proposed here. These multi commands are simple array of
>> the existing mmc_ioc_cmd structure.
>>
>> The structure passed via the ioctl uses a __u64 type to specify the number
>> of commands (so that the structure is aligned on a 64-bit boundary) and a
>> zero length array as a header for list of commands to be issued. The
>> maximum number of commands that can be sent is determined by
>> MMC_IOC_MAX_CMDS (which defaults to 255 and should be more than
>> sufficient).
>>
>> This based upon work by Seshagiri Holi <sholi@nvidia.com>.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Seshagiri Holi <sholi@nvidia.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>
> Thanks, applied for next!
Awesome! Thanks Ulf! (and Jon for preparing the patches)
I'll prepare a patch to implement Gwendal's previous suggestion based
on this 3.18 patch:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/299956/
cheers,
grant
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
>> ---
>> V4 changes:
>> - Moved duplicated test in mmc_blk_ioc_cmd() and mmc_blk_ioc_multi_cmd()
>> to mmc_blk_ioctl(). Changed author.
>> V3 changes:
>> - Updated mmc_ioc_multi_cmd structure per Grant's preference
>> V2 changes:
>> - Updated changelog and patch per Arnd's feedback
>> - Moved mmc_put/get_card() outside of __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd()
>>
>> drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 206 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> include/uapi/linux/mmc/ioctl.h | 19 +++-
>> 2 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
>> index c742cfd7674e..f6acf0f6c410 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
>> @@ -387,6 +387,24 @@ out:
>> return ERR_PTR(err);
>> }
>>
>> +static int mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_to_user(struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *ic_ptr,
>> + struct mmc_blk_ioc_data *idata)
>> +{
>> + struct mmc_ioc_cmd *ic = &idata->ic;
>> +
>> + if (copy_to_user(&(ic_ptr->response), ic->response,
>> + sizeof(ic->response)))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> + if (!idata->ic.write_flag) {
>> + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)(unsigned long)ic->data_ptr,
>> + idata->buf, idata->buf_bytes))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int ioctl_rpmb_card_status_poll(struct mmc_card *card, u32 *status,
>> u32 retries_max)
>> {
>> @@ -447,12 +465,9 @@ out:
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> -static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
>> - struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *ic_ptr)
>> +static int __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_blk_data *md,
>> + struct mmc_blk_ioc_data *idata)
>> {
>> - struct mmc_blk_ioc_data *idata;
>> - struct mmc_blk_data *md;
>> - struct mmc_card *card;
>> struct mmc_command cmd = {0};
>> struct mmc_data data = {0};
>> struct mmc_request mrq = {NULL};
>> @@ -461,33 +476,12 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
>> int is_rpmb = false;
>> u32 status = 0;
>>
>> - /*
>> - * The caller must have CAP_SYS_RAWIO, and must be calling this on the
>> - * whole block device, not on a partition. This prevents overspray
>> - * between sibling partitions.
