From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ktkhai@parallels.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, juri.lelli@gmail.com,
pang.xunlei@linaro.org, oleg@redhat.com,
wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH for v3.14.58 2/7] sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:16:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1451985388-19492-2-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451985388-19492-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Generalize the post_schedule() stuff into a balance callback list.
This allows us to more easily use it outside of schedule() and cross
sched_class.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124742.424032725@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Conflicts:
kernel/sched/core.c
kernel/sched/deadline.c
kernel/sched/rt.c
kernel/sched/sched.h
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
kernel/sched/rt.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index bbe9577..cc1be56 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2179,18 +2179,30 @@ static inline void pre_schedule(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
}
/* rq->lock is NOT held, but preemption is disabled */
-static inline void post_schedule(struct rq *rq)
+static void __balance_callback(struct rq *rq)
{
- if (rq->post_schedule) {
- unsigned long flags;
+ struct callback_head *head, *next;
+ void (*func)(struct rq *rq);
+ unsigned long flags;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
- if (rq->curr->sched_class->post_schedule)
- rq->curr->sched_class->post_schedule(rq);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
+ head = rq->balance_callback;
+ rq->balance_callback = NULL;
+ while (head) {
+ func = (void (*)(struct rq *))head->func;
+ next = head->next;
+ head->next = NULL;
+ head = next;
- rq->post_schedule = 0;
+ func(rq);
}
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
+}
+
+static inline void balance_callback(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ if (unlikely(rq->balance_callback))
+ __balance_callback(rq);
}
#else
@@ -2199,7 +2211,7 @@ static inline void pre_schedule(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
}
-static inline void post_schedule(struct rq *rq)
+static inline void balance_callback(struct rq *rq)
{
}
@@ -2220,7 +2232,7 @@ asmlinkage void schedule_tail(struct task_struct *prev)
* FIXME: do we need to worry about rq being invalidated by the
* task_switch?
*/
- post_schedule(rq);
+ balance_callback(rq);
#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW
/* In this case, finish_task_switch does not reenable preemption */
@@ -2732,7 +2744,7 @@ need_resched:
} else
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
- post_schedule(rq);
+ balance_callback(rq);
sched_preempt_enable_no_resched();
if (need_resched())
@@ -6902,7 +6914,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
rq->sd = NULL;
rq->rd = NULL;
rq->cpu_power = SCHED_POWER_SCALE;
- rq->post_schedule = 0;
+ rq->balance_callback = NULL;
rq->active_balance = 0;
rq->next_balance = jiffies;
rq->push_cpu = 0;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 8d3c5dd..aaefe1b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -210,6 +210,18 @@ static inline int has_pushable_dl_tasks(struct rq *rq)
static int push_dl_task(struct rq *rq);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct callback_head, dl_balance_head);
+
+static void push_dl_tasks(struct rq *);
+
+static inline void queue_push_tasks(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ if (!has_pushable_dl_tasks(rq))
+ return;
+
+ queue_balance_callback(rq, &per_cpu(dl_balance_head, rq->cpu), push_dl_tasks);
+}
+
#else
static inline
@@ -232,6 +244,9 @@ void dec_dl_migration(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
{
}
+static inline void queue_push_tasks(struct rq *rq)
+{
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
static void enqueue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
@@ -1005,7 +1020,7 @@ struct task_struct *pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- rq->post_schedule = has_pushable_dl_tasks(rq);
+ queue_push_tasks(rq);
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
return p;
@@ -1422,11 +1437,6 @@ static void pre_schedule_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
pull_dl_task(rq);
}
-static void post_schedule_dl(struct rq *rq)
-{
- push_dl_tasks(rq);
-}
-
/*
* Since the task is not running and a reschedule is not going to happen
* anytime soon on its runqueue, we try pushing it away now.
