From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] drm/armada: Convert the probe function to the generic drm_of_component_probe()
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:17:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151019151714.GI32532@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445267270-23126-5-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:07:50PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> The armada DRM driver keeps some old platform data compatibility in the
> probe function that makes moving to the generic drm_of_component_probe()
> a bit more complicated that it should. Refactor the probe function to do
> the platform_data processing after the generic probe (and only if that
> fails). This way future cleanup can further remove support for it.
I'm mainly using the old code, even with DT based platforms, because it
needs a block of reserved memory which I haven't got around to converting
to DT stuff (each time I've looked into doing that, bits for dealing with
reserved memory nodes were missing.)
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-19 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-19 15:07 [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] drm: Cleanup probe function for component based masters Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] drm: Introduce generic " Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-20 9:45 ` Eric Anholt
2015-11-09 9:39 ` Mark yao
2015-11-09 10:53 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-09 11:20 ` Philipp Zabel
2015-11-09 11:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-09 11:57 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-09 12:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-09 12:07 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-09 19:49 ` Heiko Stuebner
[not found] ` <5641B075.6020602@rock-chips.com>
2015-11-10 10:09 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-09 11:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-19 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] drm/imx: Convert the probe function to the generic drm_of_component_probe() Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-19 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] drm/rockchip: " Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] drm/armada: " Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-10-19 15:23 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 22:07 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151019151714.GI32532@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.yao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®