>> - */
>> - if ((!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) || (bdev != bdev->bd_contains))
>> - return -EPERM;
>> -
>> - idata = mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_from_user(ic_ptr);
>> - if (IS_ERR(idata))
>> - return PTR_ERR(idata);
>> -
>> - md = mmc_blk_get(bdev->bd_disk);
>> - if (!md) {
>> - err = -EINVAL;
>> - goto cmd_err;
>> - }
>> + if (!card || !md || !idata)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>>
>> if (md->area_type & MMC_BLK_DATA_AREA_RPMB)
>> is_rpmb = true;
>>
>> - card = md->queue.card;
>> - if (IS_ERR(card)) {
>> - err = PTR_ERR(card);
>> - goto cmd_done;
>> - }
>> -
>> cmd.opcode = idata->ic.opcode;
>> cmd.arg = idata->ic.arg;
>> cmd.flags = idata->ic.flags;
>> @@ -530,23 +524,21 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
>>
>> mrq.cmd = &cmd;
>>
>> - mmc_get_card(card);
>> -
>> err = mmc_blk_part_switch(card, md);
>> if (err)
>> - goto cmd_rel_host;
>> + return err;
>>
>> if (idata->ic.is_acmd) {
>> err = mmc_app_cmd(card->host, card);
>> if (err)
>> - goto cmd_rel_host;
>> + return err;
>> }
>>
>> if (is_rpmb) {
>> err = mmc_set_blockcount(card, data.blocks,
>> idata->ic.write_flag & (1 << 31));
>> if (err)
>> - goto cmd_rel_host;
>> + return err;
>> }
>>
>> if ((MMC_EXTRACT_INDEX_FROM_ARG(cmd.arg) == EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START) &&
>> @@ -557,7 +549,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
>> pr_err("%s: ioctl_do_sanitize() failed. err = %d",
>> __func__, err);
>>
>> - goto cmd_rel_host;
>> + return err;
>> }
>>
>> mmc_wait_for_req(card->host, &mrq);
>> @@ -565,14 +557,12 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
>> if (cmd.error) {
>> dev_err(mmc_dev(card->host), "%s: cmd error %d\n",
>> __func__, cmd.error);
>> - err = cmd.error;
>> - goto cmd_rel_host;
>> + return cmd.error;
>> }
>> if (data.error) {
>> dev_err(mmc_dev(card->host), "%s: data error %d\n",
>> __func__, data.error);
>> - err = data.error;
>> - goto cmd_rel_host;
>> + return data.error;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -582,18 +572,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
>> if (idata->ic.postsleep_min_us)
>> usleep_range(idata->ic.postsleep_min_us, idata->ic.postsleep_max_us);
>>
>> - if (copy_to_user(&(ic_ptr->response), cmd.resp, sizeof(cmd.resp))) {
>> - err = -EFAULT;
>> - goto cmd_rel_host;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (!idata->ic.write_flag) {
>> - if (copy_to_user((void __user *)(unsigned long) idata->ic.data_ptr,
>> - idata->buf, idata->buf_bytes)) {
>> - err = -EFAULT;
>> - goto cmd_rel_host;
>> - }
>> - }
>> + memcpy(&(idata->ic.response), cmd.resp, sizeof(cmd.resp));
>>
>> if (is_rpmb) {
>> /*
>> @@ -607,9 +586,42 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
>> __func__, status, err);
>> }
>>
>> -cmd_rel_host:
>> + return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
>> + struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *ic_ptr)
>> +{
>> + struct mmc_blk_ioc_data *idata;
>> + struct mmc_blk_data *md;
>> + struct mmc_card *card;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + idata = mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_from_user(ic_ptr);
>> + if (IS_ERR(idata))
>> + return PTR_ERR(idata);
>> +
>> + md = mmc_blk_get(bdev->bd_disk);
>> + if (!md) {
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + goto cmd_err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + card = md->queue.card;
>> + if (IS_ERR(card)) {
>> + err = PTR_ERR(card);
>> + goto cmd_done;
>> + }
>> +
>> + mmc_get_card(card);
>> +
>> + err = __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(card, md, idata);
>> +
>> mmc_put_card(card);
>>
>> + if (!err)
>> + err = mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_to_user(ic_ptr, idata);
>> +
>> cmd_done:
>> mmc_blk_put(md);
>> cmd_err:
>> @@ -618,13 +630,97 @@ cmd_err:
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> +static int mmc_blk_ioctl_multi_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
>> + struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd __user *user)
>> +{
>> + struct mmc_blk_ioc_data **idata = NULL;
>> + struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *cmds = user->cmds;
>> + struct mmc_card *card;
>> + struct mmc_blk_data *md;
>> + int i, err = -EFAULT;
