mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] qxl: apply limit to relocs_num in qxl_process_single_command
@ 2016-02-16 11:49 Gerd Hoffmann
  2016-02-16 12:45 ` Daniel Vetter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gerd Hoffmann @ 2016-02-16 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Airlie
  Cc: Gerd Hoffmann, stable, gnomes, open list:DRM DRIVERS, open list

Limit relocs_num to 65536.  That limit is small enougth to avoid integer
overflow on 32bit machines when calculating reloc_info size (as reported
by Alan Cox), and is big enougth to not block normal usage (kmalloc
would ENOMEM on requests larger than that anyway).

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ioctl.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ioctl.c
index 2ae8577..970cb83 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ioctl.c
@@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ static int qxl_process_single_command(struct qxl_device *qdev,
 		       cmd->command_size))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
+	if (cmd->relocs_num > 65536)
+		return -EINVAL;
 	reloc_info = kmalloc(sizeof(struct qxl_reloc_info) * cmd->relocs_num, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!reloc_info)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-- 
1.8.3.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] qxl: apply limit to relocs_num in qxl_process_single_command
  2016-02-16 11:49 [PATCH] qxl: apply limit to relocs_num in qxl_process_single_command Gerd Hoffmann
@ 2016-02-16 12:45 ` Daniel Vetter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2016-02-16 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gerd Hoffmann
  Cc: David Airlie, One Thousand Gnomes, open list:DRM DRIVERS, stable,
	open list

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> wrote:
> +       if (cmd->relocs_num > 65536)
> +               return -EINVAL;
>         reloc_info = kmalloc(sizeof(struct qxl_reloc_info) * cmd->relocs_num, GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!reloc_info)
>                 return -ENOMEM;

Why not just use one of the array alloc functions like kcalloc?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-16 12:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-16 11:49 [PATCH] qxl: apply limit to relocs_num in qxl_process_single_command Gerd Hoffmann
2016-02-16 12:45 ` Daniel Vetter

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®