mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/9] stm class: Fix locking in unbinding policy path
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 17:25:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450797923-23072-5-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450797923-23072-1-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>

Right now, if stm device removal has to unbind from a policy (that is,
an stm device that has STP policy, gets removed), it will trigger a
nested lock on the stm device's policy mutex.

This patch fixes the problem by moving the locking from the policy
unbinding to policy removal (configfs path), where it's actually needed;
the other caller of the policy unbinding function already takes the
mutex around the call.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c
index 11ab6d01ad..94d3abfb73 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c
@@ -272,13 +272,17 @@ void stp_policy_unbind(struct stp_policy *policy)
 {
 	struct stm_device *stm = policy->stm;
 
+	/*
+	 * stp_policy_release() will not call here if the policy is already
+	 * unbound; other users should not either, as no link exists between
+	 * this policy and anything else in that case
+	 */
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!policy->stm))
 		return;
 
-	mutex_lock(&stm->policy_mutex);
-	stm->policy = NULL;
-	mutex_unlock(&stm->policy_mutex);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&stm->policy_mutex);
 
+	stm->policy = NULL;
 	policy->stm = NULL;
 
 	stm_put_device(stm);
@@ -287,8 +291,16 @@ void stp_policy_unbind(struct stp_policy *policy)
 static void stp_policy_release(struct config_item *item)
 {
 	struct stp_policy *policy = to_stp_policy(item);
+	struct stm_device *stm = policy->stm;
 
+	/* a policy *can* be unbound and still exist in configfs tree */
+	if (!stm)
+		return;
+
+	mutex_lock(&stm->policy_mutex);
 	stp_policy_unbind(policy);
+	mutex_unlock(&stm->policy_mutex);
+
 	kfree(policy);
 }
 
-- 
2.6.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-22 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-22 15:25 [PATCH v3 0/9] stm/intel_th: Updates for 4.4 Alexander Shishkin
2015-12-22 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] stm class: Hide STM-specific options if STM is disabled Alexander Shishkin
2015-12-22 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] intel_th: INTEL_TH should depend on HAS_DMA Alexander Shishkin
2015-12-22 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] stm class: Select CONFIG_SRCU Alexander Shishkin
2015-12-22 15:25 ` Alexander Shishkin [this message]
2015-12-22 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] stm class: Fix link list locking Alexander Shishkin
2015-12-22 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] stm class: Fix an off-by-one in master array allocation Alexander Shishkin
2015-12-22 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] stm class: Prevent user-controllable allocations Alexander Shishkin
2015-12-22 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] intel_th: pci: Add Apollo Lake SOC support Alexander Shishkin
2015-12-22 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] intel_th: pci: Add Broxton " Alexander Shishkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1450797923-23072-5-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --to=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®