mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC] Add missing #include <linux/bug.h>
@ 2016-04-25 18:10 Eric Engestrom
  2016-04-25 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Engestrom @ 2016-04-25 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Eric Engestrom, Andrew Morton, Joe Perches, Hannes Frederic Sowa,
	Rasmus Villemoes, David S. Miller, Daniel Borkmann,
	Andrey Ryabinin

ARRAY_SIZE uses BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO, which is undefined is you don't
include linux/bug.h first, which just happened to me.

Is there any reason this include isn't here? A quick grep found 595
other files using a define from bug.h without ever including it.

If this is a simple mistake and was forgotten, I can send an actual
patchset to fix this, but it feels like it was left out on purpose.

Cheers,
  Eric Engestrom

PS: If this is a cleanup that needs to be done, I might to it for other
headers as well.

---
 include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
index eeae401..01e6869 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
 #error "Please don't include <linux/compiler-gcc.h> directly, include <linux/compiler.h> instead."
 #endif
 
+#include <linux/bug.h>
+
 /*
  * Common definitions for all gcc versions go here.
  */
-- 
2.8.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] Add missing #include <linux/bug.h>
  2016-04-25 18:10 [RFC] Add missing #include <linux/bug.h> Eric Engestrom
@ 2016-04-25 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2016-04-25 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Engestrom
  Cc: linux-kernel, Joe Perches, Hannes Frederic Sowa,
	Rasmus Villemoes, David S. Miller, Daniel Borkmann,
	Andrey Ryabinin

On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:10:55 +0100 Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com> wrote:

> ARRAY_SIZE uses BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO, which is undefined is you don't
> include linux/bug.h first, which just happened to me.
> 
> Is there any reason this include isn't here? A quick grep found 595
> other files using a define from bug.h without ever including it.

yeah.  A lot of the kernel compiles by accident ;) We just fix stuff
when it blows up - it ain't pretty but this process works acceptably
well.

> --- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
>  #error "Please don't include <linux/compiler-gcc.h> directly, include <linux/compiler.h> instead."
>  #endif
>  
> +#include <linux/bug.h>
> +
>  /*
>   * Common definitions for all gcc versions go here.
>   */

hm, it Seems Wrong to include bug.h into compiler.h - the latter is
such a low-level infrastructury thing.  As evidenced by the fact that
bug.h explicitly includes compiler.h!

The bottom line is that our headers are just too large and complex and
try to do too much stuff.  Going finer-grained is always a good fix,
but I don't think you want to be adding a new array_size.h!

I guess we could move __must_be_array() into kernel.h and use #ifdef
__GNUC__ (or whatever).  But that adds to kernel.h (another) dependency
on bug.h, which kernel.h doesn't (and probably shouldn't and possibly
can't) include.  Sucks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-25 18:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-04-25 18:10 [RFC] Add missing #include <linux/bug.h> Eric Engestrom
2016-04-25 18:36 ` Andrew Morton

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®