>> + __u64 num_of_cmds;
>> +
>> + if (copy_from_user(&num_of_cmds, &user->num_of_cmds,
>> + sizeof(num_of_cmds)))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> + if (num_of_cmds > MMC_IOC_MAX_CMDS)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + idata = kcalloc(num_of_cmds, sizeof(*idata), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!idata)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_of_cmds; i++) {
>> + idata[i] = mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_from_user(&cmds[i]);
>> + if (IS_ERR(idata[i])) {
>> + err = PTR_ERR(idata[i]);
>> + num_of_cmds = i;
>> + goto cmd_err;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + md = mmc_blk_get(bdev->bd_disk);
>> + if (!md)
>> + goto cmd_err;
>> +
>> + card = md->queue.card;
>> + if (IS_ERR(card)) {
>> + err = PTR_ERR(card);
>> + goto cmd_done;
>> + }
>> +
>> + mmc_get_card(card);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_of_cmds; i++) {
>> + err = __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(card, md, idata[i]);
>> + if (err) {
>> + mmc_put_card(card);
>> + goto cmd_done;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + mmc_put_card(card);
>> +
>> + /* copy to user if data and response */
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_of_cmds; i++) {
>> + err = mmc_blk_ioctl_copy_to_user(&cmds[i], idata[i]);
>> + if (err)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> +cmd_done:
>> + mmc_blk_put(md);
>> +cmd_err:
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_of_cmds; i++) {
>> + kfree(idata[i]->buf);
>> + kfree(idata[i]);
>> + }
>> + kfree(idata);
>> + return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int mmc_blk_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>> unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>> {
>> - int ret = -EINVAL;
>> - if (cmd == MMC_IOC_CMD)
>> - ret = mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(bdev, (struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *)arg);
>> - return ret;
>> + /*
>> + * The caller must have CAP_SYS_RAWIO, and must be calling this on the
>> + * whole block device, not on a partition. This prevents overspray
>> + * between sibling partitions.
>> + */
>> + if ((!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) || (bdev != bdev->bd_contains))
>> + return -EPERM;
>> +
>> + switch (cmd) {
>> + case MMC_IOC_CMD:
>> + return mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(bdev,
>> + (struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *)arg);
>> + case MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD:
>> + return mmc_blk_ioctl_multi_cmd(bdev,
>> + (struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd __user *)arg);
>> + default:
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/mmc/ioctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/mmc/ioctl.h
>> index 1f5e68923929..7e385b83b9d8 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/mmc/ioctl.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/mmc/ioctl.h
>> @@ -45,8 +45,24 @@ struct mmc_ioc_cmd {
>> };
>> #define mmc_ioc_cmd_set_data(ic, ptr) ic.data_ptr = (__u64)(unsigned long) ptr
>>
>> -#define MMC_IOC_CMD _IOWR(MMC_BLOCK_MAJOR, 0, struct mmc_ioc_cmd)
>> +/**
>> + * struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd - multi command information
>> + * @num_of_cmds: Number of commands to send. Must be equal to or less than
>> + * MMC_IOC_MAX_CMDS.
>> + * @cmds: Array of commands with length equal to 'num_of_cmds'
>> + */
>> +struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd {
>> + __u64 num_of_cmds;
>> + struct mmc_ioc_cmd cmds[0];
>> +};
>>
>> +#define MMC_IOC_CMD _IOWR(MMC_BLOCK_MAJOR, 0, struct mmc_ioc_cmd)
>> +/*
>> + * MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD: Used to send an array of MMC commands described by
>> + * the structure mmc_ioc_multi_cmd. The MMC driver will issue all
>> + * commands in array in sequence to card.
>> + */
>> +#define MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD _IOWR(MMC_BLOCK_MAJOR, 1, struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd)
>> /*
>> * Since this ioctl is only meant to enhance (and not replace) normal access
>> * to the mmc bus device, an upper data transfer limit of MMC_IOC_MAX_BYTES
>> @@ -54,4 +70,5 @@ struct mmc_ioc_cmd {
>> * block device operations.
