mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
To: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Cc: Mark yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] drm: Introduce generic probe function for component based masters.
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 12:20:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1447068036.3964.18.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151109105316.GD963@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

Am Montag, den 09.11.2015, 10:53 +0000 schrieb Liviu Dudau:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 05:39:25PM +0800, Mark yao wrote:
> > On 2015年10月19日 23:07, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > >A lot of component based DRM drivers use a variant of the same code
> > >as the probe function. They bind the crtc ports in the first iteration
> > >and then scan through the child nodes and bind the encoders attached
> > >to the remote endpoints. Factor the common code into a separate
> > >function called drm_of_component_probe() in order to increase code
> > >reuse.
> > >
> > >Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
> > >Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
> > >---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/drm/drm_of.h     | 13 +++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 101 insertions(+)
> > >
> > >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> > >index be38840..493c05c 100644
> > >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> > >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> > >@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> > >+#include <linux/component.h>
> > >  #include <linux/export.h>
> > >  #include <linux/list.h>
> > >  #include <linux/of_graph.h>
> > >@@ -61,3 +62,90 @@ uint32_t drm_of_find_possible_crtcs(struct drm_device *dev,
> > >  	return possible_crtcs;
> > >  }
> > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_of_find_possible_crtcs);
> > >+
> > >+/**
> > >+ * drm_of_component_probe - Generic probe function for a component based master
> > >+ * @dev: master device containing the OF node
> > >+ * @compare_of: compare function used for matching components
> > >+ * @master_ops: component master ops to be used
> > >+ *
> > >+ * Parse the platform device OF node and bind all the components associated
> > >+ * with the master. Interface ports are added before the encoders in order to
> > >+ * satisfy their .bind requirements
> > >+ * See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt for the bindings.
> > >+ *
> > >+ * Returns zero if successful, or one of the standard error codes if it fails.
> > >+ */
> > >+int drm_of_component_probe(struct device *dev,
> > >+			   int (*compare_of)(struct device *, void *),
> > >+			   const struct component_master_ops *m_ops)
> > >+{
> > >+	struct device_node *ep, *port, *remote;
> > >+	struct component_match *match = NULL;
> > >+	int i;
> > >+
> > >+	if (!dev->of_node)
> > >+		return -EINVAL;
> > >+
> > >+	/*
> > >+	 * Bind the crtc's ports first, so that drm_of_find_possible_crtcs()
> > >+	 * called from encoder's .bind callbacks works as expected
> > >+	 */
> > >+	for (i = 0; ; i++) {
> > >+		port = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "ports", i);
> > >+		if (!port)
> > >+			break;
> > >+
> > >+		if (!of_device_is_available(port->parent)) {
> > >+			of_node_put(port);
> > >+			continue;
> > >+		}
> > >+
> > >+		component_match_add(dev, &match, compare_of, port);
> > Hi Liviu
> >       Rockchip drm can't work with drm_of_component_probe function now,
> > 
> >       At drm_of_component_probe:
> >             component_match_add(dev, &match, compare_of, port);
> >       And original rockchip drm use:
> >             component_match_add(dev, &match, compare_of, port->parent);
> > 
> >      That different "port" and "port->parent" cause crtc device node always
> > mis-match.
> > 
> >      I'm confused that rockchip use same dts node map as imx drm driver, but
> > it works
> > for imx drm, not work on rockchip drm.
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> I'm (slightly) confused as well. The drivers are different so there must be a reason
> to account for the different behaviour. Unfortunately I don't have a Rockchip based
> platform ready for testing, so I would appreciate if you could add some debugging
> messages to drm_of_component_probe() when component_match_add is being called and
> compare that with the version before my patch.

The reason is that rockchip has device tree probed devices that contain
the ports, but on imx crtc devices are platform devices created by the
driver, which don't have their own device tree node. They are associated
with the port nodes directly in ipu_drm_probe (ipuv3-crtc.c).

regards
Philipp


  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-09 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-19 15:07 [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] drm: Cleanup " Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] drm: Introduce generic " Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:14   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-20  9:45   ` Eric Anholt
2015-11-09  9:39   ` Mark yao
2015-11-09 10:53     ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-09 11:20       ` Philipp Zabel [this message]
2015-11-09 11:43     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-09 11:57       ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-09 12:03         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-09 12:07           ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-09 19:49             ` Heiko Stuebner
     [not found]         ` <5641B075.6020602@rock-chips.com>
2015-11-10 10:09           ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-09 11:15   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-19 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] drm/imx: Convert the probe function to the generic drm_of_component_probe() Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:15   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-19 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] drm/rockchip: " Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] drm/armada: " Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:17   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-19 15:23     ` Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 22:07   ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1447068036.3964.18.camel@pengutronix.de \
    --to=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.yao@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®