@@ -1615,7 +1625,6 @@ const struct sched_class dl_sched_class = {
.rq_online = rq_online_dl,
.rq_offline = rq_offline_dl,
.pre_schedule = pre_schedule_dl,
- .post_schedule = post_schedule_dl,
.task_woken = task_woken_dl,
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 27b8e83..2b980d0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -315,6 +315,18 @@ static inline int has_pushable_tasks(struct rq *rq)
return !plist_head_empty(&rq->rt.pushable_tasks);
}
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct callback_head, rt_balance_head);
+
+static void push_rt_tasks(struct rq *);
+
+static inline void queue_push_tasks(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ if (!has_pushable_tasks(rq))
+ return;
+
+ queue_balance_callback(rq, &per_cpu(rt_balance_head, rq->cpu), push_rt_tasks);
+}
+
static void enqueue_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
plist_del(&p->pushable_tasks, &rq->rt.pushable_tasks);
@@ -359,6 +371,9 @@ void dec_rt_migration(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
}
+static inline void queue_push_tasks(struct rq *rq)
+{
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
static inline int on_rt_rq(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
@@ -1349,11 +1364,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- /*
- * We detect this state here so that we can avoid taking the RQ
- * lock again later if there is no need to push
- */
- rq->post_schedule = has_pushable_tasks(rq);
+ queue_push_tasks(rq);
#endif
return p;
@@ -1731,11 +1742,6 @@ static void pre_schedule_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
pull_rt_task(rq);
}
-static void post_schedule_rt(struct rq *rq)
-{
- push_rt_tasks(rq);
-}
-
/*
* If we are not running and we are not going to reschedule soon, we should
* try to push tasks away now
@@ -2008,7 +2014,6 @@ const struct sched_class rt_sched_class = {
.rq_online = rq_online_rt,
.rq_offline = rq_offline_rt,
.pre_schedule = pre_schedule_rt,
- .post_schedule = post_schedule_rt,
.task_woken = task_woken_rt,
.switched_from = switched_from_rt,
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 835b6ef..675e147 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -587,9 +587,10 @@ struct rq {
unsigned long cpu_power;
+ struct callback_head *balance_callback;
+
unsigned char idle_balance;
/* For active balancing */
- int post_schedule;
int active_balance;
int push_cpu;
struct cpu_stop_work active_balance_work;
@@ -690,6 +691,21 @@ extern int migrate_swap(struct task_struct *, struct task_struct *);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static inline void
+queue_balance_callback(struct rq *rq,
+ struct callback_head *head,
+ void (*func)(struct rq *rq))
+{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock);
+
+ if (unlikely(head->next))
+ return;
+
+ head->func = (void (*)(struct callback_head *))func;
+ head->next = rq->balance_callback;
+ rq->balance_callback = head;
+}
+
#define rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(p) \
rcu_dereference_check((p), \
lockdep_is_held(&sched_domains_mutex))
@@ -1131,7 +1147,6 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*migrate_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int next_cpu);
void (*pre_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task);
- void (*post_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq);
void (*task_waking) (struct task_struct *task);
void (*task_woken) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task);
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-05 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-05 8:52 [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-12 8:47 ` Byungchul Park
2016-01-12 10:21 ` Willy Tarreau
2016-01-25 7:25 ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-16 7:08 ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-16 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-16 17:42 ` Greg KH
2016-02-17 0:11 ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-17 0:41 ` Greg KH
2016-02-17 2:00 ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-17 3:01 ` Greg KH
2016-02-17 3:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-23 21:05 ` Ben Hutchings
2016-02-23 21:06 ` Ben Hutchings
2016-01-05 9:16 ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 1/7] sched: Clean up idle task SMP logic Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:16 ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2016-01-05 9:16 ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 3/7] sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:16 ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 4/7] sched,rt: Remove return value from pull_rt_task() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:16 ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 5/7] sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:16 ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 6/7] sched,dl: Remove return value from pull_dl_task() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:16 ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 7/7] sched, dl: Convert switched_{from, to}_dl() / prio_changed_dl() to balance callbacks Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:24 ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 1/6] sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:24 ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 2/6] sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:24 ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 3/6] sched,rt: Remove return value from pull_rt_task() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:24 ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 4/6] sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:24 ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 5/6] sched,dl: Remove return value from pull_dl_task() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:24 ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 6/6] sched, dl: Convert switched_{from, to}_dl() / prio_changed_dl() to balance callbacks Byungchul Park
2016-03-01 8:15 ` [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches Greg KH
2016-07-18 6:31 ` Byungchul Park
2016-07-18 12:09 ` Greg KH
2016-07-18 23:59 ` Byungchul Park
2016-06-13 18:31 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1451985388-19492-2-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com \
--to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pang.xunlei@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®