>> */
>> #define MMC_IOC_MAX_BYTES (512L * 256)
>> +#define MMC_IOC_MAX_CMDS 255
>> #endif /* LINUX_MMC_IOCTL_H */
>> --
>> 2.1.4
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands
2015-09-23 21:42 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-09-23 21:51 ` Grant Grundler
@ 2015-09-23 22:06 ` Grant Grundler
2015-09-23 22:26 ` Ulf Hansson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Grant Grundler @ 2015-09-23 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ulf Hansson
Cc: Jon Hunter, Arnd Bergmann, Olof Johansson, linux-mmc,
linux-kernel, Seshagiri Holi
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 22 September 2015 at 11:27, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> wrote:
>> Certain eMMC devices allow vendor specific device information to be read
>> via a sequence of vendor commands. These vendor commands must be issued
>> in sequence and an atomic fashion. One way to support this would be to
>> add an ioctl function for sending a sequence of commands to the device
>> atomically as proposed here. These multi commands are simple array of
>> the existing mmc_ioc_cmd structure.
>>
>> The structure passed via the ioctl uses a __u64 type to specify the number
>> of commands (so that the structure is aligned on a 64-bit boundary) and a
>> zero length array as a header for list of commands to be issued. The
>> maximum number of commands that can be sent is determined by
>> MMC_IOC_MAX_CMDS (which defaults to 255 and should be more than
>> sufficient).
>>
>> This based upon work by Seshagiri Holi <sholi@nvidia.com>.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Seshagiri Holi <sholi@nvidia.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>
> Thanks, applied for next!
Ulf,
is the git repo visible publicly?
Your linaro.org mmc.git seems to be stale and Chris Ball's tree on
kernel.org is the only other mention of mmc I'm finding.
cheers
grant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands
2015-09-23 22:06 ` Grant Grundler
@ 2015-09-23 22:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-09-23 23:42 ` Grant Grundler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Hansson @ 2015-09-23 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Grundler
Cc: Jon Hunter, Arnd Bergmann, Olof Johansson, linux-mmc,
linux-kernel, Seshagiri Holi
On 24 September 2015 at 00:06, Grant Grundler <grundler@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 22 September 2015 at 11:27, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>> Certain eMMC devices allow vendor specific device information to be read
>>> via a sequence of vendor commands. These vendor commands must be issued
>>> in sequence and an atomic fashion. One way to support this would be to
>>> add an ioctl function for sending a sequence of commands to the device
>>> atomically as proposed here. These multi commands are simple array of
>>> the existing mmc_ioc_cmd structure.
>>>
>>> The structure passed via the ioctl uses a __u64 type to specify the number
>>> of commands (so that the structure is aligned on a 64-bit boundary) and a
>>> zero length array as a header for list of commands to be issued. The
>>> maximum number of commands that can be sent is determined by
>>> MMC_IOC_MAX_CMDS (which defaults to 255 and should be more than
>>> sufficient).
>>>
>>> This based upon work by Seshagiri Holi <sholi@nvidia.com>.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Seshagiri Holi <sholi@nvidia.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>>
>> Thanks, applied for next!
>
> Ulf,
> is the git repo visible publicly?
git://git.linaro.org/people/ulf.hansson/mmc.git
>
> Your linaro.org mmc.git seems to be stale and Chris Ball's tree on
> kernel.org is the only other mention of mmc I'm finding.
Chris' tree hasn't been used for a long time.
>
> cheers
> grant
Kind regards
Uffe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands
2015-09-23 22:26 ` Ulf Hansson
@ 2015-09-23 23:42 ` Grant Grundler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Grant Grundler @ 2015-09-23 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ulf Hansson
Cc: Jon Hunter, Arnd Bergmann, Olof Johansson, linux-mmc,
linux-kernel, Seshagiri Holi
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
...
>> Ulf,
>> is the git repo visible publicly?
>
> git://git.linaro.org/people/ulf.hansson/mmc.git
Sorry - my bad : I had looked at mmc.git and saw "2014-10-15" as the
last commit.
Scrolling down to the bottom of the page shows the "next" branch as
active. I'll work from that branch. :)
thanks!
grant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-23 23:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-22 9:27 [PATCH V4] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Jon Hunter
2015-09-23 21:42 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-09-23 21:51 ` Grant Grundler
2015-09-23 22:06 ` Grant Grundler
2015-09-23 22:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-09-23 23:42 ` Grant Grundler
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome