From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ktkhai@parallels.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, juri.lelli@gmail.com,
pang.xunlei@linaro.org, oleg@redhat.com,
wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH for v3.14.58 5/7] sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:16:26 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1451985388-19492-5-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451985388-19492-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Remove the direct {push,pull} balancing operations from
switched_{from,to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() and use the balance
callback queue.
Again, err on the side of too many reschedules; since too few is a
hard bug while too many is just annoying.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124742.766832367@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Conflicts:
kernel/sched/rt.c
---
kernel/sched/rt.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index d235fd7..0fb72ae 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -315,16 +315,23 @@ static inline int has_pushable_tasks(struct rq *rq)
return !plist_head_empty(&rq->rt.pushable_tasks);
}
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct callback_head, rt_balance_head);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct callback_head, rt_push_head);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct callback_head, rt_pull_head);
static void push_rt_tasks(struct rq *);
+static void pull_rt_task(struct rq *);
static inline void queue_push_tasks(struct rq *rq)
{
if (!has_pushable_tasks(rq))
return;
- queue_balance_callback(rq, &per_cpu(rt_balance_head, rq->cpu), push_rt_tasks);
+ queue_balance_callback(rq, &per_cpu(rt_push_head, rq->cpu), push_rt_tasks);
+}
+
+static inline void queue_pull_task(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ queue_balance_callback(rq, &per_cpu(rt_pull_head, rq->cpu), pull_rt_task);
}
static void enqueue_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
@@ -1837,7 +1844,7 @@ static void switched_from_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
if (!p->on_rq || rq->rt.rt_nr_running)
return;
- pull_rt_task(rq);
+ queue_pull_task(rq);
}
void init_sched_rt_class(void)
@@ -1858,8 +1865,6 @@ void init_sched_rt_class(void)
*/
static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
- int check_resched = 1;
-
/*
* If we are already running, then there's nothing
* that needs to be done. But if we are not running
@@ -1869,13 +1874,12 @@ static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
*/
if (p->on_rq && rq->curr != p) {
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- if (rq->rt.overloaded && push_rt_task(rq) &&
- /* Don't resched if we changed runqueues */
- rq != task_rq(p))
- check_resched = 0;
-#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
- if (check_resched && p->prio < rq->curr->prio)
+ if (rq->rt.overloaded)
+ queue_push_tasks(rq);
+#else
+ if (p->prio < rq->curr->prio)
resched_task(rq->curr);
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
}
}
@@ -1896,14 +1900,13 @@ prio_changed_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio)
* may need to pull tasks to this runqueue.
*/
if (oldprio < p->prio)
- pull_rt_task(rq);
+ queue_pull_task(rq);
+
/*
* If there's a higher priority task waiting to run
- * then reschedule. Note, the above pull_rt_task
- * can release the rq lock and p could migrate.
- * Only reschedule if p is still on the same runqueue.
+ * then reschedule.
*/
- if (p->prio > rq->rt.highest_prio.curr && rq->curr == p)
+ if (p->prio > rq->rt.highest_prio.curr)
resched_task(p);
#else
/* For UP simply resched on drop of prio */
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-05 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-05 8:52 [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-12 8:47 ` Byungchul Park
2016-01-12 10:21 ` Willy Tarreau
2016-01-25 7:25 ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-16 7:08 ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-16 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-16 17:42 ` Greg KH
2016-02-17 0:11 ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-17 0:41 ` Greg KH
2016-02-17 2:00 ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-17 3:01 ` Greg KH
2016-02-17 3:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-23 21:05 ` Ben Hutchings
2016-02-23 21:06 ` Ben Hutchings
2016-01-05 9:16 ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 1/7] sched: Clean up idle task SMP logic Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:16 ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 2/7] sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:16 ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 3/7] sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:16 ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 4/7] sched,rt: Remove return value from pull_rt_task() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:16 ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2016-01-05 9:16 ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 6/7] sched,dl: Remove return value from pull_dl_task() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:16 ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 7/7] sched, dl: Convert switched_{from, to}_dl() / prio_changed_dl() to balance callbacks Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:24 ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 1/6] sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:24 ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 2/6] sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:24 ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 3/6] sched,rt: Remove return value from pull_rt_task() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:24 ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 4/6] sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:24 ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 5/6] sched,dl: Remove return value from pull_dl_task() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05 9:24 ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 6/6] sched, dl: Convert switched_{from, to}_dl() / prio_changed_dl() to balance callbacks Byungchul Park
2016-03-01 8:15 ` [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches Greg KH
2016-07-18 6:31 ` Byungchul Park
2016-07-18 12:09 ` Greg KH
2016-07-18 23:59 ` Byungchul Park
2016-06-13 18:31 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1451985388-19492-5-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com \
--to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pang.xunlei@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®